WG‐Meeting‐2026‐03 31 - openid/sharedsignals GitHub Wiki

Agenda

Updated tests are here
(Thomas) There are now CAEP Interop Specific Testplans:
OpenID Shared Signals Framework 1.0 Final/CAEP Interop Profile: Transmitter test
OpenID Shared Signals Framework 1.0 Final/CAEP Interop Profile: Receiver test
Once we have two implementations each successfully using the receiver and transmitter tests, we can propose the interop draft for becoming final
(Jen) We need to submit that soon since the process is long
(Jen) Could we get someone to review the updated draft?
(Atul) Provide any feedback in GitHub issues
(Jen) Typos may be proposed as a PR
(Atul) Are there incentives for people to test early?
- (Thomas) Normally we don't give any incentive because implementers are very motivated to test
- (Thomas) I'll check with Joseph nonetheless

(Vatsal) Is the idea that the signal was received and understood? Or is it that it was received and an action was taken
- (Sean) It is both. Just understanding the event can be conveyed with an acknowledgement
(Vatsal) In previous situations we didn't want it to be a part of SSF
- (Sean) That's why it's a separate extension and not a part of the baseline.
(Yair) There is a benefit to this being its own spec, because others don't need to worry about it if they don't care about it.
(Apoorva) How would the specific process for this, because SETs themselves don't talk about acknowledgements, so how are we going to fix that?
(Atul) Can you point to a section in the SET spec? (to be done offline)
(Apoorva) via chat "...SET recipients will often take actions upon receivng SETs....may interepret for their own purposes." (so, no restriction).