Human Framework - rollthecloudinc/hedge GitHub Wiki

LLM-Powered Architecture: A Dynamic, Scalable Knowledge Framework

HUMAN is a LLM-powered architecture is designed to emulate human-like problem-solving, process complex conversations, and deliver advanced insights through semantic search, clustering, analysis, and recommendations. By combining Large Language Models (LLMs) (e.g., GPT-4) with external tools like OpenSearch, the system creates a robust framework for managing, reasoning through, and refining knowledge workflows in real time.

Core Objectives

  1. Break Down Complexity: Decompose complex problems into manageable subtasks.

  2. Real-Time Data Processing: Process and store conversation data for dynamic semantic search and analysis.

  3. Insight Generation: Aggregate and summarize conversations for higher-level insights.

  4. Advanced Analysis: Enable semantic search, clustering, and trend analysis across knowledge domains.

  5. Adaptive Workflows: Iteratively refine outputs and dynamically adjust workflows based on errors or new insights.

System Architecture

Key Components

  1. LLM Neurons:

    • Specialized LLM models (e.g., GPT-4) configured for specific subtasks:

      • Reasoning Neuron: Breaks down tasks and generates logical outputs.

      • Test Generation Neuron: Creates validation tests for workflows.

      • Solution Synthesizer: Aggregates and refines outputs into coherent deliverables.

  2. Orchestration Layer:

    • Serves as the system's "brain," dynamically managing workflows:

      • Task Router: Routes tasks to relevant neurons or external tools.

      • Feedback Evaluator: Validates outputs and triggers refinement loops.

      • Dynamic Planner: Adjusts workflows based on errors or new data.

      • Solution Synthesizer: Combines task outputs into a unified final result.

  3. Non-LLM Tools:

    • External tools integrated for action-oriented tasks:

      • Code Execution Environments: Test and validate code in sandboxes.

      • Headless Browsers: Automate web interactions and API calls.

      • OpenSearch: Enables vector-based semantic search, clustering, and trend analysis.

  4. Feedback Loop:

    • Provides iterative refinement of subtasks using a combination of automated rules, LLM reasoning, and external tools.

  5. OpenSearch Integration:

    • Stores embeddings, metadata, and summaries for messages, conversations, and clusters.

    • Facilitates fast, vector-based semantic search and advanced analysis.

Dynamic Knowledge Representation

Neurons: Specialized Units of Knowledge

  • Explanation: Neurons represent localized units of knowledge, focusing on specific domains or subdomains. Each neuron operates independently, storing and refining its knowledge base while dynamically collaborating with others.

Details:

  1. Localized Knowledge:

    • Each neuron manages its own data, including raw text, embeddings, and summaries.

    • Neurons specialize in narrow domains (e.g., "European Rivers" or "Shipping Issues").

    • Example: A "European Rivers" neuron maintains knowledge about major rivers, their economic impact, and geographic details.

  2. Embeddings and Semantic Search:

    • Neurons store high-dimensional embeddings of their data for semantic similarity searches.

    • Example: A query like "What is the longest river in Europe?" triggers the "European Rivers" neuron to retrieve relevant embeddings and answers.

  3. Summarization:

    • Neurons generate summaries of their localized knowledge using lightweight LLMs.

    • Example: A "France" neuron might summarize its knowledge as: "France is known for its capital Paris, historical landmarks, and cultural significance."

  4. Continuous Learning:

    • Neurons dynamically refine their embeddings and knowledge based on new data and query patterns.

    • Example

Continuous Learning (Continued):

  • Example: A "Shipping Issues" neuron updates its knowledge base when new customer complaints about delivery delays are added, ensuring its responses remain relevant and up-to-date.

Architectural Considerations:

  • Modularity: Neurons operate independently and are designed to adapt to new data or contexts.

  • Storage: Embeddings and summaries are stored in vector databases, enabling fast semantic search.

  • Lightweight LLMs: Each neuron uses embedded LLMs for processing and refining its localized knowledge.

