BadgeKit: Assess - mozilla/openbadges-badgekit GitHub Wiki

Vision

• A tool/service that allows issuers to review and provide feedback to earner-submitted evidence in the application for a badge
• A tool/service that allows users to submit evidence for a badge
• allows authorized individuals to review evidence against criteria and/or rubrics
• A tool/service that allows issuers to develop rubrics / criteria
• A tool/service that allows issuers to choose/set assessment methodologies: expert, peer, self, algorithmic
• A tool to self assess badges, i.e. issue badges to yourself or claim an existing badge
• A tool for stealth assessment, i.e. algorithms for assessing learning ( I see this happening with partners
• Nomination

Subverbs

• submit
• assess
• apply
• review

Existing OB/ Non OB tools:

• Penn State rubric tool
• ForAllRubrics
• p2pu assessment tool

MVP:

Implement Aestemia UI for assessors to review evidence against criteria for evidence-based assessment and develop/Design plugin for applicants to submit evidence

MVP Requirements

• Submitted badge applications need to be reviewed and assessed based on defined criteria.
• Designated mentors with permissions or peers, aka assessors, should be able to go to some site, and see all the badge applications that they are allowed to assess.
• Assessor should be able to click on a badge application and review it against the provided rubric.
• Assessor should be able to provide feedback to the badge applicant.
• Assessor should be able to grant or deny a badge.
• Badge applicant should be notified that they have earned a badge or not earned a badge.

Cupcakes

• Aestemia 2.0;
• Implement common goals https://github.com/mozilla/aestimia/issues/79
• Implement ability for assessor and learner to keep the discussion going through the comments in aestemia. i.e. A tool to self assess badges, i.e. issue badges to yourself or claim an existing badge A tool for stealth assessment, i.e. algorithms for assessing learning
• Nominate yourself or someone for badges