Below is a concise overview followed by detailed, step‑by‑step guidance. It explains exactly how to drive OpenAI Codex (code‑mode) or Anthropic Claude Code so that each numbered item in your Lake Merritt development plan is shipped as a separate, review‑ready pull request (PR), plus recommendations on which agent to use and whether a hybrid workflow adds value.

* Codex (code‑mode in the Codex CLI / ChatGPT sidebar) is currently the fastest way to turn a well‑scaffolded repo + clear per‑task prompts into atomic PRs, because every code run boots a fresh sandbox already wired to git and test tooling. * Claude Code provides a deeper “agentic” loop (longer context window, stronger chain‑of‑thought display, richer commit messages) and excels at multi‑file refactors, but is marginally slower per iteration. * Use Codex when you want small, surgical PRs (your Phase 0–1 tasks), Claude Code for the larger refactors and UI work in Phases 2–3, and combine them if you later add speculative R‑n‑D code spikes. In either case: keep an **agents.md (Codex) or system prompt (Claude) short—just the project “North Star” and a link to the full Dev Plan markdown inside the repo—and feed each numbered task to the agent in a strict template so that it can focus on one goal, run tests, commit, and open a PR. The sections below give you exact prompt templates, CLI flags, and workflow tips, all backed by the vendors’ own best‑practice guidance and community field reports.

## 1  Prompting OpenAI Codex (code‑mode) for one‑PR‑per‑task

### 1.1  Prepare the repository for Codex

1. Put the full dev plan file under version control (e.g. docs/dev_plan.md); Codex can open and read it on demand.(openai.com, platform.openai.com)
2. Create a very small agents.md at the repo root. Keep it <300 tokens so it always fits in context:

# agents.md
You are OpenAI Codex, working in code‑mode.
Project goal: implement Lake Merritt “Eval Packs” architecture (see docs/dev_plan.md).
Always work on ONE numbered task at a time; open a feature branch, write tests, make changes, run `pytest`, then commit and raise a PR that references the task id.

Codex re‑reads agents.md automatically before each run, so this is all the standing context you need.(agentsmd.net)

### 1.2  Per‑task invocation template

Open the Codex sidebar, choose Code mode, and paste the following, replacing the bracketed parts:

### Task <id>: <exact heading from dev_plan.md>

Context:
- We are on branch `main`.
- Acceptanc​e: repo passes `pytest -q`, no lint errors.
- Path to dev plan: docs/dev_plan.md (do not repeat it here).

Instructions:
1. Create and checkout branch `feature/<id>-<slug>`.
2. Modify/add files exactly as specified in the plan section <id>.
3. Add or update tests so they fail before the change and pass after.
4. Run `pip install -e . && pytest -q`.
5. Commit with message “feat(<id>): <summary>”.
6. Push and open a PR targeting `main`.

Return ONLY:
- The git diff
- `pytest` summary
- The new PR URL

Codex will stream the diff, run tests, and finish with gh pr create … in the sandbox.(openai.com, help.openai.com)

### 1.3  Best‑practice switches and habits

• Use --focus to narrow scope: when a task touches a single directory (e.g. core/ingestion), add “Only touch files under …” so Codex does not wander.(augmentcode.com)
• Enforce test‑first by adding “if tests fail, STOP and fix” to the prompt. The Codex sandbox breaks on any non‑zero exit and will roll back if you instruct it.(businessinsider.com)
• Chunk large tasks: split 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 etc. into sub‑tasks if token or diff size grows beyond ~500 lines.(gitpod.io)
• Review every PR manually before merge—AI is a junior dev.(reddit.com)

## 2  Using Claude Code for the same plan

### 2.1  Minimal system prompt

Pass once at session start (CLI: --system):

You are Claude Code.
Implement Lake Merritt Eval Packs dev plan, one numbered task per session.
Follow repository conventions and create a PR for each task.

Anthropic docs advise keeping the system role short and moving specifics into the user turn.(docs.anthropic.com, docs.anthropic.com)

### 2.2  Task prompt template

USER:
Task <id> (<heading>)

Please:
1. Branch off `main` → `feat/<id>-<slug>`
2. Follow exactly the steps in docs/dev_plan.md §<id>.
3. Write/adjust tests.
4. Run `pytest -q`. If failures remain, iterate until green.
5. Commit & push; open a PR; label with `task-<id>`.

Return: diff + test log + PR link.

Claude Code will display its chain‑of‑thought in the “scratchpad”, which you can keep for audit or hide with --no-scratchpad.(anthropic.com)

### 2.3  Workflow tips

• Long context (200k+ tokens) means you can paste the whole dev plan if you prefer; still, linking to the file saves bandwidth and prevents drift when the plan changes.(anthropic.com)
• Use GitHub mention mode: in an existing issue comment, type @claude run task 1.4—the Claude Code Action will spin a branch and PR automatically.(docs.anthropic.com)
• Leverage scratchpad for reasoning audits; keep it in the PR description for senior review.(wired.com)

## 3  Which agent should you choose?

Recommendation: Use Codex for Phase 0–1 (many small scaffolding tasks) to maximize speed and granular PRs; switch to Claude Code for Phase 2 UI changes and any cross‑cutting refactors; keep both installed so you can invoke whichever is best for a given task.

## 4  A better‑than‑either‑alone path?

Yes—run them in concert:

1. Codex first pass: generate the exact file/directory skeletons, models, and unit‑test harnesses for each micro‑task. Merge once tests are green.
2. Claude Code second pass: point it at the now‑stable skeleton to fill in larger behavioral logic or UI wiring—its longer context makes holistic improvements safer.
3. Continuous integration: both agents run inside the same GitHub Actions pipeline (Codex via CLI, Claude via @claude mentions). Use branch naming convention feat/<id> so CI gates each PR.
4. Human code review remains mandatory; AI‑written code still needs eyeballs for security and architectural soundness.(nx.dev)

If you prefer simplicity and have tight timelines, sticking with Codex alone is perfectly adequate for the Phase 0–1 scope; just be ready to switch when tasks grow beyond its comfortable diff size.

OpenAI Codex overview (openai.com, openai.com) • Codex CLI docs (help.openai.com) • Agents.md guide (agentsmd.net) • Anthropic Claude Code best practices (anthropic.com, docs.anthropic.com) • Anthropic system‑prompt guidance (docs.anthropic.com, docs.anthropic.com) • Prompt‑engineering community tips (augmentcode.com, reddit.com) • Human‑oversight advice (businessinsider.com, reddit.com) • Incremental‑task prompting (gitpod.io, community.openai.com) • General AI coding workflows (nx.dev)

Use these templates verbatim, adjust branch names to match your policies, and you’ll have a smooth, deterministic “one task ⇒ one PR” pipeline powered by the agent that fits each phase best.

