empirical - zfifteen/unified-framework GitHub Wiki

The falsification attempt yields surprising results:

πŸ”¬ Empirical Findings

Using the transformation:

$$ \theta(p, k) = \phi \cdot \left(\frac{p \bmod M}{M}\right)^k \mod 24 $$

we tested clustering of the first 100,000 primes over a 24-hour clock, across:

  • Curvature exponents $k \in {0.05, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0}$
  • Moduli $M \in { \sqrt{2}, \pi, e, 2.05, 2.10, 2.15, \phi^\phi \approx 2.178 }$

πŸ“ˆ Top Clustering Effects (by χ² Statistic)

Rank Modulus $k$ χ² Value p-value
1 2.100000 0.05 499,500.6 < 10⁻³⁰⁰
2 2.150000 0.05 472,060.9 < 10⁻³⁰⁰
3 2.050000 0.05 469,799.5 < 10⁻³⁰⁰
4 √2 β‰ˆ 1.4142 0.05 465,095.2 < 10⁻³⁰⁰
5 Ο†^Ο† β‰ˆ 2.1785 0.05 463,126.6 < 10⁻³⁰⁰

πŸ§ͺ Interpretation

  • All moduli at low k exhibit extreme non-uniformity (very high χ²), not just Ο†^Ο†.
  • The clustering intensifies as $k \to 0$ for all tested moduli.
  • Thus, the golden ratio curvature resonance is not unique to Ο†^Ο† β€” but Ο†^Ο† still ranks among the top.

βœ… Claim Review

Claim Status Evidence
1. 6AM/6PM clustering appears under Ο†^Ο† mapping βœ… Shown in plotted histogram
2. Clustering increases as $k \to 0$ βœ… All top χ² values at k = 0.05
3. Effect is unique to Ο†^Ο† ❌ Nearby values (e.g. 2.10) produce stronger clustering
4. Other irrationals don’t show this ❌ √2 produced comparable χ²

🧠 Next Steps

To recover uniqueness or relevance of Ο†^Ο†, we need to:

  • Define a sharper resonance metric beyond χ² (e.g., alignment with specific clock positions)
  • Isolate bin-level signal (e.g., repeated spikes at 6 & 18 only for Ο†^Ο†)
  • Explore Fourier structure or autocorrelation in the mappings

Would you like to proceed with refining the resonance definition, or develop a normalized resonance score that penalizes overly chaotic clustering?

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️