Dynamic Communication

Explanation:

In this architecture, communication between neurons is driven by bond strength, which reflects semantic relevance, contextual similarity, and collaboration frequency. Instead of relying on rigid parent-child hierarchies, neurons dynamically collaborate to process queries and generate responses.

Details:

  1. Impulse Routing:

    • Queries (referred to as "impulses") are routed to neurons with the strongest contextual bonds to the query.

    • Bond strength is determined by semantic similarity, past collaboration, and query frequency.

    • Example: A query about "European trade routes" activates collaboration between the "European Rivers," "European Geography," and "European Economy" neurons.

  2. Dynamic Collaboration:

    • Neurons form temporary networks to address specific queries or tasks.

    • Example: For a query about "The economic impact of the Rhine River," the "European Rivers" neuron collaborates with the "European Economy" neuron to provide a combined geographic and economic perspective.

  3. Response Aggregation:

    • Each neuron contributes partial outputs (e.g., embeddings, summaries, or raw data) to the overall query response, which is aggregated into a unified answer.

    • Example: The "European Geography" neuron provides information about the Rhine River's location, while the "European Economy" neuron explains its role in trade.

  4. Human Interaction Interface:

    • Users can interact directly with specific neurons or submit general queries that dynamically route through relevant neurons.

    • Example: A user can directly query the "France" neuron for cultural information or ask a general question, such as "What are notable European landmarks?" to activate multiple neurons.

Architectural Considerations:

  • Orchestration Layer: Manages query routing by calculating bond strengths and ensuring efficient collaboration.

  • Aggregation Layer: Combines partial results from neurons using summarization models and embedding techniques.

Dynamic Relationships

Explanation:

Relationships between neurons are defined by bond strength, which reflects contextual relevance, semantic similarity, and collaboration frequency. Relationships emerge dynamically based on the needs of specific queries or tasks, forming temporary hierarchies when necessary.

Details:

  1. Bond Strength:

    • Bonds act as weighted connections representing the strength of collaboration between neurons.

    • Stronger bonds emerge between neurons that frequently work together or share overlapping domains.

    • Example: The "European Geography" neuron has a strong bond with the "European Economy" neuron because trade-related queries often require both geographic and economic insights.

  2. Dynamic Relationship Formation:

    • Neurons establish or strengthen bonds based on query patterns, data overlaps, and feedback loops.

    • Example: If the "Shipping Issues" neuron frequently collaborates with the "Customs and Tariffs" neuron for trade-related queries, their bond strength increases.

  3. Implied Hierarchies:

    • Relationships naturally form soft hierarchies during query resolution, based on contextual relevance.

    • Example: For a query about "Rivers used for trade in Europe," the "European Rivers" neuron may temporarily act as the central neuron, delegating tasks to "European Geography" and "European Economy."

  4. Weak Bonds and Pruning:

    • Bonds that are rarely used or become irrelevant are

Weak Bonds and Pruning (Continued):

  • Bonds that are rarely used or become irrelevant are gradually weakened and eventually pruned to optimize system efficiency.

  • Example: If the "European History" neuron rarely collaborates with the "Shipping Issues" neuron, their bond weakens over time and may eventually be removed.

  1. Cross-Domain Binding:

    • Neurons can form connections across different domains, enabling interdisciplinary insights.

    • Example: The "European Rivers" neuron may form a bond with the "Climate Impact" neuron to address queries about environmental effects on trade routes.

Architectural Considerations:

  • Graph-Based Structure: Relationships between neurons are represented as weighted edges in a graph, allowing efficient traversal and updates.

  • Decentralized Relationship Management: Neurons independently monitor collaboration patterns and adjust bond strengths in real time.

Reorganization: Optimizing the Network

Explanation:

Reorganization ensures the system remains efficient, scalable, and contextually relevant by dynamically adapting the network of neurons. This includes splitting, merging, strengthening, or weakening bonds to reflect evolving data, query patterns, and user needs.

Details:

  1. Dynamic Splitting:

    • A neuron splits into specialized sub-neurons when its scope becomes too broad or diverse.

    • Trigger: High query volume or frequent delegation indicating diverse subdomains.

    • Example: The "European Geography" neuron splits into "Western Europe" and "Eastern Europe" neurons as queries become more region-specific.

  2. Dynamic Merging:

    • Two or more neurons merge when their knowledge domains overlap significantly or when their individual activity levels drop.

    • Trigger: Low activity or frequent redundant collaboration.

    • Example: The "Positive Feedback" and "Negative Feedback" neurons merge into a single "Feedback" neuron to simplify processing.

  3. Bond Rebalancing:

    • Bond strengths are dynamically updated to reflect current query patterns and collaboration needs.

    • Trigger: Frequent collaboration between neurons or shifting focus in user queries.

    • Example: If queries about "European trade routes" increase, bonds between the "European Rivers" and "European Economy" neurons are strengthened.

  4. Neuron Shrinking:

    • A neuron deactivates and transfers its knowledge to related neurons when its scope becomes redundant or underutilized.

    • Trigger: Prolonged inactivity or redundancy.

    • Example: The "Domestic Shipping" neuron transfers its knowledge to the more general "Shipping Issues" neuron and deactivates.

  5. Context-Aware Optimization:

    • The system monitors query trends and reorganizes neurons and bonds to optimize response time and relevance.

    • Trigger: Emerging trends or shifts in query focus.

    • Example: If "Climate Change" queries frequently involve "European Rivers," bonds between the "Climate Impact" and "European Geography" neurons are strengthened, and related neurons may reorganize.

  6. Neuron Creation:

    • New neurons are dynamically created to address emerging topics or underrepresented knowledge areas.

    • Trigger: Repeated queries in unexplored domains.

    • Example: If users frequently query about "AI Ethics," the system creates a dedicated "AI Ethics" neuron to handle such queries.

  7. Feedback-Driven Optimization:

    • User feedback and query resolution success rates influence bond strengths and neuron organization.

    • Trigger: Positive feedback strengthens bonds, while unresolved queries prompt system adjustments.

    • Example: If the collaboration between the "European Rivers" and "European Economy" neurons consistently produces accurate responses, their bond is further reinforced.

  8. Cross-Domain Reorganization:

    • Interdisciplinary neurons are reorganized to facilitate collaboration across domains.

    • Example: The "European Geography" neuron strengthens its bond with the "Climate Impact" neuron to

Cross-Domain Reorganization (Continued):

  • Example: The "European Geography" neuron strengthens its bond with the "Climate Impact" neuron to address environmental concerns related to rivers and trade routes. This ensures faster collaboration for queries requiring knowledge from both domains.

  1. Efficiency Pruning:

    • Neurons and bonds that are underutilized or redundant are deactivated or removed to maintain system efficiency.

    • Trigger: Prolonged inactivity or lack of relevance to evolving user needs.

    • Example: The "Historical Trade Routes" neuron may be pruned if queries about ancient trading patterns decline significantly.

Architectural Considerations for Reorganization:

  • Graph-Based Management: Relationships and bonds are stored in a graph structure for efficient traversal, updates, and dynamic optimization.

  • Real-Time Monitoring: The system continuously tracks collaboration patterns, query trends, and user feedback to guide neuron reorganization.

  • Decentralized Control: Reorganization decisions are made independently by neurons, ensuring flexibility while maintaining overall system coherence.

Memory Retention: Enabling Long-Term Knowledge Persistence

Explanation:
Memory retention ensures the system can simulate continuity across conversations, enabling it to store, retrieve, and refine knowledge over time. By implementing mechanisms for both short-term and long-term memory, the system dynamically adapts to user needs, retains historical context, and provides proactive insights based on prior interactions. This creates an evolving knowledge base tailored to the user’s requirements.

Key Components:

  1. Memory Storage:

    • Short-Term Memory:
      Stores active conversation context for immediate query resolution and iterative refinement.

      • Example: During a session, the assistant remembers the user’s preferences for task prioritization or current projects.

    • Long-Term Memory:
      Archives key facts, summaries, and unresolved tasks for future use.

      • Example: The system stores past discussions about learning Python or planning a trip to Japan for cross-session continuity.

  2. Memory Aggregation and Summarization:

    • After each conversation, the system summarizes key takeaways:

      • User preferences (e.g., "Prefers morning workouts").

      • Tasks and goals (e.g., "Track Python learning progress").

      • Unresolved questions (e.g., "Find cheap flights to Japan").

    • Summaries are stored alongside metadata (e.g., timestamps, topics) to enable efficient retrieval.

  3. Contextual Retrieval:

    • Dynamically retrieves relevant memory entries based on query context and semantic similarity.

      • Keyword Search: Finds entries matching specific terms (e.g., “Python” or “Japan”).

      • Semantic Search: Uses embeddings to identify contextually similar memories across sessions.

      • Example: A query like “Help me plan my coding schedule” retrieves summaries about the user’s Python learning goals.

  4. Memory Consolidation:

    • Periodically reviews and merges related memory entries to reduce redundancy and ensure relevance.

      • Example: Combines multiple conversations about “Travel planning” into a single summary:

        • "User plans to visit Kyoto and Tokyo in December with a $2000 budget."

  5. Task Tracking and Proactive Suggestions:

    • Tracks pending tasks or unresolved queries across sessions.

      • Example: "Remind me to check cheap flights to Japan next week" is stored and proactively surfaced when relevant.

    • Proactively suggests actions based on past interactions.

      • Example: "Last month, you discussed learning Python for data science. Would you like resources or follow-ups?"

Architectural Considerations:

  1. Storage Mechanisms:

    • Relational or NoSQL Databases (e.g., SQLite, Azure Cosmos DB):
      Stores structured summaries and task metadata for efficient retrieval.

    • Vector Databases (e.g., Pinecone, Azure Cognitive Search):
      Stores semantic embeddings for advanced similarity search.

  2. Memory Retrieval:

    • Combines keyword-based and semantic search techniques to identify relevant context dynamically.

    • Uses embeddings generated by OpenAI’s

      text-embedding-ada-002

      for semantic similarity comparisons.

  3. Efficiency Optimization:

    • Summarizes memory to reduce token usage when feeding context into the prompt for GPT-4.

    • Implements aging mechanisms to archive or prune outdated information.

  4. Feedback Integration:

    • Incorporates user feedback to refine stored knowledge and correct inaccuracies.

    • Example: Updating preferences when a user specifies, “I prefer working out in the evenings.”

Summary of the System

This LLM-powered architecture is a dynamic, scalable framework designed to manage knowledge, solve complex tasks, and generate actionable insights. By combining specialized LLMs with external tools like OpenSearch, the system adapts to user needs in real time while continuously refining its internal structure.

Key Features:

  1. Knowledge Representation:

    • Neurons independently manage localized knowledge using embeddings and summaries.

    • Continuous learning ensures neurons dynamically refine their knowledge based on new data and evolving query patterns.

  2. Communication:

    • Queries are routed based on bond strength, enabling efficient collaboration between neurons.

    • Responses are aggregated into unified answers by leveraging semantic relationships between neurons.

  3. Dynamic Relationships:

    • Bonds between neurons are dynamically updated to reflect relevance, collaboration frequency, and semantic similarity.

    • Interdisciplinary connections enable cross-domain insights and adaptability.

  4. Reorganization:

    • Neurons dynamically split, merge, or reorganize based on query patterns, activity levels, and emerging trends.

    • Feedback-driven optimization ensures the system remains efficient and contextually relevant.

Advanced Use Cases:

  1. Semantic Search:

    • Retrieve messages, conversations, or neuron clusters based on semantic similarity for quick and accurate insights.

  2. Recommendations:

    • Suggest solutions, related conversations, or knowledge clusters based on embeddings and query contexts.

  3. Cross-Domain Queries:

    • Dynamically form neuron networks to address interdisciplinary questions (e.g., environmental impacts of trade routes).

  4. Trend Analysis:

    • Monitor evolving topics, sentiment trends, and emerging patterns over time for actionable insights.

  5. Continuous Learning:

    • Neurons refine their embeddings and summaries in real time based on new data, user feedback, and collaboration patterns.

  6. Error Handling and Recovery:

    • Store incomplete workflows and aggregate partial data for recovery or follow-up queries.

Final Notes:

This LLM-powered architecture seamlessly integrates reasoning capabilities, dynamic workflows, and embedding-driven analysis to deliver real-time knowledge management and actionable insights. Its modular and scalable design ensures adaptability across diverse domains, making it an indispensable tool for solving complex problems, uncovering trends, and driving decision-making in both real-time and retrospective contexts.

Conclusion

This LLM-powered architecture represents an innovative framework for managing and processing knowledge at scale. By leveraging specialized neurons, dynamic communication mechanisms, and adaptive reorganization, the system achieves a high degree of flexibility, efficiency, and contextual relevance. Its ability to emulate human-like problem-solving through modular LLMs and external integrations positions it as a powerful solution for tackling complex tasks across domains.

Key Strengths of the HUMAN

  1. Dynamic and Adaptive Workflows:

    • The system adapts its workflows to dynamically handle errors, incomplete tasks, or shifting user needs.

    • Feedback loops and real-time adjustments ensure robust and accurate responses.

  2. Scalability and Modularity:

    • Modular design allows for the seamless addition of new neurons or tools, enabling the system to scale across domains or tasks.

    • Efficient storage and retrieval mechanisms (e.g., OpenSearch) support large datasets and fast processing.

  3. Advanced Analytics:

    • Supports clustering, topic modeling, and trend analysis to uncover actionable insights from conversation data.

    • Tracks sentiment trends and monitors evolving topics for proactive decision-making.

  4. Real-Time and Retrospective Insights:

    • Offers real-time semantic search, recommendations, and summarization during ongoing interactions.

    • Provides retrospective analysis for historical data, enabling long-term insights and reporting.

  5. Error Resilience:

    • Handles incomplete workflows by storing partial data and linking it to related neurons or contexts for recovery.

    • Ensures knowledge continuity even in scenarios where queries are interrupted or fail.

  6. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

    • Facilitates collaboration across domains through cross-neuron binding and dynamic relationship formation.

    • Enables seamless integration of diverse knowledge areas for complex, multi-faceted queries.

Applications Across Domains

This architecture is applicable in a wide range of scenarios, including:

  1. Customer Support:

    • Retrieve similar past queries to recommend solutions in real time.

    • Summarize trends in customer complaints and feedback for actionable insights.

  2. Knowledge Management:

    • Organize and retrieve knowledge through semantic search and clustering.

    • Provide concise summaries for large datasets of conversations.

  3. Research and Development:

    • Identify emerging trends through clustering and topic modeling.

    • Generate cross-domain insights for complex research questions.

  4. Error Recovery:

    • Automatically retry failed subtasks or flag them for human intervention.

    • Aggregate incomplete workflows for further refinement.

  5. Trend Analysis:

    • Track sentiment and topic trends over time to identify recurring patterns or emerging issues.

    • Provide proactive insights for decision-making across industries.

Final Thoughts

This LLM-powered architecture is a groundbreaking solution for organizations looking to enhance their ability to process, organize, and extract knowledge from complex datasets. Its dynamic neuron structure, adaptive workflows, and embedding-driven insights make it highly efficient and versatile. Whether applied to customer support, research, trend analysis, or knowledge management, the system is built to continuously learn and adapt, ensuring relevance and scalability in ever-changing environments.

By combining state-of-the-art LLMs with advanced external tools like OpenSearch, the system bridges the gap between human-like reasoning and computational precision, delivering reliable and actionable insights. Its modular design ensures that it can grow alongside organizational needs, making it a future-proof solution for managing knowledge in the age of AI.