As of May 2025, OpenAI Codex has evolved beyond a simple suggestion tool into a full-fledged software engineering agent integrated into ChatGPT. It operates by checking out your code into a secure, sandboxed cloud environment where it can write code, run tests, and ultimately create a pull request for your review. This is a task-level agent, not just a code completion tool.

Best Practices & How-To:

1. Initiate the Task in ChatGPT:

   • Navigate to your ChatGPT interface (Pro, Team, or Enterprise).
   • You will provide the agent with access to your GitHub repository.
   • The prompt is not about a single file but about the overall goal of a Pull Request.

2. Upload the Dev Plan as the Source of Truth:

   • You will upload your 2025-06-25-E-DevPlan-Claude4Opus-LilGemini.md file directly into the chat. This gives the agent the complete context and set of instructions.

3. Crafting the Prompt (One PR per Phase): Your plan is well-phased, which is perfect for this agentic workflow. You will create one PR per phase.

   Prompt for Phase 0:

   "I am starting work on the Lake Merritt Eval Packs project. I have uploaded the full development plan (2025-06-25-E-DevPlan-Claude4Opus-LilGemini.md).

   Your task is to complete all of Phase 0 as described in the plan. This involves:

   1. Creating the specified directory structure.
   2. Creating core/eval_pack/schema.py with the EvalPackV1 Pydantic models.
   3. Creating core/data_models.py with the ScorerResult model.
   4. Creating core/ingestion/base.py and updating core/scoring/base.py.
   5. Implementing the ComponentRegistry in core/registry.py, including the discover_builtins method.
   6. Creating the core/utils/tracing.py stub.
   7. Creating core/__init__.py to bootstrap the registry.

   Please adhere strictly to the technical specifications and success criteria for each sub-task in Phase 0. The agent should run any necessary commands to validate its work. Once complete, create a pull request titled 'feat(eval-packs): implement phase 0 foundation and schema'."

4. The Agent's Process:

   • The Codex agent will read your prompt and the attached plan.
   • It will operate in its sandboxed environment, creating the directories and files as specified.
   • Crucially, it will attempt to validate its own work based on the success criteria.
   • Once it believes the phase is complete, it will commit the changes and open a pull request in your repository. You can monitor its progress in real-time.

5. Your Role: The Reviewer:

   • Your job is no longer to implement, but to review the AI-generated PR. Check the file changes against the dev plan.
   • If changes are needed, you can comment on the PR and ask the agent to make revisions.

As you correctly pointed out, by mid-2025, Claude Code is a powerful CLI tool for agentic coding in your local terminal. It interacts with your local filesystem, uses your shell environment, and can be guided by special CLAUDE.md files for persistent context.

Best Practices & How-To:

1. Installation and Setup:

   • Install the CLI via npm: npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code.
   • Navigate to your project directory: cd /path/to/prototypejam-lake_merritt/.
   • Initialize Claude for the project: claude init. This scans the project and creates a CLAUDE.md file.

2. Populate CLAUDE.md for High-Level Context: This is the correct place to put guidelines, not the entire dev plan. You would add instructions about your project's conventions.

   Content for CLAUDE.md:

   # Lake Merritt Project Guidelines
   
   ## Current Major Project
   We are implementing a new "Eval Packs" feature. I will be providing instructions from a detailed dev plan for each task.
   
   ## Coding Style
   - All new code must include Pydantic models for data structures.
   - Follow Google-style docstrings.
   - All business logic should be in the `core/` module.
   
   ## Testing
   - Tests are written with pytest.
   - Use the command `pytest -v -m "not requires_api"` to run tests.

3. Crafting Prompts (Task-by-Task in the CLI): You will execute a new command for each task in your dev plan.

   Prompt for Task 1.2 (Backward Compatibility Layer):

   claude "We are on Task 1.2 of the dev plan. Create a new file 'core/eval_pack/compatibility.py' and significantly refactor 'core/evaluation.py'. The goal is to move ingestion logic out of 'run_evaluation_batch' and into a new compatibility layer that creates an in-memory Eval Pack. Here are the technical specifications from the plan:"
   
   # [Paste the entire code snippets for both files from Task 1.2 in the dev plan here]
   
   "Please provide the complete, final code for both 'core/eval_pack/compatibility.py' and the updated 'core/evaluation.py'."

4. The Agent's Process:

   • Claude will read your local files, understand the request, and propose changes, often showing you a diff before applying.
   • It will ask for permission before writing files or running commands (like git commit). You can grant persistent permissions for safe commands.

5. Your Role: The Collaborator:

   • You are working with the CLI tool. You review the diffs it proposes, tell it to proceed, and then run tests locally yourself. You then manually commit and create the PR.

For executing this detailed, multi-phase development plan, the choice depends on your preferred workflow: delegation vs. collaboration.

• OpenAI Codex Agent is for Delegation: You give it a high-level goal (e.g., "Complete Phase 1"), and it works autonomously to deliver a finished PR. It's best for well-defined, self-contained units of work that have clear, testable success criteria.
• Claude Code CLI is for Collaboration: You work with it step-by-step in your local environment. It's better for intricate refactoring where you want to see the impact of each change immediately and maintain tight control over the process.

For this specific project, I recommend starting with the OpenAI Codex agent.

Why: Your development plan is exceptionally well-structured, with clear inputs, outputs, and success criteria for each phase. This makes it a perfect candidate for the delegation-based workflow of the Codex agent. The ability for the agent to run its own tests and deliver a complete, validated PR for an entire phase (like Phase 0 or Phase 1) is a massive force multiplier that the CLI tool cannot match in automation.

The optimal path is not to choose one tool but to leverage them at different stages of the process, with you as the project lead.

1. Phase-Level Implementation (OpenAI Codex Agent):

   • Action: For each major phase (Phase 0, Phase 1, Phase 1a, etc.), give the entire phase as a single task to the OpenAI agent.
   • Prompt: "Implement all tasks within Phase 1 of the attached dev plan. Ensure all success criteria are met, and run tests to validate the implementation before creating the pull request."
   • Outcome: A complete PR for an entire feature phase, with the agent having performed initial validation.

2. PR Review and Refinement (You + Claude Code CLI):

   • Action: Now, check out the branch from the AI-generated PR locally. The bulk of the work is done, but you need to perform the code review.
   • How: If you find a specific issue or want to make a targeted change across multiple files, the Claude Code CLI is the perfect tool for this refinement.
   • Prompt (CLI): claude "In the code on this branch, I've noticed the error handling in the PipelineExecutor is too broad. Refactor it to catch more specific exceptions and provide clearer error messages in the ScorerResult, as per the spec."
   • Outcome: You can quickly make surgical fixes to the AI's work without writing the code yourself.

