Page Index - PrototypeJam/lake_merritt GitHub Wiki

111 page(s) in this GitHub Wiki:

• Home
• PROMPT:
• YOUR TASK:
• Output (Gemini)
• 1. Summary of prototypejam-agento_app.txt
• 2. Detailed Plan for "Modular Python Streamlit App for Evals Initial Prototype"
• 3. Somewhat Detailed Plan for SHORT TERM ToDo Features (Page 2 Enhancements)
• 4. Somewhat Detailed Plan for ROADMAP of LONGER TERM ASPIRATIONS
• PROMPT
• OUTPUT (Gemini)
• Project Overview: A General-Purpose, Modular, and Extensible AI Evaluation Platform
• User Flow and UI/UX Perspective (Initial Prototype)
• Roadmap (What & Why - Not How)
• APPROACHES TO IMPLEMENT THESE HIGHER LEVEL PROJECT REQUIREMENTS FOLLOW:
• ChatGPT-o3
• 1 Directory / File Layout
• 2 Module Responsibilities
• 3 Extensibility & Future Features Hooks
• 4 Immediate Next Steps
• Gemini 2.5 Pro 06-05 (newest model)
• Architectural Approach
• Directory Structure
• High-Level Content of Each File/Module
• app.py
• pages/1_System_Configuration.py
• pages/2_Evaluation_Setup.py
• pages/3_View_Results.py
• pages/4_Download_Center.py
• Core Logic (src/) Files
• src/data_models.py
• src/llm_clients/
• src/scoring/
• src/generation.py
• src/evaluation.py
• src/data_io.py
• src/utils.py
• Claude Opus 4 (newest Model)
• Directory Structure
• File Contents Overview
• app.py
• config/settings.py
• config/schemas.py
• core/models/base.py
• core/scoring/base.py
• core/evaluation/runner.py
• ui/pages/1_system_config.py
• Key Design Decisions and Future-Proofing
• 1. Modular Architecture with Clear Interfaces
• 2. Abstract Base Classes for Providers and Scorers
• 3. Pydantic Models for Data Exchange
• 4. Centralized Retry Logic
• 5. Session State Abstraction
• 6. Component-Based UI
• 7. Prepared for Async Operations
• 8. Logging and Observability Ready
• 9. Feature Flags via Settings
• 10. Test Structure Mirrors Code Structure
• ASSESSMENT/CRITIQUE OF POTENTIAL APPROACHES, and PROPOSED WAY FORWARD FOLLOWS
• PROMPT
• OUTPUT: Gemini 2.5 Pro 06-05
• 1. Assessment and Critique of Each Approach
• Approach 1: ChatGPT-o3
• Approach 2: Gemini
• Approach 3: Claude Opus
• 2. The Ideal Approach: A Hybrid, with Gemini as the Foundation
• WHY This Hybrid Approach is Best
• OUTPUT - Claude Opus 4
• 1. Individual Approach Assessment
• ChatGPT-o3 Approach
• Gemini 2.5 Pro Approach
• Claude Opus 4 Approach
• 2. Recommended Approach: Best Combined Approach
• Ideal Combined Structure:
• Key Decisions from Each Approach:
• Why This Combination Works Best:
• Implementation Priority:
• OUTPUT - OpenAI o3
• 1. Suitability analysis against each time-horizon
• a) Initial prototype (evaluate existing outputs – “Mode A”)
• b) Near-term additions (generate outputs, multiple scorers – “Mode B”)
• c) 12--18 month roadmap (cross-run analytics, live telemetry, prompt versioning, OTLP)
• 2. Recommend-or-blend decision
• Is there one clear winner?
• Why not the others?
• How to future-proof the chosen base without “re-build” risk
• Action plan
• KEY DECISIONS/PREFERENCES and ASSESSMENT OF CRITIQUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOW
• PROMPT
• Gemini 2.5 Pro 05-06
• 1. Key Decisions & Preferences You Need to Make/Articulate
• 2. My Analysis and Recommended Implementation Path
• Claude Opus 4
• 1. Key Decisions You Need to Make
• Technical Preferences
• Development Philosophy
• Team and Timeline
• 2. My Analysis and Recommendation
• The Winner: Modified ChatGPT-o3 Approach
• Core Strengths of ChatGPT-o3:
• Why Not the Others:
• My Recommended Hybrid Approach:
• Implementation Sequence:
• Key Principles:
• Why This Approach Wins:
• OpenAI o3
• 1 Key decisions & preferences you should lock in now
• 2 My synthesis & recommendation
• Claude, Gemini, GPT API refinement info
• Please reload this page
• Complete OpenAI Codex Setup Guide for Python Projects with Tests
• Please reload this page