Discussion Summary: QA Lead (Neha) November 2024 - sanjaygupta-professional/test2 GitHub Wiki
Key Insights
Team Structure & Evolution
-
Current Organization
- 12-13 QA team members across multiple locations
- Primarily India-based (Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, Chennai)
- Operating as separate QA team, not integrated into pods
- Team growth from 3 to 13 members over past year
-
Team Transition
- Initially focused on backend/API testing
- Recently expanded scope to include frontend testing
- Team members being cross-trained across areas
- No dedicated QA resources in Philippines
Current Working Model
-
Daily Operations
- Team joins 9:30 AM daily standup
- 10:00 AM QA team sync
- 11:00 AM functional clarification call
- Multiple test execution windows
- Late evening coordination for US teams
-
Process Flow
- Stage environment testing
- UAT environment validation
- Production readiness testing
- Release sign-off process
- Recent addition of PM UAT process
Key Challenges
-
Sprint Execution
- Late delivery of stories for testing
- Compressed testing windows
- Bulk of testing in last few days
- Limited time for regression
- Multiple parallel activities
-
Release Management
- Overlapping release testing (1.3.2 UAT with 1.4 Sprint)
- Resource allocation challenges
- Environment stability issues
- Complex release sign-off process
-
Process Issues
- Multiple sign-offs required
- Duplicate validation efforts
- Limited automation coverage
- Tool transition challenges (Cypress to Selenium/Katalon)
Quality Practices
-
Testing Approach
- Manual testing primary mode
- API testing via Postman collections
- Limited automation framework
- Environment-specific testing
- Regression suite maintenance
-
Documentation
- Test cases in Azure DevOps
- Evidence capture process
- Defect tracking system
- Release sign-off documentation
Improvement Opportunities
-
Process Optimization
- Earlier testing involvement
- Better sprint distribution
- Reduced duplication
- Streamlined sign-offs
-
Team Structure
- Potential pod integration
- Cross-functional teams
- Better resource allocation
- Skill development
-
Automation
- Framework selection
- Coverage increase
- Tool standardization
- CI/CD integration
Pain Points
-
Resource Management
- Multiple parallel activities
- Late sprint compression
- Release overlap
- Limited bandwidth
-
Process Inefficiencies
- Multiple review layers
- Duplicate testing
- Complex sign-off
- Limited advance planning
-
Technical Challenges
- Tool transition
- Limited automation
- Environment issues
- Integration complexity
Recommendations
Immediate Actions
-
Process Improvements
- Optimize sprint testing flow
- Streamline sign-off process
- Better planning integration
- Earlier involvement
-
Team Structure
- Evaluate pod integration
- Define clear roles
- Optimize resource allocation
- Build cross-functional capabilities
-
Technical Enhancement
- Finalize automation approach
- Increase test coverage
- Improve tool usage
- Enhance documentation
Short Term Goals
-
Quality Framework
- Define quality metrics
- Establish dashboards
- Implement tracking
- Regular reporting
-
Team Capability
- Cross-training
- Tool expertise
- Domain knowledge
- Process understanding
-
Process Maturity
- Standard practices
- Clear guidelines
- Efficient workflows
- Better coordination
Support Needs
-
Process Definition
- Clear guidelines
- Templates
- Best practices
- Standard procedures
-
Tool Support
- Automation framework
- Tool configuration
- Integration support
- Training needs
-
Team Development
- Skill enhancement
- Role clarity
- Collaboration practices
- Knowledge sharing
Next Steps
Immediate (0-30 days)
- Document current processes
- Identify quick wins
- Plan automation approach
- Define quality metrics
Short Term (30-90 days)
- Implement new processes
- Start automation
- Enhance reporting
- Build capabilities
Follow-up Actions
- Share process documentation
- Plan team organization
- Define metrics framework
- Schedule regular reviews
- Track improvement progress
Success Factors
-
Clear Process
- Standard guidelines
- Efficient workflows
- Regular reviews
- Measurable outcomes
-
Team Enablement
- Right skills
- Clear roles
- Proper tools
- Adequate support
-
Stakeholder Support
- Leadership buy-in
- Resource allocation
- Tool investment
- Process adherence