Identity - secuguru/security-terms GitHub Wiki
Identity management is critical to securing access to resources in any organization. It defines who can access what and under which conditions, ensuring that only authorized users and services interact with sensitive data. Key concepts include Access Control Lists (ACLs), service accounts vs. user accounts, impersonation, and federated identity.
1. Access Control Lists (ACLs)
- Definition: An ACL is a set of rules that defines which authenticated users or services have permission to access specific resources and what actions they can perform.
- Purpose: ACLs are used to enforce access control policies, allowing organizations to restrict access based on user identity and predefined permissions.
- How It Works:
- Each entry in an ACL specifies a subject (user, group, or service) and their permitted actions (read, write, execute, etc.) on a resource.
- ACLs can be implemented at various levels, such as file systems, databases, and network resources.
- Example: A file system ACL may allow a user to read a file but deny write access, ensuring data integrity by limiting modification rights to specific users.
2. Service Accounts vs. User Accounts
- User Accounts:
- Definition: User accounts are created for individuals who need access to systems, applications, or resources for their job functions.
- Privileges: User accounts are typically assigned privileges based on the user’s role and are subject to regular review and adjustments.
- Authentication: User accounts use personal credentials for access, often combined with multi-factor authentication.
- Service Accounts:
- Definition: Service accounts, also known as robot accounts, are non-human accounts created to support automation and application-to-application communication.
- Purpose: Used by applications, scripts, or automation processes to access resources without human intervention.
- Privileges: Service accounts should be restricted to the minimum permissions required for their tasks, as these accounts can be highly targeted by attackers.
- Security Implications:
- Privileges: Over-permissioned service accounts are a common security risk, especially in cloud environments.
- Attack Vector: Attackers may target service accounts to gain access to resources or escalate privileges, making it critical to enforce the principle of least privilege.
- Example: A service account used by a backup service might need read access to databases and storage but shouldn’t have administrative privileges.
3. Impersonation
- Definition: Impersonation is when an entity (user or service) assumes the identity and privileges of another entity. In cloud environments, this often involves obtaining tokens or keys to act on behalf of a legitimate account.
- How It Works:
- Exported Account Keys: Attackers may acquire access keys or credentials associated with an account, allowing them to operate with the same privileges.
- ActAs and Impersonation Tokens:
- Some cloud providers allow specific roles or services to “ActAs” another user or service, temporarily assuming their identity to perform specific actions.
- This is commonly done using tokens, such as JWT (JSON Web Tokens), which include identity claims and can be used to authenticate and authorize actions on behalf of another identity.
- Security Implications:
- Token Compromise: If JWTs or other tokens are stolen, attackers can perform actions as the impersonated identity.
- Privilege Escalation: Improper use or configuration of ActAs permissions can allow attackers to gain higher privileges by impersonating more privileged accounts.
4. Federated Identity
- Definition: Federated identity allows users to authenticate with multiple systems or organizations using a single identity from an external identity provider (IdP), rather than creating separate accounts for each system.
- How It Works:
- Single Sign-On (SSO): Federated identity is often implemented as part of SSO systems, where users authenticate with a central IdP, and the IdP vouches for their identity across different applications and services.
- Identity Providers: Examples include Google, Microsoft, Okta, and other services that allow users to log in with their corporate or personal credentials across multiple applications.
- Security Protocols: Federated identity commonly uses protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) and OAuth to enable secure identity federation across organizations.
- Benefits:
- Reduced Complexity: Users can access multiple applications with one identity, reducing password fatigue.
- Improved Security: Centralized authentication with the IdP simplifies account management and enables consistent security policies.
- Security Considerations:
- Trust in the IdP: Organizations must trust the security of the IdP since a compromise at the IdP level affects all federated services.
- Access Control Consistency: Proper configuration of permissions across federated systems is essential to prevent over-permissioned access.
Comparison Table
Aspect | User Accounts | Service Accounts | Federated Identity |
---|---|---|---|
Purpose | Individual access | Automation, service-to-service access | Cross-application identity sharing |
Privileges | Role-based | Minimal, task-specific | Defined by federated systems |
Security Requirements | MFA, role-based permissions | Limited privileges, monitoring | Trust in IdP, access control alignment |
Common Security Concerns | Account compromise, password reuse | Privilege escalation, token misuse | IdP compromise, misconfigured access |
Summary
- ACLs: Define permissions for users or services on resources, controlling access based on identity.
- Service Accounts vs. User Accounts: Service accounts facilitate automation and should have limited permissions, while user accounts are for individuals with role-based privileges.
- Impersonation: Allows entities to act on behalf of others, often using tokens or keys; it can be abused by attackers if tokens or impersonation permissions are improperly secured.
- Federated Identity: Enables users to access multiple systems with a single set of credentials via an external IdP, improving usability but requiring robust trust and access control.
Each of these identity management mechanisms plays a unique role in access control and security. Understanding their differences and best practices helps organizations protect resources by controlling access, reducing over-permissioned accounts, and ensuring secure authentication across services and platforms.