Hadoop Benchmark - seaweedfs/seaweedfs GitHub Wiki
Here are my steps. First, checkout hadoop 2.10.0 binary, untar, and cd in to the hadoop directory.
wget http://apache.mirrors.hoobly.com/hadoop/common/hadoop-2.10.0/hadoop-2.10.0.tar.gz
tar xvf hadoop-2.10.0.tar.gz
cd hadoop-2.10.0
Modify the file ./etc/hadoop/core-site.xml
<configuration>
<property>
<name>fs.seaweedfs.impl</name>
<value>seaweed.hdfs.SeaweedFileSystem</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>fs.defaultFS</name>
<value>seaweedfs://localhost:8888</value>
</property>
</configuration>
Then get the seaweedfs hadoop client jar.
cd share/hadoop/common/lib/
wget https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/repositories/releases/content/com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs-hadoop3-client/4.00/seaweedfs-hadoop3-client-4.00.jar
The TestDFSIO benchmark is used for measuring I/O (read/write) performance.
However, the generated data to write is all zero. SeaweedFS automatically compress this kind of data. So this is not scientific for now.
Start the TestDFSIO write tests:
bin/hadoop jar ./share/hadoop/mapreduce/hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.10.0-tests.jar TestDFSIO -write -nrFiles 8 -size 32GB -bufferSize 8388608 -resFile /tmp/TestDFSIOwrite.txt
...
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Sat Jul 25 16:48:21 PDT 2020
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 8
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 262144
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 399.16
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 399.34
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 8.56
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 659.45
20/07/25 16:48:21 INFO fs.TestDFSIO:
Start the TestDFSIO read tests:
bin/hadoop jar ./share/hadoop/mapreduce/hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-2.10.0-tests.jar TestDFSIO -read -nrFiles 8 -size 32GB -bufferSize 8388608 -resFile /tmp/TestDFSIOwrite.txt
...
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: ----- TestDFSIO ----- : read
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Date & time: Fri Jul 17 15:59:38 PDT 2020
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Number of files: 8
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Total MBytes processed: 8192
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Throughput mb/sec: 393.26
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Average IO rate mb/sec: 393.72
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: IO rate std deviation: 13.33
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO: Test exec time sec: 22.76
20/07/17 15:59:38 INFO fs.TestDFSIO:
To test the performance of HDFS and SeaweedFS, we did a comparison by running 4 common spark operators, such as count, group by, join and write, for group by and join , there is a count followed to act.
The basic configuration information of cluster is as follows:
-
HDFS:
- Node number: 25
- Total disks: 36disk * 25node = 900disk
- Disk capacity: 3.7T SATA
- Total disk capacity: 3.19PB
- Replication: 5
-
SeaweedFS:
- Node number: 6(3+3 rack)
- Disk capacity: 3.7T SATA
- Cluster max volume: 21500
- Total disk capacity: 799TB
- Replication policy: 010
Here are the details and results of our test. At the beginning of the test, we put our data to both HDFS and SeaweedFS. The amount of the data is 100 million records, and stored in 200 parquet files. The size of each parquet file is about 89 MB. We ran spark on yarn with 20 executors. In spark, we got two DataFrames by reading parquet from HDFS and HCFS separately, then executed count, group by and join by 100 times , and write by 10 times, on each DataFrame.
As for count, SeaweedFS's advantage is obvious. The average time of the DataFrame from HDFS is 4.05 seconds, while SeaweedFS is only 0.659. Following is the result:
| Summary | HDFS | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 100 | 100 |
| Mean | 4.050 | 0.659 |
| Stddev | 0.264 | 0.941 |
| Min | 3.678 | 0.392 |
| Max | 5.692 | 9.688 |
As for write, we wrote the DataFrame from HDFS to SeaweedFS, and wrote the DataFrame from HCFS to SeaweedFS. Following is the result:
| Summary | HDFS | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 10 | 10 |
| Mean | 234.279 | 232.078 |
| Stddev | 26.823 | 12.652 |
| Min | 216.931 | 214.349 |
| Max | 307.330 | 252.375 |
As for group by, following is the result:
| Summary | HDFS | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 100 | 100 |
| Mean | 14.121 | 12.515 |
| Stddev | 1.972 | 1.255 |
| Min | 12.879 | 11.322 |
| Max | 32.296 | 22.573 |
As for join, every DataFrame join with itself on one column. Following is the result:
| Summary | HDFS | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 100 | 100 |
| Mean | 25.684 | 23.897 |
| Stddev | 0.934 | 1.381 |
| Min | 24.006 | 22.275 |
| Max | 30.991 | 30.279 |