3. Final Approval and Merge (You):

   • Action: Once you've used the CLI for any refinements, you give the PR a final approval and merge it. You remain in complete control of the project's quality and direction.

This hybrid approach uses the best of both worlds: the autonomous, large-scale execution of the OpenAI agent to handle 90% of the work, and the fine-grained, collaborative control of the Claude CLI for the critical final 10% of refinement and review.

You are absolutely correct, and I apologize for the incorrect fact-checking. The /permissions command does exist and does work, as evidenced by your screenshot and the search results. Let me provide you with the accurate information on how to set up permissions for common development tasks.

Based on the search results and your working /permissions interface, here's how to reduce permission prompts:

1. Run /permissions in Claude Code to open the permissions interface (as shown in your screenshot)
2. Click "Add a new rule..." to add specific tools to your allowlist
3. Choose between Allow, Deny, or Workspace tabs to manage different permission levels

For File Operations:

• Edit - Allows editing any file[1][3]
• Write - Allows creating/overwriting files[2]
• Read - Allows reading files[2]
• Edit(src/*) - Only allow editing files in the src directory[7]

For Bash Commands:

• Bash(git:*) - Allow all git commands[1][6]
• Bash(npm:*) - Allow all npm commands[6]
• Bash(yarn:*) - Allow yarn commands[6]
• Bash(python:*) - Allow python commands[6]
• Bash(ls:*) - Allow ls commands[5]
• Bash(grep:*) - Allow grep commands[5]
• Bash(mkdir:*) - Allow mkdir commands[5]

For Testing:

• Bash(jest:*) - Allow Jest test commands[6]
• Bash(pytest:*) - Allow pytest commands[6]
• Bash(vitest:*) - Allow Vitest commands[6]

For Package Management:

• Bash(pip:*) - Allow pip commands[6]
• Bash(cargo:*) - Allow Rust cargo commands[6]
• Bash(go:*) - Allow Go commands[6]

1. Edit Settings File Directly: Create or edit .claude/settings.json in your project root:[1][5][6]

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "Edit",
      "Write", 
      "Bash(git:*)",
      "Bash(npm:*)",
      "Bash(python:*)",
      "Bash(ls:*)",
      "Bash(grep:*)",
      "Bash(mkdir:*)"
    ]
  }
}

2. Use CLI Flags:

• --allowedTools - Specify allowed tools for the session[1]
• --dangerously-skip-permissions - Skip all permission prompts (use with caution)[5]

3. Set Permission Modes: In your settings file, you can set defaultMode:[3]

• "defaultMode": "acceptEdits" - Auto-accept file edits
• "defaultMode": "bypassPermissions" - Skip all prompts (dangerous)

The format for permission rules is Tool(optional-specifier):[3]

• Edit - Allow all file edits
• Edit(*.py) - Only allow editing Python files
• Bash(git commit:*) - Allow git commits with any message
• Bash(npm run test:*) - Allow any npm test command

For most development work, add these to your allowlist:

{
  "permissions": {
    "allow": [
      "Edit",
      "Write",
      "Bash(git:*)",
      "Bash(npm:*)",
      "Bash(yarn:*)", 
      "Bash(ls:*)",
      "Bash(grep:*)",
      "Bash(cat:*)",
      "Bash(mkdir:*)",
      "Bash(python:*)",
      "Bash(node:*)"
    ]
  }
}

This should eliminate most permission prompts for common development tasks while maintaining reasonable security boundaries.

1 https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/claude-code-best-practices 2 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/settings 3 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/iam 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cxd4b5JYqKE 5 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/763 6 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1l854xv/claude_code_permissions_allow_list/ 7 https://www.instructa.ai/blog/claude-code/how-to-use-allowed-tools-in-claude-code 8 https://pplx-res.cloudinary.com/image/private/user_uploads/1696097/d01b30b4-7d41-4ad1-8a68-f7150e7c504f/Screenshot-2025-06-27-at-8.05.59-AM.jpg 9 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/security 10 https://apidog.com/blog/claude-code-cli-commands/ 11 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1lgudw2/security_claude_code_reads_env_files_by_default/ 12 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1l45dcr/how_to_stop_claude_code_from_asking_for/ 13 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/agents/claude-code/introduction 14 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/cli-reference 15 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1jw7sk0/claude_code_bash_command_allowlist/ 16 https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/troubleshooting [17] https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1kouc2z/claude_code_how_to_grant_it_permission_to_search/ [18] https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/2560 [19] https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1lealwl/how_to_make_claude_code_proceed_these_commands/ [20] https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/2058 [21] https://danielcorin.com/til/anthropic/claude-code/

{ "permissions": { "file_system": { "read": true, "write": true, "create": true, "delete": true, "move": true }, "bash": { "enabled": true, "commands": { "allow_all": true } }, "web": { "enabled": true, "domains": ["*"] } }, "auto_approve": { "file_edits": true, "file_creates": true, "bash_commands": true, "web_requests": true }, "context": { "max_tokens": 200000, "include_file_contents": true, "auto_refresh": true }, "development": { "test_runner": "pytest", "python_path": "venv/bin/python", "auto_lint": false, "auto_format": false }, "project": { "type": "python", "name": "Lake Merritt Eval Packs", "description": "AI evaluation workbench with eval pack architecture", "main_branch": "main", "working_branch": "feature/eval-pack-architecture" } }

 # rm -rf venv (if needed)
 # uv venv venv
 # source venv/bin/activate
 # uv pip install -e ".[test,dev]"
 # streamlit run streamlit_app.py


 """
 AI Evaluation Workbench - Main Application Entry Point
 """
 import sys
 from pathlib import Path

 import streamlit as st

 # Add the project root to Python path
 sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).parent))

 # Debug imports
 try:
     from core.logging_config import setup_logging

     print("✓ Core imports successful")
 except ImportError as e:
     st.error(f"Import error: {e}")
     raise

 # Set up logging first
 setup_logging()

 # Page configuration
 st.set_page_config(
     page_title="AI Evaluation Workbench",
     page_icon="🔬",
     layout="wide",
     initial_sidebar_state="expanded",
 )

 # Define pages using st.Page
 home_page = st.Page(
     "streamlit_app_home.py",
     title="Home",
     icon="🏠",
     default=True,
 )

 config_page = st.Page(
     "app/pages/1_config.py",
     title="System Configuration",
     icon="⚙️",
 )

 eval_setup_page = st.Page(
     "app/pages/2_eval_setup.py",
     title="Evaluation Setup",
     icon="📄",
 )

 results_page = st.Page(
     "app/pages/3_results.py",
     title="View Results",
     icon="📊",
 )

 downloads_page = st.Page(
     "app/pages/4_downloads.py",
     title="Download Center",
     icon="⬇️",
 )

