2025‐03‐05 Minutes - openid/death-and-the-digital-estate GitHub Wiki
2025-03-05 Minutes
- Attendees
- Dean H. Saxe (Beyond Identity)
- Eve Maler (Venn Factory)
- Mike Kiser (SailPoint)
- Alex B Chalmers
- George Fletcher (Independent)
- Victor Lu (Independent)
- Tim Lloyd
- Dima Postnikov
2025-03-05 Agenda
-
Welcome and antitrust policy reminder
-
Note taker: Eve
-
Agenda bashing
-
Review recent articles / links posted in Slack
- NokBox - https://www.thenokbox.com/
- Physical vs. digital place to store data for others later
- Digital Legacy Association - https://digitallegacyassociation.org
- They have been running a survey and offer some handy resources
- No response to Dean's outreach (yet) - Gareth will try
- NokBox - https://www.thenokbox.com/
-
Capturing Use Cases - 10 minutes
- OSW unconference on "on behalf of" semantics - stay tuned for Mark H's notes
- Any contributions around this today?
- George: Event-triggered delegation with associated revocation of authorization
- How related people prove their relationship is a subset
- Eve mentioned the HEART Profile of OAuth, OIDC, and UMA and the btg claim "break the glass"
- this comes from HL7
- this is a trigger to enable some action to be taken
- this is a form of attribute based access control, e.g. an emergency responder can access the data of an individual who is unconscious from an accident. Later there is an audit trail
- Mark Haine's authority spec in eKYC WG may be related
- Capturing and testing conditions for state changes
- Modeling these relationships and their changes is hard and subtle, implementing even more so
- A court might need to provide a definitive answer to what change should be effectuated, in some cases
- Might wills end up being more "executable" as code?
- Certain physical triggers such as the presence of a MedicAlert bracelet could allow discovery of the guardian/delegate
- Would need some other controls, such as activation / validation by an EMT or emergency - threat model for auto-delegation
- George: Event-triggered delegation with associated revocation of authorization
-
Terminology & Cultural Sensitivity
- How do we manage the differences between how different people & cultures discuss the passing of an individual?
- "Going home" language has a religious context that not everyone may be familiar with
- Can we define clinical terms (medical)? Legal terminology?
- Delegation may be a space where cultural context is helpful - who is delegated to may be dependent
- Mike K has a colleague that is a hospital chaplain that might be able to help us understand how to discuss these topics. He'll ask her to join us at a future date
- perhaps we need a survey to capture how people discuss death and dying?
- Dean to reach out to a friend who is a death doula
- Do we know any people in hospice care?
- Collect perspectives from right-to-die jurisdictions? E.g. Canada
- Ultimately develop a survey?
- Tim suggests some basic categories:
- Affective (emotional) valences - e.g. celebrating with a wake vs. being solemn
- Required events
- Timing of event
- How do we manage the differences between how different people & cultures discuss the passing of an individual?
-
Outlining the White Paper for Cyber Security Awareness Month
- Proposal
- High level content
- Blog - smaller, focused pieces
- Whitepaper - Long form
-
Identiverse - DADE panel needs a lawyer, if at all possible
- Eve to reach out to Scott David [DONE]
- Tim has reached out to Tim R.
-
AOB