Project Part 4 Feedback

Code Base of Prototype -- Excellent (3)

• The code is of good quality.
• Package 'network' start with lower case letter, 'Activity' starts with capital letter, this seems violates the code convention.

Tangible Demo -- Good (2)

• Comments from Abram:

• a little spartan
• why can't we scroll?
• background threads, good

• My comments:

• Generally demoable.
• a little strange for the scrolling.
• Could be better prepared.

Code Documentation -- Unsatisfactory (0)

• Have you checked your Javadoc? It has not been generated properly. Little info from Javadoc.
• It is hard for 3rd party to understand your Javadoc.
• The comments are not enough.

Test Case -- Unsatisfactory (0)

• No test codes.

OOD -- Good (1)

• The same UML?
• Have you updated your UML for the new use cases?
• Code is good but the diagram seems not be updated.

Release Planning -- Good (1)

• Use planning included.
• Could be more specific.

Addressing Feedback -- Satisfactory (0)

• The feedback is not sufficiently addressed.

Refactoring -- Excellent (2)

• Refactoring has been properly documented.

Requirement Specification -- Excellent (3)

• Use cases and test cases look good.

Video Demo -- Unsatisfactory (0)

• The link for your video demo?

Manager's Best Pick -- (0)

Summary -- (12)