All Patterns USP's - sonuprajapati15/Authentication-Authorization GitHub Wiki
Comparison of Authentication & Authorization Models
This guide covers Token-Based Authentication, Session-Based Authentication, OAuth 2.0, SAML, MFA, RBAC, ABAC, and the Zero Trust Model with their pros, cons, limitations, and real-life examples.
1. Token-Based Authentication
What it is:
A stateless authentication method where users receive a token (JWT, OAuth) upon login, which they send with every API request.
Pros:
β
Scalable & Stateless β No need to store session data on the server.
β
Works Across Multiple Services β Suitable for microservices & cloud.
β
Fast Authentication β Once a token is issued, no database lookups needed.
Cons & Limitations:
β Token Revocation is Hard β If a token is stolen, it remains valid until expiration.
β Tokens Can Be Hijacked β Must use secure storage (HTTP-only cookies, encryption).
β Short-Lived Access β Requires refresh tokens for long sessions.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Netflix, Spotify, and Twitter APIs β Uses JWT for API authentication.
πΉ GitHub API β Uses OAuth tokens instead of passwords for API requests.
2. Session-Based Authentication
What it is:
Traditional authentication method where a server stores session data and a session ID is sent via a secure cookie.
Pros:
β
More Secure Than Tokens β Sessions can be revoked immediately.
β
Simpler to Implement β Works well in monolithic web apps.
β
No Need for Token Storage β Everything is managed server-side.
Cons & Limitations:
β Not Scalable β Requires session storage (Redis, database).
β High Server Load β Every request requires a session lookup.
β CSRF Vulnerabilities β Must use CSRF protection techniques.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Banking & E-commerce Websites β Stores session in Redis or MySQL.
πΉ Facebook Before OAuth β Used session-based authentication for web logins.
3. OAuth 2.0 Authentication
What it is:
A token-based authorization framework that allows third-party apps to access user data without sharing credentials.
Pros:
β
Ideal for API Security β Users delegate access to apps.
β
Supports SSO & Mobile β Works across different platforms.
β
Secure via Access & Refresh Tokens β Uses short-lived tokens with refresh capability.
Cons & Limitations:
β Complex Implementation β Requires OAuth provider (Google, Facebook, etc.).
β Scope Limitations β Users must manually approve permissions for apps.
β Token Storage Security β Improper storage can lead to leaks.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Google OAuth Login β "Login with Google" for third-party apps.
πΉ Spotify API β Allows third-party apps to access your music library via OAuth.
4. SAML Authentication
What it is:
Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) is an SSO authentication standard used for enterprise identity management.
Pros:
β
Enterprise-Grade Security β Uses signed & encrypted assertions.
β
Best for SSO in Large Organizations β Allows a single login for multiple systems.
β
Works Across Multiple Domains β Unlike OAuth, SAML works without APIs.
Cons & Limitations:
β Not Ideal for APIs β Uses XML, which is slower than JSON-based tokens.
β Complex Setup β Requires Identity Provider (IdP) & Service Provider (SP).
β Not Mobile-Friendly β Designed for web apps, not native mobile apps.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Google Workspace (G Suite) SSO β Uses SAML for enterprise authentication.
πΉ AWS Identity Federation β Uses SAML for cloud access control.
5. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
What it is:
An authentication method requiring two or more factors (password + OTP, fingerprint, security key).
Pros:
β
Increases Security β Prevents password-only breaches.
β
Flexible Authentication Methods β OTP, TOTP, SMS, Email, Biometric.
β
Mandatory for Compliance β Required for GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS.
Cons & Limitations:
β User Experience Impact β Adds extra login steps.
β SMS-Based MFA is Weak β Susceptible to SIM-swapping attacks.
β Hardware-Based MFA Can Be Costly β Security keys require hardware purchase.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Google Authenticator, Authy β TOTP-based MFA apps.
πΉ Apple ID, Microsoft Account MFA β Enforces MFA on sensitive accounts.
6. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
What it is:
Users are assigned roles (Admin, Editor, Viewer), and roles define permissions.
Pros:
β
Easy to Implement & Manage β Fixed roles simplify user access management.
β
Enforces Least Privilege β Users get only the access they need.
β
Works Well for Organizations β Ideal for hierarchical access control.
Cons & Limitations:
β Not Flexible β Users canβt have conditional access based on attributes.
β Role Explosion Problem β Too many roles can lead to complexity.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ AWS IAM Roles β Manages cloud permissions using RBAC.
πΉ Enterprise HR & IT Systems β Assigns roles to employees.
7. Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)
What it is:
Access is controlled based on attributes (location, time, department, risk level) rather than just roles.
Pros:
β
More Flexible Than RBAC β Can enforce dynamic policies.
β
Granular Access Control β Allows context-aware security.
β
Best for Regulatory Compliance β Used in GDPR & HIPAA security models.
Cons & Limitations:
β Complex Policy Management β Requires attribute-based rules.
β Performance Issues β Policy evaluation is slower than RBAC.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Google Drive Sharing β Users can share files based on user attributes.
πΉ Healthcare Systems β Doctors can only access patient records in their department.
8. Zero Trust Security Model
What it is:
Assumes no entity is trusted by default, and every access request is continuously verified.
Pros:
β
Best Security Model β Prevents insider threats & lateral movement attacks.
β
Continuous Authentication β Uses behavior analytics.
β
Micro-Segmentation β Restricts access to only whatβs necessary.
Cons & Limitations:
β Complex & Costly β Requires advanced security infrastructure.
β High Performance Overhead β Every request must be authenticated.
Real-Life Example:
πΉ Google BeyondCorp β Implements Zero Trust for corporate access.
πΉ US Department of Defense (DoD) β Uses Zero Trust for cyber defense.
Final Thoughts
Each security model has strengths and trade-offs. The best approach is often a combination:
πΉ OAuth + MFA for API security
πΉ RBAC + ABAC for enterprise access control
πΉ Zero Trust for high-security organizations