DJOERD: medium/high priority -- should this also delete anonymous reviews posted with this account: maybe not?
MARTIJN: We'll give the user an option to either a) delete all their contributions or b) keep them, but make them anonymous.
Search (at least at a paper level)
DJOERD: high priority
MARTIJN: Implementing Django Haystack. After implementation of haystack the features highlighting, spatial search and spelling suggestions could be implemented by different developers @WNoort.
Undetermined:
Test mobile version extensively + create Firefox OS manifest. (I'm just gonna go ahead and mark this as high priority before Djoerd does ;-))
Merge paper tool
DJOERD: medium priority -- I read this as: some way to avoid multiple papers in the system with different IDs? this feature needs some additional thinking. If we -- as always -- take reviews are leading, then you might want to assign a single review to 2 equal papers. This is then an indication that both papers should be merged??
MARTIJN: Exactly. We will postpone this discussion until we'll start implementing it. Changes are 'merging' of papers will be left to the users.
MARTIJN: Since we split up 'add paper' and 'add review' into separate pages, we plan to implement this as a simple search query to the current database. Openreview can ask the user "Did you mean paper X?", which (s)he can choose to ignore or accept.
Reputation for users
DJOERD: medium priority
Add user documentation for LaTeX and Markdown notation.
Users should be able to report reviews as spam
DJOERD: medium priority
Community should be able to edit paper fields, based on a voting system
DJOERD: low priority -- fields like title, authors, etc.?
MARTIJN: Yes.
Automatic verifying of a users status (PhD, Msc, etc.) based on e-mail addresses in known papers
DJOERD: low priority
Model which links author, paper and university.
DJOERD: I do not understand: a paper would be the only valid/possible link?
MARTIJN: It's a way of showing "$author <$university>" as authors can switch (i.e., write for) different universities in their academic career.
Revision control for papers (as they can be edited in a Wikipedia like manner, they can easily be 'trashed'. Other users should be able to reverse those actions.)
DJOERD: ??? - In stack overflow, only the original poster can change the paper... So, I would expect that only the person that added the paper can change it?
MARTIJN: This feature is about adding missing authors, etc. Reviews should not be able to be edited by non-owners indeed.