2025‐03‐11 - openid/ipsie GitHub Wiki

IPSIE WG Meeting Minutes

Date: 2025-03-11

Attendees

  • Dean H. Saxe (Beyond Identity)
  • Sean Miller (RSA)
  • Kenn Chong (RSA)
  • Jon Bartlett (Zscaler)
  • Matt Topper (UberEther)
  • Bjorn Hjelm (Yubico)
  • Tom Clancy (MITRE)
  • Robin Martherus (Cisco)
  • Dick Hardt (Hellō)
  • Karl McGuinness (Self)
  • Vatsal Gupta (Apple)
  • Filip Skokan (Okta)
  • Victor Lu (Independent)
  • Jen Schreiber (Workday)
  • JD Pawar (Workday)
  • Travis Tripp (HPE)

Agenda

Notetaker: Tom Clancy

Minutes

  • Antitrust policy reminder
  • Slack invite link updated as of last night
  • Call schedule updates - no call for March 18 due to IETF
    • IIW week schedule TBD, likely to cancel or move to a new day to minimize conflict
    • Keep the conversation going during the gap by communicating on Slack
  • Start reviewing SL1 profile for OpenID -- editor's copy
  • Already some discussion on GitHub, Slack, etc on issues
  • Dean: let's start by collecting feedback on the draft
    • Dick, Karl, others have already indicated there is feedback, others?
  • Karl: I opened a GitHub issue https://github.com/openid/ipsie/issues/61
    • Do we want to start with the strongest foundation, such as FAPI2, or are we starting with a more accessible profile?
    • SAML, as example, doesn't require confidential clients -- how do we want to begin?
    • Do we want to address broader delegated access use cases?
  • Filip: I don't have an answer on whether SL1 should allow public clients
    • Attacker model drives requirements in FAPI... What would attacker model say to drive public client
    • SAML flow is more analogous to response_type=id_token which results in no access tokens issued, the need for client auth likely mostly stems from protecting the issuance of access tokens to protected resources. If SL1 is not about resource access then we should not use flows that result in issued access tokens