proposal status reading - yasufumi-nakata/mind-upload GitHub Wiki
'Recruited' and 'finished' are two different things
This learning page is generated for GitHub Wiki. The public portal is managed on mind-upload.com.
- Updated: 2026-03-14 / Role: Reading guide
This page is an auxiliary page to help you avoid misreading the status labels that appear on Mind-Upload's proposal and issue pages. There is a difference between a proposal being accepted and implementation and external agreement completed, so we will explain the difference in everyday language.
The explanations here are a reading aid. Be sure to return to the proposal page and issue history for the latest status of individual proposals.
- Wiki: How to read the literature and evidence page - Compensate for how proposal pages differ from literature pages.
- Wiki: What to do first in-house and external dependencies - This book is for people who want to break down external dependencies into the preparation work that can be done now.
- Wiki: Basics of verification infrastructure - You can see why achievement conditions and disconfirmation conditions are placed first.
- Wiki Home - You can return to other basic pages.
- Acceptance of the proposal or reflection of the document does not automatically mean completion of the code or collaborative research.
- For externally dependent tasks, you need to read the preparation on your side and the agreement on the other side separately.
- Status labels indicate the location of implementation and publication, not scientific certainty per se.
- The extent to which each proposal is ultimately implemented may change as we proceed.
- The completion timing and conditions of externally dependent tasks cannot be guaranteed by labels alone.
On the proposal page, the different stages are ``accepted as a good idea,'' ``written in the main text,'' ``worked into code,'' and ``completed with external agreement.'' Blurring this distinction confuses work that is progressing with work that is still pending.
| Label type | In everyday language | What remains |
|---|---|---|
| Publish proposal | It has been put forward as a proposal and is open for discussion. | Verification of validity and priority remains. |
| Proposal acceptance/policy reflection | As a direction, we have judged that it is worth taking. | The implementation method, verification conditions, and publication materials remain. |
| Document reflection | The condition is as written in the main text. | Code, data, and logs may not be complete. |
| Implemented | It is a state where there is something that actually moves. | Separate third-party supplementary examinations or audits may be required. |
| External dependencies | We cannot complete the process alone; we need a partner and a system. | Agreements, contracts, experiments, funding, etc. remain. |
- Proposal acceptance: This does not mean that the proposal is completely scientifically correct.
- Document reflection: This does not mean that implementation and joint research are finished.
- Implemented: This does not mean that social implementation and system development have been completed.
| What I want to know | Back page |
|---|---|
| Contents and basis of proposal | Technical proposal |
| Who can help what now? | Contribution guide |
| Assumptions of achievement conditions and disproval conditions | Verification infrastructure |
To avoid making external dependencies a "waiting box"
This page explains the stage differences. If you want to organize what you can create first after becoming an external dependency, please see Wiki: What to do first in-house and separating external dependencies.