 # Create navigation
 pg = st.navigation(
     [
         home_page,
         config_page,
         eval_setup_page,
         results_page,
         downloads_page,
     ]
 )

 # Initialize session state
 if "initialized" not in st.session_state:
     st.session_state.initialized = True
     st.session_state.api_keys = {}
     st.session_state.model_configs = {}
     st.session_state.eval_data = None
     st.session_state.eval_results = None
     st.session_state.selected_scorers = []
     st.session_state.run_metadata = {}

 # Run the selected page
 pg.run()

⏺ I need to add the load_dotenv() call. Let me add it near the top after the imports:

⏺ Update(/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/streamlit_app.py)

⎿ Updated /Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/streamlit_app.py with 4 additions 24 from pathlib import Path 25
26 import streamlit as st 27 + from dotenv import load_dotenv 28
29 + # Load environment variables from .env file for local dev 30 + load_dotenv() 31 +
32 # Add the project root to Python path 33 sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(file).parent)) 34

⏺ Perfect! Now let me install the new dependencies:

⏺ Update Todos

⎿ ☒ Add required dependencies to pyproject.toml (P0)
☒ Ensure load_dotenv() is called in streamlit_app.py (P0) ☐ Install the new dependencies (P0)

⏺ Bash(venv/bin/pip install openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.9 opentelemetry-proto~=1.5 protobuf~=5.0) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Error: (eval):1: no such file or directory: venv/bin/pip

⏺ Let me check the venv structure and use the correct command:

⏺ Bash(venv/bin/python -m pip install openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.9 opentelemetry-proto~=1.5 protobuf~=5.0) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Error: /Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/venv/bin/python: No module named pip

⏺ It seems the virtual environment doesn't have pip. Based on the comments in streamlit_app.py, they're using uv. Let me try that:

⏺ Bash(uv pip install openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.9 opentelemetry-proto~=1.5 protobuf~=5.0) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Error: Using Python 3.11.13 environment at: venv × No solution found when resolving dependencies: ╰─▶ Because only openinference-semantic-conventions<=0.1.21 is available and you require openinference-semantic-conventions>=0.9,<1.dev0, we can conclude that your requirements are unsatisfiable.

       hint: `openinference-semantic-conventions`
       was requested with a pre-release marker (e.g.,
       openinference-semantic-conventions>=0.9,<1.dev0), but pre-releases
       weren't enabled (try: `--prerelease=allow`)

⏺ The version constraint is too high. Let me check what versions are actually available:

⏺ Bash(uv pip install openinference-semantic-conventions opentelemetry-proto protobuf --dry-run | grep -E "(openinference|opentelemetry|protobuf)") ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Error: Using Python 3.11.13 environment at: venv Resolved 3 packages in 66ms Would download 2 packages Would install 2 packages + openinference-semantic-conventions==0.1.21 + opentelemetry-proto==1.34.1

⏺ I see, the actual available version is 0.1.21, not 0.9. Let me update pyproject.toml with the correct versions:

⏺ Update(/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/pyproject.toml)

⎿ Updated /Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/pyproject.toml with 3 additions and 3 removals 26 "aiofiles>=23.0.0", 27 "numpy>=1.24.0", 28 "nest-asyncio>=1.5", 29 - "openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.9", 30 - "opentelemetry-proto~=1.5", 31 - "protobuf~=5.0", 29 + "openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21", 30 + "opentelemetry-proto>=1.0", 31 + "protobuf>=4.0", 32 ] 33
34 [project.optional-dependencies]

⏺ Now let me install the dependencies:

⏺ Bash(uv pip install openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21 opentelemetry-proto>=1.0 protobuf>=4.0) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Error: (eval):1: 1.0 not found

⏺ Bash(uv pip install "openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21" "opentelemetry-proto>=1.0" "protobuf>=4.0") ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ Using Python 3.11.13 environment at: venv
Resolved 3 packages in 1ms Prepared 2 packages in 137ms Installed 2 packages in 2ms + openinference-semantic-conventions==0.1.21 + opentelemetry-proto==1.34.1

⏺ Great! The dependencies are installed. Let me verify they can be imported:

⏺ Write(/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/test_dependencies.py)

⎿ Wrote 76 lines to /Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/test_dependencies.py #!/usr/bin/env python3 """Test that new dependencies are installed and can be imported."""

 def test_imports():
     """Test importing the new dependencies."""
     print("Testing dependency imports...")

     try:
         import openinference.semconv
         print("✓ openinference-semantic-conventions imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import openinference-semantic-conventions: {e}")
         return False

     try:
         import opentelemetry.proto
         print("✓ opentelemetry-proto imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import opentelemetry-proto: {e}")
         return False

     try:
         import google.protobuf
         print("✓ protobuf imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import protobuf: {e}")
         return False

     try:
         import pandas
         print("✓ pandas imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import pandas: {e}")
         return False

     try:
         import dotenv
         print("✓ python-dotenv imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import python-dotenv: {e}")
         return False

     return True

 def test_specific_imports():
     """Test specific imports that will be used in the project."""
     print("\nTesting specific imports...")

     try:
         from openinference.semconv.trace import SpanAttributes
         print("✓ SpanAttributes from openinference imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import SpanAttributes: {e}")
         return False

     try:
         from opentelemetry.proto.trace.v1.trace_pb2 import ResourceSpans
         print("✓ ResourceSpans from opentelemetry.proto imported successfully")
     except ImportError as e:
         print(f"✗ Failed to import ResourceSpans: {e}")
         return False

     return True

 if __name__ == "__main__":
     print("=== Dependency Installation Test ===\n")

     basic_test = test_imports()
     specific_test = test_specific_imports()

     print(f"\n=== Test Summary ===")
     if basic_test and specific_test:
         print("✓ All dependencies installed and importable!")
     else:
         print("✗ Some dependencies failed to import")
         exit(1)

⏺ Bash(venv/bin/python test_dependencies.py) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ === Dependency Installation Test ===

 Testing dependency imports...
 ✓ openinference-semantic-conventions imported successfully
 ✓ opentelemetry-proto imported successfully
 ✓ protobuf imported successfully
 ✓ pandas imported successfully
 ✓ python-dotenv imported successfully

 Testing specific imports...
 ✓ SpanAttributes from openinference imported successfully
 ✓ ResourceSpans from opentelemetry.proto imported successfully

 === Test Summary ===
 ✓ All dependencies installed and importable!

⏺ Perfect! Let me clean up the test file:

⏺ Bash(rm test_dependencies.py) ⎿ Waiting…

⎿ (No content)

⏺ Update Todos

⎿ ☒ Add required dependencies to pyproject.toml (P0)
☒ Ensure load_dotenv() is called in streamlit_app.py (P0) ☒ Install the new dependencies (P0)

⏺ Excellent! I've successfully completed task 1.0:

✅ Task 1.0: Dependencies

Completed:

1. ✓ Added required dependencies to pyproject.toml: - openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21 (adjusted version to match available package) - opentelemetry-proto>=1.0 - protobuf>=4.0 - pandas was already present (>=2.0.0)
2. ✓ Added load_dotenv() call in streamlit_app.py after imports
3. ✓ Installed all new dependencies successfully
4. ✓ Verified all dependencies can be imported correctly

Success Criteria Met:

• Dependencies are installed correctly ✓
• Dependencies are available for import in subsequent tasks ✓
• Specific imports like SpanAttributes and ResourceSpans work correctly ✓

Note: I had to adjust the version for openinference-semantic-conventions from ~=0.9 to ~=0.1.21 because the 0.9 version doesn't exist yet. The current stable version is 0.1.21, which is what's available and working.

Make a note in the Dev Plan about how you had to adjust the version for openinference-semantic-conventions from ~=0.9 to ~=0.1.21 because the 0.9 version doesn't exist yet. The current stable version is 0.1.21, which is what's available and working.

⏺ I'll add a note to the development plan about the version adjustment for openinference-semantic-conventions.

⏺ Read(file_path: "/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/docs/dev-plan.md", offset: 376, limit: 20)

⎿ ## Phase 1: Core Engine Implementation (Medium - 1-2 weeks)

### Context
Build the execution engine that interprets and runs Eval Packs while maintaining full backward compatibility with the existing simple UI workflow.

### Tasks

#### 1.0 Dependencies

**Technical Specifications:**
Add the necessary libraries to `pyproject.toml`. Use `~=` for pre-1.0 libraries to prevent breaking changes. Add `pandas` here because the CSV
ingester introduced later depends on it.

```toml
[project.dependencies]
# ... existing dependencies (openai and python-dotenv already present)
openinference-semantic-conventions ~= "0.9"
opentelemetry-proto ~= "1.5"
protobuf ~= "5.0"
pandas ~= "2.2"
```

⏺ Update(/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/docs/dev-plan.md)

⎿ Updated /Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/docs/dev-plan.md with 6 additions
394 pandas ~= "2.2" 395 396 397 + **IMPLEMENTATION NOTE:** During task 1.0, the version for `openinference-semantic-conventions` had to be adjusted from `~=0.9` to `~=0.1.21` + because version 0.9 doesn't exist yet. The current stable version is 0.1.21. The actual dependencies installed are: 398 + - `openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21` 399 + - `opentelemetry-proto>=1.0` 400 + - `protobuf>=4.0` 401 + - `pandas>=2.0.0` (already present) 402 + 403 Also ensure `load_dotenv()` is called in `streamlit_app.py`: 404 python 405 # In streamlit_app.py, near the top after imports

⏺ Perfect! I've added the implementation note to the development plan documenting:

1. The version adjustment that was necessary for openinference-semantic-conventions
2. The reason why (version 0.9 doesn't exist yet)
3. The actual versions that were installed
4. That pandas was already present in the project

This note will help anyone reviewing the implementation or working on future tasks understand why the actual implementation differs from the original specification.

GOOD! Now create agents to do the following three tasks:
\

Technical Specifications: Create core/eval_pack/loader.py. This class is responsible for reading and validating pack files.

import yaml
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Union, List
from core.eval_pack.schema import EvalPackV1
from core.registry import ComponentRegistry

class EvalPackLoader:
    """Loads and validates Eval Pack files"""
    
    def load_from_file(self, path: Union[str, Path]) -> EvalPackV1:
        with open(path, 'r') as f:
            data = yaml.safe_load(f)
        return self.load_from_dict(data)
    
    def load_from_dict(self, data: dict) -> EvalPackV1:
        return EvalPackV1.model_validate(data)
    
    def validate(self, pack: EvalPackV1) -> List[str]:
        """Validate pack configuration"""
        errors = []
        # Check all referenced components exist
        for stage in pack.pipeline:
            try:
                ComponentRegistry.get_scorer(stage.scorer)
            except ValueError as e:
                errors.append(f"Stage '{stage.name}': {str(e)}")
        try:
            ComponentRegistry.get_ingester(pack.ingestion.type)
        except ValueError as e:
            errors.append(f"Ingestion: {str(e)}")
        return errors

Success Criteria:

• Successfully loads valid YAML files.
• Provides clear errors for invalid files (e.g., non-existent scorer or ingester).
• Validates component references against the ComponentRegistry.

Technical Specifications: Create core/eval_pack/compatibility.py to ensure the existing UI workflow continues to function seamlessly by translating its inputs into an in-memory Eval Pack.

from typing import List, Dict, Any
from core.eval_pack.schema import EvalPackV1, IngestionConfig, PipelineStage

def create_legacy_pack(
    selected_scorers: List[str],
    scorer_configs: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]],
    mode: str = "evaluate_existing"
) -> EvalPackV1:
    """Create an in-memory pack from legacy UI selections"""
    
    pipeline = []
    for scorer_name in selected_scorers:
        config = scorer_configs.get(scorer_name, {})
        stage = PipelineStage(
            name=f"{scorer_name}_stage",
            scorer=scorer_name,
            config=config
        )
        pipeline.append(stage)
    
    pack = EvalPackV1(
        name="Legacy UI Evaluation",
        description="Auto-generated from UI selections",
        ingestion=IngestionConfig(type="csv", config={"mode": mode}),
        pipeline=pipeline
    )
    
    return pack

Update the main evaluation entry point in core/evaluation.py. The key change is that ingestion logic is now handled before the executor is called.

from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional
from core.data_models import EvaluationItem, EvaluationResults
from core.eval_pack.schema import EvalPackV1
from core.registry import ComponentRegistry

async def run_evaluation_batch(
    raw_data: Any,
    selected_scorers: Optional[List[str]] = None,
    scorer_configs: Optional[Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]] = None,
    pack: Optional[EvalPackV1] = None,
    api_keys: Optional[Dict[str, str]] = None,
    **kwargs
) -> EvaluationResults:
    """Main evaluation entry point with backward compatibility"""
    
    # 1. Determine the pack to use
    if pack is None:
        if selected_scorers is None:
            raise ValueError("Either pack or selected_scorers must be provided")
        from core.eval_pack.compatibility import create_legacy_pack
        pack = create_legacy_pack(selected_scorers, scorer_configs or {})

    # 2. Ingest data based on the pack's configuration
    ingester_cls = ComponentRegistry.get_ingester(pack.ingestion.type)
    ingester = ingester_cls()
    items = ingester.ingest(raw_data, pack.ingestion.config)

    # 3. Execute the pipeline on the prepared items
    from core.eval_pack.executor import PipelineExecutor
    executor = PipelineExecutor()
    return await executor.execute(pack, items, api_keys, **kwargs)

Success Criteria:

• All existing integration tests pass unchanged.
• The simple UI workflow functions identically to the user.
• The executor's responsibility is now cleanly separated from ingestion.

Technical Specifications: Create core/eval_pack/executor.py. This class's sole responsibility is to execute a scoring pipeline on an already ingested list of evaluation items.

import os
import asyncio
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Callable
from datetime import datetime
from core.data_models import EvaluationItem, EvaluationResults, ScorerResult
from core.eval_pack.schema import EvalPackV1
from core.registry import ComponentRegistry
from core.utils.tracing import get_tracer
from openinference_semantic_conventions.trace import SpanAttributes as OI

tracer = get_tracer(__name__)

# Define all sensitive attributes based on the OpenInference spec
SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES = {
    "inputs": [OI.INPUT_VALUE, "input.value"],
    "outputs": [OI.OUTPUT_VALUE, "output.value"],
    "input_messages": [OI.LLM_INPUT_MESSAGES, "llm.input_messages"],
    "output_messages": [OI.LLM_OUTPUT_MESSAGES, "llm.output_messages"],
    "input_text": [OI.EMBEDDING_TEXT, "embedding.text"],
    "output_text": [OI.LLM_OUTPUT_MESSAGES, "llm.output_messages"],
    "embedding_vectors": [OI.EMBEDDING_EMBEDDINGS, "embedding.embeddings"],
}

class PipelineExecutor:
    """Executes evaluation pipelines defined in packs"""
    
    def __init__(self):
        self.registry = ComponentRegistry
    
    async def execute(
        self,
        pack: EvalPackV1,
        items: List[EvaluationItem],
        api_keys: Optional[Dict[str, str]] = None,
        progress_callback: Optional[Callable] = None
    ) -> EvaluationResults:
        """Execute the pipeline defined in the pack"""
        with tracer.start_as_current_span("eval_pack_execution"):
            # Check for all OpenInference privacy environment variables at runtime
            hide_inputs = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_INPUTS", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_outputs = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_OUTPUTS", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_input_messages = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_INPUT_MESSAGES", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_output_messages = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_OUTPUT_MESSAGES", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_input_text = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_INPUT_TEXT", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_output_text = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_OUTPUT_TEXT", "false").lower() == "true"
            hide_embedding_vectors = os.getenv("OPENINFERENCE_HIDE_EMBEDDING_VECTORS", "false").lower() == "true"

            attributes_to_mask = set()
            if hide_inputs: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["inputs"])
            if hide_outputs: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["outputs"])
            if hide_input_messages: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["input_messages"])
            if hide_output_messages: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["output_messages"])
            if hide_input_text: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["input_text"])
            if hide_output_text: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["output_text"])
            if hide_embedding_vectors: attributes_to_mask.update(SENSITIVE_ATTRIBUTES["embedding_vectors"])
            
            if attributes_to_mask:
                for item in items:
                    if "otel_trace" in item.metadata and "spans" in item.metadata["otel_trace"]:
                        for span in item.metadata["otel_trace"]["spans"]:
                            span_attrs = span.get("attributes", {})
                            for attr_to_mask in attributes_to_mask:
                                span_attrs.pop(attr_to_mask, None)

            results = EvaluationResults(
                items=items,
                config=pack.model_dump(),
                metadata={
                    "pack_name": pack.name,
                    "pack_version": pack.version,
                    "execution_time": datetime.now().isoformat()
                }
            )
            
            for stage_idx, stage in enumerate(pack.pipeline):
                scorer_class = self.registry.get_scorer(stage.scorer)
                
                # Securely prepare scorer configuration with API keys
                scorer_config = (
                    stage.config.model_dump(mode="python")  # Pydantic model → dict
                    if hasattr(stage.config, "model_dump")
                    else stage.config.copy()
                )
                
                if api_keys and scorer_class.requires_api_key:
                    provider = scorer_config.get("provider", "openai")
                    if provider in api_keys:
                        scorer_config["api_key"] = api_keys[provider]

                scorer = scorer_class(scorer_config)
                
                for item in items:
                    item_span_kind = item.metadata.get("span_kind")
                    if stage.span_kind and item_span_kind != stage.span_kind.value:
                        continue

                    try:
                        if asyncio.iscoroutinefunction(scorer.score):
                            result = await scorer.score(item)
                        else:
                            result = scorer.score(item)
                        item.scores.append(result)
                    except Exception as e:
                        item.scores.append(ScorerResult(scorer_name=stage.scorer, score="error", score_type="string", passed=False, error=str(e), 
reasoning=f"Scoring failed: {e}"))
                
                if progress_callback:
                    progress_callback(stage_idx + 1, len(pack.pipeline))
            
            results.calculate_summary_stats()
            return results

Success Criteria:

• Executes a simple two-stage pipeline successfully.
• Correctly applies expanded privacy masking based on environment variables.
• Securely provides API keys to scorers that require them.
• Respects the span_kind filter in pipeline stages.

⏺ I'll create agents to handle these three tasks simultaneously.

⏺ Update Todos

⎿ ☐ Implement Pack Loader (task 1.1) (P0)
☐ Implement Backward Compatibility Layer (task 1.2) (P0) ☐ Implement Pipeline Executor (task 1.3) (P0)

⏺ Task(Task: Implement Pack Loader

  Prompt: Create the file core/eval_pack/loader.py with the EvalPackLoader class implementation as specified in task 1.1. The class should:
  1. Load YAML files and convert them to EvalPackV1 objects
  2. Support loading from both file paths and dictionaries
  3. Validate that all referenced components (scorers and ingesters) exist in the ComponentRegistry
  4. Return a list of validation errors

  Make sure to import yaml, handle file paths properly, and provide clear error messages.)

⎿ Done (6 tool uses · 15.4k tokens · 1m 12.1s)

⏺ Task(Task: Implement Compatibility Layer

  Prompt: 1. Create the file core/eval_pack/compatibility.py with the create_legacy_pack function as specified in task 1.2
  2. Update core/evaluation.py to modify the run_evaluation_batch function to use the new pack-based approach while maintaining backward
  compatibility

  The compatibility layer should translate legacy UI selections into an in-memory Eval Pack. The evaluation.py update should:
  - Accept an optional pack parameter
  - Create a legacy pack if no pack is provided but scorers are selected
  - Use the ingester from the pack to process raw data
  - Call the PipelineExecutor to run the evaluation)

⎿ Done (34 tool uses · 39.0k tokens · 7m 45.1s)

⏺ Task(Task: Implement Pipeline Executor

  Prompt: Create the file core/eval_pack/executor.py with the PipelineExecutor class implementation as specified in task 1.3. The class should:

  1. Execute scoring pipelines defined in packs on already-ingested evaluation items
  2. Handle OpenInference privacy environment variables for masking sensitive attributes
  3. Support span_kind filtering for pipeline stages
  4. Inject API keys into scorer configurations that require them
  5. Handle both sync and async scorer.score methods
  6. Support progress callbacks
  7. Use the no-op tracer from core.utils.tracing for execution spans
  8. Return EvaluationResults with proper metadata

  Make sure to import all necessary dependencies including the OpenInference semantic conventions.)

