Meeting Minutes for October 22, 2015 - oasis-tcs/kmip GitHub Wiki
Meeting commenced 8:00PM GMT
- Roll call Tony
- Quorum achieved
Proposed agenda
- Roll call
- Approve Agenda
- Approve minutes
- KMIP 1.3 Status
- KMIP 1.4 Status
- NIST800-57 Update (Chuck W)
- KMIP Query Extension information (David F)
- Proposed update to the description of the Revoke operation (Judy F)
- ASI change scheduling - KMIP v1.3 or v1.4 change?
- RSA2016 Interop Update (Tony C)
- New business
- Adjourn
Motion to approve Agenda
- Bruce Moves
- Tim C Seconds
- No objections
- No abstentions
- Agenda approved
Motion to approve October 15th meeting minutes
- https://wiki.oasis-open.org/kmip/MeetingMinutes/October152015
- Tim H Moves
- Dave F. Seconds
- No objections
- No abstentions
- Minutes approved
KMIP 1.3 status
- Tim H - profiles - Still working on profiles document formatting, plan to send the updates before next week's call and then work on the rest
KMIP 1.4 status
- No updates
NIST 800-57 Update
- Chuck - Performed a study at a relatively high level on what matches with KMIP specification and what does not
- Chuck - Destroyed Compromised state has been eliminated and suspended state has been added. Any idea why KMIP included Destroyed Compromised
- Saikat - KMIP implemented Destroyed Compromised because previous version of NIST 800-57 had Destroyed Compromised. No rationale specified in updated NIST 800-57 of removing this state
- Chuck - Pre-active state - no change, Active - state transition has serious impact on KMIP server implementation
- Chuck - De-activated - Not much impact
- Chuck - Destroying an active key does not make much sense
- Chuck - Key management state model does not match up with the key state and transition model
- Bruce - Human vs. computer making decision may have effect on the new state transition model
- Hal - Destroying key while keeping key meta data for historical reasons, for audit purposes make perfect sense
- Tim - KMIP specification mentions may/should but does not say recommend to keep Metadata
- Tony - is this something that we need to amend in KMIP specification
- Tim - We always go forward in terms of transition, we do not go back but new state model allows to go back in the transition model
- Saikat - Propose that we come up with a concrete set of observations/findings and submit to NIST as KMIP TC instead of individual review comments. This will carry more weight
- Action Item: Chuck to compile review comments and submit on behalf of KMIP TC. Tony will reach out to Chet for official process.
David F. on Query Update
- uploaded doc one line change to description of Query operation clarifies rather than changes to avoid the possibility of interpreting that two lists should come back
- TimH - simple enough to add - and as it doesn't change it could / should go into KMIP 1.3
- Tony - motion to add this to KMIP 1.3
- TimH moves, JudyF seconds.
- No objections. Motion passes
Revoke operation
- JudyF on Revoke operation
- DaveF+TimH discussion which Judy participated in.
- first item add CA compromise - straight forward
- second issue is Compromise Occurrence Date - should this be shall or
should. earlier in spec is noted as should a bit like the context of suspend - when you know when something occurred separate from when you are reporting it. if you have the information on the date then it should be in place - but if it isn't know then recommendation is to set to initial date or leave it blank.
- Option 1 - make it clearer
- Bruce's update also makes sense
- Bruce - likes option 1 with minor english update.
- Tony - motion to apply option 1 to KMIP 1.3
- TimH moves, Krishna seconds
- No objections. Motion passes.
RSA2016 Interop
- Tony C - update Full set of participants
- First call Nov 4th - will be joint call between KMIP and PKCS#11
- Assuming we will at least include KMIP 1.3, could also include KMIP 1.4
- Judy - is interop open to others
- Tony - believes only RSA partipants - will check
- Tim - rules haven't changed - it is up to the participants
- Judy - would like to do a plugfest or interop
- Tim - Cryptsoft willing to do one in November if there is interest
- Tony - anyone interested in a plugfest should let Tony know or send to
the list
Call for late arrivals - Tony C.
- Krishna Y. joined the call
Motion to Adjourned
- Tim H. Moves
- Jerry seconds
- No abstentions
- No objections
- Motion Approved