Difference between Terylene and Mirai botnet

Terylene	Mirai botnet
spread through local network	cant spread through local network
faster worm	slower worm
able to mitigate	unable to mitigate
stream socket attacks	raw socket attacks
targets almost all linux distro	targets all linux distro
smarter Ddos techniques	old school ddos techniques
only targets one architecture	targets all architecture

Terylene vs Mirai Summary

Mirai is able to target a wide range of IOT devices, however terylene is able to target the architecture that it is built in (because golang doesnt support cross compilation with C) . On the other hand Terylene has faster worm spreading rate than mirai, better traffic control, and smarter Ddos techniques. Terylene is the best botnet to infect powerful servers, while Mirai can infect all types of IOTs.

Difference between ZeroC2 and Mirai C2

ZeroC2	Mirai C2
Decentralized	Centralized
Fast flux and dynamic ip	Static ip
High Fault tolerance	little fault tolerance
botnet authentication	No authentication
fast messaging library	builtin net libraries

ZeroC2 vs Mirai C2 Summary

ZeroC2 incorporates advanced features like "Mother Priority" for redundancy, "Backoff and Retry" for resilience, and "Transfer or Migration" for evasion. These features are tailored for the efficient management of botnets. ZeroC2 allows a decentralized infrastructure to avoid detection and takedown efforts, while legitimate C2 servers are typically centralized and well-managed. ZeroC2 also secret messages to verify other ZeroC2 servers, preventing migration to honeypots or invalid locations, Legitimate C2 servers rely on standard authentication and verification practices for authorized access.