scientific standards - zfifteen/unified-framework GitHub Wiki

Scientific Standards

Scientific methodology and standards for Z Framework research.

Overview

This document outlines the scientific standards and methodological requirements for research conducted within the Z Framework project.

Research Methodology

Empirical Validation Standards

  • Statistical Significance: p < 0.05 with multiple testing corrections
  • Effect Size Reporting: Cohen's d and confidence intervals required
  • Reproducibility: All analyses must be independently reproducible
  • Sample Size: Power analysis for adequate sample sizes

Mathematical Rigor

  • Proof Requirements: Formal mathematical proofs for theoretical claims
  • Computational Validation: Cross-validation across multiple implementations
  • Precision Standards: High-precision arithmetic (mpmath dps=50) for critical calculations
  • Error Analysis: Comprehensive error propagation analysis

Data Quality Standards

  • Data Integrity: Verified data sources and preprocessing protocols
  • Version Control: Complete version tracking for datasets and analysis
  • Documentation: Comprehensive metadata and provenance tracking
  • Validation: Independent verification of data quality

Publication Standards

Peer Review Process

  • Internal Review: Technical review by framework maintainers
  • External Review: Independent review by domain experts
  • Community Review: Open review process for major claims
  • Revision Process: Iterative improvement based on feedback

Documentation Requirements

  • Complete Methodology: Detailed description of all procedures
  • Statistical Analysis: Full statistical analysis protocols
  • Limitations: Clear acknowledgment of limitations and assumptions
  • Reproducibility: Complete instructions for reproduction

Ethical Standards

  • Transparency: Open disclosure of methods and potential conflicts
  • Attribution: Proper attribution of contributions and prior work
  • Collaboration: Respectful and inclusive collaboration practices
  • Integrity: Honest reporting of results including negative findings

Quality Assurance

Validation Protocols

  • Multiple Validation: Independent validation by multiple researchers
  • Cross-Platform Testing: Validation across different computational environments
  • Long-term Monitoring: Ongoing validation of published results
  • Community Verification: Open community verification processes

Continuous Improvement

  • Regular Updates: Regular review and updating of standards
  • Community Input: Integration of community feedback and suggestions
  • Best Practice Evolution: Adoption of emerging best practices
  • Training Programs: Ongoing training in scientific methodology

See Also

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️