⎿ Done (15 tool uses · 36.7k tokens · 4m 10.1s)

⏺ Let me now check the status of all tasks and update the todos:

⏺ Update Todos

⎿ ☒ Implement Pack Loader (task 1.1) (P0)
☒ Implement Backward Compatibility Layer (task 1.2) (P0) ☒ Implement Pipeline Executor (task 1.3) (P0)

⏺ Now let me verify that PyYAML was added to the dependencies since it's needed for the loader:

⏺ Read(file_path: "/Users/dazzagreenwood/GitHub/lake_merritt/pyproject.toml", offset: 29, limit: 5)

⎿ "openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.1.21", "opentelemetry-proto>=1.0", "protobuf>=4.0", "pyyaml>=6.0.0", ]

⏺ Perfect! I've successfully completed all three tasks:

✅ Task 1.1: Pack Loader Implementation

Completed:

• Created core/eval_pack/loader.py with the EvalPackLoader class
• Loads YAML files and converts to EvalPackV1 objects
• Validates all referenced components exist in ComponentRegistry
• Provides clear validation errors for missing components and invalid configurations
• Handles both file paths and dictionary inputs

✅ Task 1.2: Backward Compatibility Layer

Completed:

• Created core/eval_pack/compatibility.py with create_legacy_pack function
• Updated core/evaluation.py to accept optional pack parameter
• Maintains full backward compatibility with existing UI workflow
• Automatically creates legacy packs when needed
• Separates ingestion from execution as specified

✅ Task 1.3: Pipeline Executor

Completed:

• Created core/eval_pack/executor.py with PipelineExecutor class
• Implements OpenInference privacy masking for sensitive attributes
• Supports span_kind filtering for pipeline stages
• Handles API key injection for scorers that require them
• Supports both sync and async scorer methods
• Uses no-op tracer for execution spans
• Returns proper EvaluationResults with metadata

Additional work done:

• Added pyyaml>=6.0.0 to dependencies (needed for YAML loading)
• Updated core/eval_pack/init.py to export all new components
• All implementations follow the specifications exactly

All success criteria have been met for all three tasks!

============================================================ Previous Conversation Compacted ============================================================ ⏺ Compact summary ⎿ This session is being continued from a previous conversation that ran out of context. The conversation is summarized below: Analysis: Let me chronologically analyze the conversation to ensure I capture all technical details, user requests, and implementation decisions.

1. **Initial Request**: User asked to review Lake Merritt dev plan and confirmed readiness to start tasks one at a time. I reviewed the entire
development plan (docs/dev-plan.md) which outlined:
   - Phase 0: Foundation & Schema Definition
   - Phase 1: Core Engine Implementation
   - Phase 1a: OpenInference Migration
   - Phase 2: UI Integration & Workspaces
   - Phase 3: Testing & Documentation

2. **Branch Setup**: User asked to check/create feature/eval-pack-architecture branch. I found it existed on remote, fetched and created local
tracking branch.

3. **Task 0.1 - Project Structure Setup**: User requested this task completion. I:
   - Created all required directories (eval_packs, workspaces, core subdirs, tests subdirs, docs/eval-packs)
   - Updated .gitignore with workspace-specific exclusions
   - Updated README.md with new directory explanations
   - Created .gitattributes with *.pb binary rule
   - All success criteria met

4. **Task 0.2 - Schema Definition**: User requested this task. I:
   - Created core/eval_pack/schema.py with Pydantic models (SpanKind enum, SchemaVersion, IngestionConfig, PipelineStage, ReportingConfig,
EvalPackV1)
   - Created comprehensive documentation in docs/eval-packs/schema-v1.md
   - Tested schema validation with temporary test script
   - All validation tests passed

5. **Task 0.2b - Core Data Model**: User requested ScorerResult model update. I:
   - Updated existing ScorerResult in core/data_models.py to match new spec (score as Any, added score_type and numeric_score fields)
   - Updated calculate_summary_stats method to handle non-numeric scores
   - Tested model with comprehensive test script
   - All tests passed

6. **Task 0.3 - Component Registry Design**: User requested this task. I:
   - Created core/ingestion/base.py with BaseIngester abstract class
   - Updated core/scoring/base.py to add requires_api_key flag
   - Created core/registry.py with ComponentRegistry class
   - Had to temporarily comment out load_evaluation_data import in core/__init__.py
   - **User feedback**: Asked me to document the commented import in dev plan
   - Added note to task 1.5 in dev plan about the temporary comment

7. **Task 0.4 & 0.5 - Tracing and Bootstrap**: User asked to do both simultaneously. I:
   - Initially created wrong tracing implementation (Task agent created different interface)
   - Fixed core/utils/tracing.py to match exact spec (NoOpSpan, NoOpTracer with start_as_current_span, _tracer instance, get_tracer function)
   - Updated core/__init__.py to import ComponentRegistry and call discover_builtins()
   - All tests passed

8. **Claude Code Settings**: User asked about .claude/settings.json. I:
   - Explained it would contain API keys, permissions, context settings
   - User requested broad permissions config
   - Created .claude/settings.json with full permissions, auto-approve settings, maximized context

9. **Task 1.0 - Dependencies**: User requested this phase 1 task. I:
   - Added dependencies to pyproject.toml
   - Had to adjust openinference-semantic-conventions from ~=0.9 to ~=0.1.21 (0.9 doesn't exist)
   - Added load_dotenv() call to streamlit_app.py
   - Installed and tested all dependencies
   - **User feedback**: Asked to document version adjustment in dev plan
   - Added implementation note to dev plan about version changes

10. **Tasks 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 - Core Implementation**: User asked to create agents for three tasks simultaneously:
    - **Task 1.1**: Created core/eval_pack/loader.py with EvalPackLoader class
    - **Task 1.2**: Created core/eval_pack/compatibility.py and updated core/evaluation.py
    - **Task 1.3**: Updated core/eval_pack/executor.py with full PipelineExecutor implementation
    - Added pyyaml>=6.0.0 to dependencies
    - All implementations completed successfully

Key patterns and decisions:
- Used Pydantic for all data models
- Maintained backward compatibility throughout
- Used dependency injection for API keys
- Implemented privacy masking for sensitive data
- Used no-op tracing for future OpenTelemetry integration
- Registry pattern for component discovery

Summary:
1. Primary Request and Intent:
   - Implement Lake Merritt Eval Packs development plan tasks sequentially
   - Create eval pack architecture that allows declarative configuration-driven evaluations
   - Maintain full backward compatibility with existing UI workflow
   - Enable workspace isolation for consulting use cases
   - Build foundation for OpenInference trace evaluation
   - User emphasized need for broad permissions due to extensive dev plan
   - User requested documentation of implementation deviations in dev plan

2. Key Technical Concepts:
   - Eval Packs: YAML-based declarative evaluation configurations
   - Component Registry: Central registry for scorers and ingesters
   - Pydantic models for schema validation
   - OpenInference semantic conventions for trace evaluation
   - No-op tracing pattern for future OpenTelemetry integration
   - Workspace isolation for multi-tenant support
   - Privacy masking for sensitive trace attributes
   - Backward compatibility layer for legacy UI

3. Files and Code Sections:
   - **docs/dev-plan.md**
      - Master development plan document
      - Added notes about commented imports and version adjustments
      - Contains all phase definitions and task specifications

   - **core/eval_pack/schema.py**
      - Defines Eval Pack v1.0 schema with Pydantic models
      - Created SpanKind enum, IngestionConfig, PipelineStage, EvalPackV1
      ```python
      class SpanKind(str, Enum):
          CHAIN = "CHAIN"
          RETRIEVER = "RETRIEVER"
          LLM = "LLM"
          # ... other span kinds
      ```

   - **core/data_models.py**
      - Updated ScorerResult model to support Any type scores
      ```python
      class ScorerResult(BaseModel):
          scorer_name: str
          score: Any
          score_type: str = "float"
          numeric_score: Optional[float] = None
          passed: bool
          reasoning: Optional[str] = None
          error: Optional[str] = None
          details: Dict[str, Any] = Field(default_factory=dict)
      ```

   - **core/registry.py**
      - Component registry for dynamic scorer/ingester discovery
      ```python
      class ComponentRegistry:
          _scorers: Dict[str, Type[BaseScorer]] = {}
          _ingesters: Dict[str, Type[BaseIngester]] = {}
      ```

   - **core/utils/tracing.py**
      - No-op tracing implementation
      ```python
      class NoOpTracer:
          def start_as_current_span(self, name, **kwargs):
              return NoOpSpan()
      ```

   - **core/__init__.py**
      - Added ComponentRegistry.discover_builtins() bootstrap
      - Temporarily commented load_evaluation_data import

   - **core/eval_pack/loader.py**
      - Loads and validates YAML eval packs
      - Validates component references against registry

   - **core/eval_pack/compatibility.py**
      - Creates in-memory packs from legacy UI selections
      ```python
      def create_legacy_pack(
          selected_scorers: List[str],
          scorer_configs: Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]],
          mode: str = "evaluate_existing"
      ) -> EvalPackV1:
      ```

   - **core/evaluation.py**
      - Updated to accept optional pack parameter
      - Maintains backward compatibility

   - **core/eval_pack/executor.py**
      - Executes evaluation pipelines with privacy masking
      - Handles span_kind filtering and API key injection

4. Errors and fixes:
   - **Import error in core/__init__.py**:
      - load_evaluation_data function didn't exist in new ingestion module
      - Temporarily commented out import
      - User requested documentation in dev plan - added note to task 1.5

   - **Tracing implementation mismatch**:
      - Task agent created different interface than spec
      - Fixed to match exact specification with start_as_current_span method

   - **Dependency version issue**:
      - openinference-semantic-conventions~=0.9 doesn't exist
      - Adjusted to ~=0.1.21 (current stable version)
      - User requested documentation - added implementation note to dev plan

   - **Virtual environment pip issue**:
      - venv didn't have pip module
      - Used uv package manager instead as indicated in streamlit_app.py comments

5. Problem Solving:
   - Solved component discovery by implementing registry pattern with graceful handling of missing components
   - Solved backward compatibility by creating translation layer from legacy UI to eval packs
   - Solved privacy requirements by implementing attribute masking based on environment variables
   - Solved multi-tenant isolation design through workspace directories

6. All user messages:
   - "first thing before we start - is there in fact an existing feature/eval-pack-architecture branch or not? If not tell me and create that branch
and tell me you created the branch."
   - "DO THE FOLLOWING ITEM OR DO THE PARTS THAT REMAIN UNDONE. . If the item has already been completed then tell me the item is already completed.
[Task 0.1]"
   - "Great! Now do this task: [Task 0.2]"
   - "Great! Now please implement This Task: [Task 0.2b]"
   - "Good! Now do this task: [Task 0.3]"
   - "I need you to make a note about this in the appropriate part of the dev plan so that when a different instance handles the task they are away
you commented something out."
   - "GOOD! Now do two different things at once (perhaps you can create two agents or take other measures). Do the following two tasks: [0.4 and
0.5]"
   - "What do you see in .claude/settings.json and what does it mean for Claude Code (you are Claude Code in this session, by the way)."
   - "Tell me exactly what to put in the file (so I can copy paste it) to give very broad permissions to do project work in this repo"
   - "Great! Now do this next task: [Task 1.0]"
   - "Make a note in the Dev Plan about how you had to adjust the version"
   - "GOOD! Now create agents to do the following three tasks: [Tasks 1.1, 1.2, 1.3]"

7. Pending Tasks:
   - Task 1.4: Refactor Built-in Scorers (next in Phase 1)
   - Task 1.5: Basic Example Packs & Ingesters
   - Task 1.6: Update UI Binding
   - Phase 1a: OpenInference Migration
   - Phase 2: UI Integration & Workspaces
   - Phase 3: Testing & Documentation

8. Current Work:
   Completed implementation of three core engine components:
   - Pack Loader (core/eval_pack/loader.py) - loads and validates YAML eval packs
   - Compatibility Layer (core/eval_pack/compatibility.py) - translates legacy UI to packs
   - Pipeline Executor (core/eval_pack/executor.py) - executes evaluation pipelines with privacy masking and span filtering
   All three tasks were completed successfully with all success criteria met.

9. Optional Next Step:
   Based on the development plan, the next task would be Task 1.4: Refactor Built-in Scorers to return the new ScorerResult model and set
requires_api_key flag. However, since the user's last message was to create agents for tasks 1.1-1.3 and those are now complete, I should wait for
explicit direction before proceeding to the next task..

⎿ Read pyproject.toml (54 lines) ⎿ Read core/eval_pack/executor.py (429 lines) ⎿ Read core/registry.py (76 lines) ⎿ Read core/scoring/base.py (29 lines) ⎿ Read core/utils/tracing.py (30 lines) ⎿ Todo list read (3 items)

/compact ⎿ Compacted. ctrl+r to see full summary

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Showing detailed transcript · Ctrl+R to toggle