debate - chunhualiao/public-docs GitHub Wiki

http://20.3.246.40:3000/

Should the US ban Chinese citizens from buying US lands due to national security concerns?

To quickly get up to speed on debate, here’s a structured plan:

debate:universal basic income

debate:mistakes

debate:judge

greatest debates

Definitions

Here are some mainstream definitions of "debate":

Oxford English Dictionary:
- Debate: A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward and which usually ends with a vote.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
- Debate: A contention by words or arguments; a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides.
Cambridge Dictionary:
- Debate: (a) Serious discussion of a subject in which many people take part. (b) A formal discussion, especially in a parliament, in which people express different opinions about a subject.
National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA):
- Debate: A competitive event where participants argue for or against a specific resolution or topic, judged based on argumentation, evidence, and presentation skills.
UNESCO (Educational Definition):
- Debate: An educational activity that promotes critical thinking, public speaking, and reasoned argumentation, allowing participants to articulate and defend a position while engaging with opposing viewpoints.

1. Understand Debate Basics

Formats of Debate: Learn common formats like Lincoln-Douglas, Policy Debate, and Public Forum. These formats often define time limits, roles, and structures.
Roles in Debate:
- Proposition (affirmative) presents arguments supporting the resolution.
- Opposition (negative) refutes those arguments and presents counter-arguments.
- Judges evaluate based on criteria like logic, evidence, and delivery.

2. Learn Debate Skills

Argumentation: Understand how to structure arguments using:
- Claim: Your assertion.
- Evidence: Supporting facts/data.
- Warrant: Explanation linking evidence to the claim.
Rebuttals: Practice countering opposing arguments logically and concisely.
Judging Criteria: Learn common judging metrics like impact, logic, and presentation.

3. Study Debate Resources

Books:
- The Debater’s Guide by Jon M. Ericson.
- They Say / I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein.
Videos: Watch debate examples on platforms like YouTube. Look for debates from organizations like the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA).
Online Courses: Explore platforms like Coursera or Udemy for debate courses.

4. Apply Concepts to AI Debating

Understand Debate in AI Terms:
- How AI models formulate arguments and structure debates.
- The role of logic and consistency in model-generated arguments.
Study Debate Simulations:
- Review existing AI debate simulations like IBM’s Project Debater for insights.

debate judge

Formats

Here's a table comparing the most common debate formats:

Aspect	Lincoln-Douglas (LD)	Policy Debate	Public Forum (PF)
Focus	Values and philosophy.	Policy-making and implementation feasibility.	Current events and public issues.
Team Structure	1 vs. 1 (one debater per side).	2 vs. 2 (teams of two).	2 vs. 2 (teams of two).
Resolution	Value-based, focused on morality or ethical questions.	Policy-based, calling for a specific action or plan.	Fact or policy-based, tied to current, real-world topics.
Round Length	40–45 minutes.	1.5–2 hours.	35–50 minutes.
Speaking Time	Longer speeches, less emphasis on cross-examination.	Long speeches with detailed cross-examinations.	Shorter speeches and more rapid exchanges.
Cross-Examination	Limited, typically done by one debater.	In-depth, often includes technical questioning.	Often more conversational and accessible.
Judging Criteria	Philosophical consistency, value justification, and logic.	Policy impacts, feasibility, and evidence-based argumentation.	Persuasion, clarity, and audience understanding.
Preparation Required	High, often requiring familiarity with philosophical concepts.	Very high, includes technical evidence and detailed plans.	Moderate, with focus on timely and relevant research.
Audience	Judges with a background in values/philosophy.	Experienced judges familiar with policy and technical debates.	General audiences or lay judges.
Style	Formal and intellectual.	Technical and analytical.	Conversational and persuasive.

Let me know if you'd like to refine this table for a specific purpose or audience!

Types (by focus)

Comparison of Approaches to Debates Focusing on Facts, Values, or Policies

Aspect	Fact Debate	Value Debate	Policy Debate
Objective	Determine the truth or accuracy of a statement.	Evaluate the worth or morality of an idea.	Advocate for or against a specific course of action.
Focus	Verifiable evidence and factual data.	Ethical principles, societal norms, or priorities.	Practical solutions to address a specific problem.
Key Questions	Is it true or false? What do the facts show?	Is it right or wrong? Which value is superior?	Is the plan necessary, feasible, and beneficial?
Evidence	Empirical data, statistics, expert testimony.	Philosophical arguments, cultural examples, precedents.	Policy studies, cost-benefit analysis, real-world examples.
Structure	- Define key terms. - Present evidence. - Disprove counter-evidence.	- Define key values. - Rank competing values. - Illustrate value alignment.	- Highlight the problem. - Propose a plan. - Prove feasibility and benefits.
Argument Types	Logical and evidence-based reasoning.	Moral, ethical, or value-based reasoning.	Practical and solution-oriented reasoning.
Approach to Refutation	Dispute accuracy or reliability of evidence.	Challenge value assumptions or priorities.	Question the practicality, cost, or risks of the plan.
Appeals to Audience	Appeals to logic and objectivity (logos).	Appeals to values and ethics (ethos, pathos).	Appeals to practicality and benefits (logos, ethos).
Examples	- “Global temperatures are rising due to human activity.” - “Crime rates are declining in urban areas.”	- “Democracy is the most just form of government.” - “Privacy is more important than security.”	- “The government should adopt universal healthcare.” - “We should implement renewable energy subsidies.”
Evaluation Criteria	Reliability and relevance of evidence.	Consistency and persuasiveness of value hierarchy.	Effectiveness, feasibility, and cost-benefit ratio of the proposed policy.

This table highlights the distinctions between the three types of debates and provides a clear guide on how to approach each one effectively.

AI-based debate simulation

Several state-of-the-art AI-based debate simulation systems have emerged recently, leveraging advanced language models to create engaging and educational debate experiences:

Debate Club: This platform uses ChatGPT-4 to simulate one-on-one debates, presenting standalone arguments for each point. It randomly assigns users to argue for or against a given topic, promoting clear and direct exchanges of ideas[1].
!! A.I. Debate !!: This specialized GPT variant simulates balanced debates between two characters, Artifice and Human, on various AI-related topics. It offers contrasting perspectives in a structured format, alternating viewpoints to provide comprehensive understanding of AI issues[3].
AI Debate Synthesizer OPED: This system features five AI entities dynamically debating a given theme, leading to a proposal-based conclusion. It offers a game-like experience for exploring multiple perspectives on complex topics[3].
House: This software program allows users to define different personas and assign AI models to them, enabling customized debate simulations with multiple perspectives on topics of interest[5].
GPTs: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-5DuYEGd7Y-debate-master

Citations: