beauty - pannous/warp GitHub Wiki
While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, we believe in a thing such as universal beauty.
ctx.line_to(offset_x, offset_y);
ctx.stroke();
ctx.begin_path();
ctx.move_to(offset_x, offset_y);
can be beautified in Angle as
# not yet: with … do blocks (card with-do-block)
with context do
line to offset.x offset.y
stroke
begin path
move to offset.x offset.y
end
Can anyone really enjoy all those dots and braces and semicolons .();? How could anyone argue that the first code is more beautiful than the second code?
- In the first example it is immediately clear that the receiving object is ctx/
context
Julia
The Julia programming language is a prime example of an expression of good taste and beauty, also in writing and describing their features:
https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/871486/e4ae97b79d72bb25/