Focus FeatureSource around FeatureReader and FeatureWriter - STEMLab/geotools GitHub Wiki
-
Motivation: The current api is a mess
-
Contact: Justin Deoliveira
-
Tracker: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-1922 for GeoTools 2.5.x tasks
-
Tagline: Cleaning up data store / feature access api
Currently our data access api presents two ways to access data:
- query-based reader/writer access
- operation-based collection access
While providing two modes of data access does have some advantages in terms of flexibility it has some major problems:
Having two apis for accessing data makes it harder to approach for users. Either method does not present any decisive advantage over the other. Its just "more than one way to do it" (to coin a phrase from perl), which has led to more headache than benefit.
FeatureCollection
duplicates much of what was originally created in
FeatureReader
/FeatureWriter
. The biggest violation being iterators. Not only does
FeatureCollection
provide a duplication of FeatureReader
in the form of Iterator
from java
collections, it goes beyond and defines the features()
method which returns a FeatureIterator
,
which is literally a one-to-one duplication of FeatureReader
.
One of the biggest problems of this duplication has been with resect to decorators. Each time a decorator is implemented, it is implemented up to 3 times. To add to the mess a set of adapters have been created to go back and forth between the 3 types of iterator. The following diagram illustrates:
Having two data access apis to implement makes it very hard to create a clean datastore, which ultimately leads to a high cost of maintainence. This had led to a mass of unsupported format drivers in Geotools. With a better organization and internal api for implementing datastores, many of these drivers could be saved.
Data store implementors having to implement FeatureCollection
is something that has been a
disaster. The following diagram illustrates:
The approach presented in this proposal is two fold:
- focus the
DataStore
/FeatureSource
api aroundFeatureReader
andFeatureWriter
- make
FeatureCollection
a convenience wrapper aroundDataStore
/FeatureSource
The benefits of this are:
- 100% backwards compatable
- Implementors can ignore
FeatureCollection
and implement the simplerFeatureReader
/FeatureWriter
api -
FeatureCollection
gets implemented once and all duplication is removed
The modifications to the current datastore api are strictly additions. Consider the following:
interface DataStore2 extends DataStore {
FeatureSource getFeatureSource( String typeName, Transaction tx );
FeatureSource getFeatureSource( Name typeName, Transaction tx );
}
interface FeatureSource2 extends FeatureSource {
/** get a reader over the entire set of features */
FeatureReader getReader();
/** get a reader over a subset of features */
FeatureReader getReader( Filter filter );
FeatureReader getReader( Query query );
}
interface FeatureStore2 extends FeatureStore {
/** get an inserting + updating writer over the entire set of features */
FeatureWriter getWriter();
/** get an inserting + updating writer over a subset set of features */
FeatureWriter getWriter( Filter filter );
FeatureWriter getWriter( Query query );
/** get an updating writer */
FeatureWriter getWriterUpdate();
FeatureWriter getWriterUpdate( Filter filter );
FeatureWriter getWriterUpdate( Query query );
/** get an inserting writer */
FeatureWriter getWriterInsert();
}
As for FeatureCollection
, with this additional api it is possible to create a single
implementation which delegates to the DataStore
and FeatureSource
api. Such an implementation
can be found
here.
The ContentDataStore
class is an experimental abstract datastore implementation which is based on
the api changes presented in this proposal. It is the base of the new jdbc datastore which has been
used in GeoServer and is fully cite compliant (so we know it works).
This proposal is under construction.
Voting has not started yet:
-
| :white_check_mark: | :no_entry: | :warning: | :negative_squared_cross_mark: |
------------|--------------------|------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------| no progress | done | impeded | lack mandate/funds/time | volunteer needed |
GeoTools 2.5
- ✅ feature collection is no longer a Java Collection
- ✅ https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-1922
GeoTools 2.7.x
- Review the FeatureCollection implementation in H2 datastore that completly delegates to FeatureSource
- Copy the FeatureSource implementation from H2 into data store modules one at a time