10. Multimodal AI Reference Architecture - stanlypoc/AIRA GitHub Wiki
Multimodal AI Reference Architecture
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This reference architecture provides a vendor-agnostic framework for implementing multimodal AI systems across three maturity levels with detailed cloud and open-source implementation patterns.
1.2 Audience
- AI/ML Architects
- Data Engineering Teams
- Cloud Solution Architects
- MLOps Engineers
2. Architectural Principles
2.1 Fundamental Principles of Multimodal AI
- Cross-Modal Understanding – AI should interpret and synthesize information across different modalities to provide richer insights.
- Fusion Strategies – Employ early, late, or hybrid fusion methods to combine data effectively while preserving meaning.
- Context Awareness – Models must recognize dependencies between different modalities to improve accuracy and coherence.
- Ethical AI Design – Ensure fairness, bias mitigation, explainability, and responsible AI development practices.
- Scalability & Efficiency – Optimize processing pipelines for low latency and high throughput across multimodal data.
- Robustness & Adaptability – Build architectures that are resilient to noisy, missing, or conflicting data sources.
- Human-AI Synergy – AI should augment human capabilities, rather than replace them, ensuring practical real-world applications.
- Security & Privacy – Protect multimodal data with strong encryption, access control, and ethical handling practices.
2.2 Core Tenets
- Modularity: Independent processing pipelines for each modality (text, image, audio) with standardized interfaces
- Interoperability: Shared embedding spaces and cross-modal attention mechanisms
- Scalability: Horizontal scaling capability for each modality processor
- Observability: Unified monitoring across all modality pipelines
- Ethical By Design: Built-in bias detection and explainability features
2.3 Compliance Framework
- Security: ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II
- Ethics: IEEE 7000-2021, EU AI Act
- Operations: Zero-trust architecture, encrypted modality pipelines
3. Architecture by Technology Level
3.1 Level 2 (Basic) - Rule-Based Fusion
Description:
Coordinated unimodal pipelines with deterministic fusion rules. Processes modalities independently and combines outputs using predefined logic (e.g., weighted averages, boolean operations). Suitable for batch processing scenarios with stable modality relationships.
Logical Architecture:
graph TD
A[Input Sources] --> B[Modality Gateways]
B --> C[Text Preprocessor]
B --> D[Image Preprocessor]
B --> E[Audio Preprocessor]
C --> F[Rule Engine]
D --> F
E --> F
F --> G[Fused Output]
style F fill:#f9f,stroke:#333
Cloud Implementations:
Provider | Components | Special Features |
---|---|---|
Azure | Logic Apps + Cognitive Services | Built-in content moderator |
AWS | Step Functions + Comprehend/Rekognition | AWS Ground Truth integration |
GCP | Workflows + Vision/NL API | BigQuery ML analytics |
Open Source | Airflow + spaCy/OpenCV | Prometheus monitoring |
3.2 Level 3 (Advanced) - Neural Fusion
Description: Joint embedding space with learned fusion mechanisms. Uses transformer-based architectures to dynamically weight modality contributions. Supports real-time processing and can handle complex cross-modal relationships through attention mechanisms.
Logical Architecture:
graph TD
A[Raw Inputs] --> B[Shared Feature Store]
B --> C[Text Encoder]
B --> D[Image Encoder]
B --> E[Audio Encoder]
C --> F[Cross-Attention Layer]
D --> F
E --> F
F --> G[Unified Predictor]
style F fill:#9f9,stroke:#333
Cloud Implementations:
Provider | Components | Special Features |
---|---|---|
Azure | Azure ML + ONNX Runtime | Confidential computing |
AWS | SageMaker + Inferentia | Neptune graph integration |
GCP | Vertex AI + TPUs | Vertex Feature Store |
Open Source | Ray + HuggingFace | Weaviate vector search |
3.3 Level 4 (Autonomous) - Self-Optimizing
Description: Self-improving systems with continuous learning capabilities. Incorporates reinforcement learning to adapt fusion strategies based on environmental feedback. Can discover novel cross-modal relationships and optimize its own architecture.
Logical Architecture:
graph TD
A[Environment Sensors] --> B[World Model]
B --> C[Modality Routers]
C --> D[Reinforcement Learner]
D --> E[Action Generator]
E --> F[Feedback Loop]
F --> A
style B fill:#99f,stroke:#333
Cloud Implementations:
Provider | Components | Special Features |
---|---|---|
Azure | OpenAI Service + Confidential Computing | Digital twin integration |
AWS | Bedrock + RoboMaker | SageMaker RL toolkit |
GCP | PaLM API + Vertex Explainable AI | Continuous evaluation pipelines |
Open Source | LLaMA-2 + LangChain | AutoGPT-style loops |
4. Cross-Cutting Concerns
4.1 Security Framework
graph LR
A[Data] --> B[Encryption at Rest]
A --> C[Encryption in Transit]
D[Compute] --> E[Confidential Computing]
D --> F[Hardware Attestation]
4.2 Monitoring Matrix
Layer | Metrics | Tools |
---|---|---|
Ingestion | Modality latency | Prometheus |
Fusion | Attention weights | TensorBoard |
Serving | Prediction drift | Evidently |
5. Implementation Guides
5.1 Azure Deployment Blueprint
graph TD
A[Azure Storage] --> B[Modality Processors]
B --> C[Azure ML Pipeline]
C --> D[ONNX Conversion]
D --> E[AKS Deployment]
E --> F[Azure Monitor]
5.2 AWS Reference Pattern
graph TD
A[S3] --> B[Lambda Preprocessors]
B --> C[SageMaker Training]
C --> D[Neptune Graph]
D --> E[EC2 Inference]
6. Glossary
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Modality Gap | The representational disparity between different input types |
Fusion Horizon | Temporal window for cross-modal alignment |
Neural Binding | Learned associations between modality features |
7. Appendices
7.1 Example Implementations
7.2 Regulatory Checklists
- GDPR Article 22 Compliance
- CCPA Automated Decision Opt-out