debate:mistakes - chunhualiao/public-docs GitHub Wiki
Here's a table listing the top 10 mistakes in debates and tips on how to avoid them:
| Mistake | Description | How to Avoid It |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of Preparation | Insufficient research and weak evidence lead to unconvincing arguments. | Research extensively, anticipate counterarguments, and prepare robust evidence. |
| Ignoring the Resolution | Straying off-topic or failing to address the resolution directly. | Stay focused on the resolution and ensure all arguments relate to it explicitly. |
| Overloading Arguments | Presenting too many points without depth, leading to surface-level arguments. | Prioritize 2–3 strong points and develop them thoroughly with evidence and reasoning. |
| Weak Rebuttals | Failing to address or effectively counter opposing arguments. | Listen carefully, take notes, and directly refute key points with logic and evidence. |
| Relying on Fallacies | Using logical fallacies (e.g., strawman, ad hominem) undermines credibility. | Study common logical fallacies and double-check arguments for sound reasoning. |
| Monotone Delivery | Poor vocal variety and lack of passion make speeches less engaging. | Practice speaking with energy, varying tone, and emphasizing key points. |
| Time Mismanagement | Running out of time before delivering key points or failing to use all time. | Practice timed speeches and allocate time wisely for introduction, body, and conclusion. |
| Overloading Jargon | Using complex terminology can confuse judges and audience members. | Use clear, concise language and explain technical terms when necessary. |
| Ignoring Judge Feedback | Failing to adapt to judge preferences or past feedback. | Understand judging criteria and adapt delivery based on prior feedback. |
| Emotional Arguments | Over-relying on emotion instead of evidence weakens logical appeal. | Balance emotional appeals with strong factual and logical support to build credibility. |
Would you like further examples or elaboration on any specific mistake?