To facilitate the evaluation process, we propose a guideline to the presentations of Monday 15th april in Münich.

OpenETCS process

The following picture describe the OpenETCS process as defined during the last meeting in Charleroi.

Yellow elements are inputs, blue elements are part of the design process, red elements are VnV activities, green elements are safety activities. Each line (between dash oar full blue lines) is a phase of the process, with a name on the right. This process is detailled in D2.3.

The aim of the presentations at Munich is to show how the proposed approaches and tools can be used in this process.

Proposed template for the presentations

For the 15 min presentations of Monday we propose the following slides :

The appoach

presentation of the approach : name, semi-formal, formal, language, tools,...

Use in the openETCS process

when the approach can be involved in the OpenETCS process ? for which purposes ?

Benchmark report

what have you covered during the benchmark of the subset 26 ? how ?

Results of benchmark

which are the pros/cons for this experiences ?

Missing elements, on going work

what miss you to design correctly from the subset (documents, high level step or analyses, ... ) ?

Means/ language

do you think your approach is ready to be used in the OpenETCS process and cover WP2 requirements ? or are some part to be adapt or improve ? which effort is needed ?

Tools

What kind of licence ? can the tool be integrated in the OpenETCS project and does it cover the WP2 requirements ? Which is the effort needed to integrate the tool in a open source toolchain (forexemple Eclipse) ?

Conclusion and added elements