Legal SaaS Flow ‐ Compelte ‐ Anthropic - magicplatforms/ai-workflows GitHub Wiki

Legal AI Platform Sequence Diagrams

Thomson Reuters - Westlaw Precision + CoCounsel

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant W as Westlaw Precision
    participant C as CoCounsel
    participant D as Legal Database

    Note over U,D: Thomson Reuters - Westlaw Precision + CoCounsel
    U->>W: Enter legal research question
    W->>C: Process query with AI-Assisted Research
    C->>D: Search comprehensive legal content
    D-->>C: Return relevant cases, statutes, analysis
    C->>C: Generate synthesized answer with citations
    C-->>W: Present AI-enhanced results
    W-->>U: Display answer with supporting authority links
    U->>C: Request additional analysis (Claims Explorer, etc.)
    C->>C: Apply generative AI skills
    C-->>U: Provide detailed insights and recommendations

LexisNexis - Lexis+ AI with Protégé

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant L as Lexis+ AI
    participant P as Protégé Assistant
    participant D as LexisNexis Database

    Note over U,D: LexisNexis - Lexis+ AI with Protégé
    U->>L: Ask legal question or upload document
    L->>P: Activate Protégé AI assistant
    P->>D: Search comprehensive legal content
    D-->>P: Return relevant materials
    P->>P: Generate draft/summary/analysis
    P-->>L: Present results with citations
    L-->>U: Display response with source verification
    U->>P: Request document drafting
    P->>P: Generate contracts/correspondence based on guidelines
    P-->>U: Deliver personalized legal content

Harvey AI - Custom Legal LLM

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant H as Harvey Platform
    participant C as Custom LLM
    participant F as Firm Knowledge

    Note over U,F: Harvey AI - Custom Legal LLM
    U->>H: Submit complex legal task
    H->>C: Route to appropriate custom model
    C->>F: Access firm-specific training data
    F-->>C: Return contextual legal knowledge
    C->>C: Process with domain-specific intelligence
    C-->>H: Generate tailored legal analysis
    H-->>U: Deliver high-quality professional output
    U->>H: Request document analysis/drafting
    H->>C: Apply specialized legal workflows
    C-->>U: Provide expert-level assistance

Litera - Kira with Smart Summaries

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant K as Kira Platform
    participant A as AI Engine
    participant S as Smart Summaries

    Note over U,S: Litera - Kira with Smart Summaries
    U->>K: Upload contracts/documents
    K->>A: Process with 1,400+ smart fields
    A->>A: Extract clauses and data points
    A-->>K: Return structured findings
    U->>K: Request Smart Summaries
    K->>S: Generate AI summaries of extractions
    S->>S: Create easy-to-read summaries
    S-->>K: Return summarized content
    K-->>U: Display analysis with summaries
    U->>K: Export results for client deliverables

Luminance - Contract AI Platform

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant L as Luminance Platform
    participant AI as Legal-Grade AI
    participant A as Ask Lumi

    Note over U,A: Luminance - Contract AI Platform
    U->>L: Upload contract for analysis
    L->>AI: Analyze with Panel of Judges approach
    AI->>AI: Detect risks and non-standard terms
    AI-->>L: Return risk analysis and suggestions
    L-->>U: Highlight risks with suggested improvements
    U->>A: Ask natural language questions
    A->>AI: Process query about documents
    AI-->>A: Generate legally accurate response
    A-->>U: Provide instant answers and clause drafting
    U->>L: Request contract redrafting
    L->>AI: Generate compliant alternatives
    AI-->>U: Deliver improved contract versions

Relativity - RelativityOne aiR

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant R as RelativityOne
    participant A as aiR Suite
    participant M as Microsoft Azure

    Note over U,M: Relativity - RelativityOne aiR
    U->>R: Upload documents for review
    R->>A: Process with aiR for Review
    A->>M: Leverage Azure OpenAI services
    M-->>A: Return AI analysis
    A->>A: Identify relevant documents and privilege
    A-->>R: Provide recommendations with reasoning
    R-->>U: Display results with transparency
    U->>A: Request privilege review
    A->>A: Apply aiR for Privilege analysis
    A-->>U: Generate privilege log and explanations
    U->>A: Build case narrative
    A->>A: Use aiR for Case Strategy
    A-->>U: Create timelines and case summaries

Ironclad - AI Assist & Contract AI

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant I as Ironclad Platform
    participant AI as AI Assist
    participant C as Contract AI

    Note over U,C: Ironclad - AI Assist & Contract AI
    U->>I: Upload contract for review
    I->>AI: Analyze with AI Assist
    AI->>AI: Compare against company guidelines
    AI-->>I: Generate redline suggestions
    I-->>U: Display tracked changes for approval
    U->>I: Accept/reject AI suggestions
    U->>C: Query contract data
    C->>C: Process complex multi-step analysis
    C-->>I: Return insights and visualizations
    I-->>U: Present actionable contract intelligence
    U->>AI: Request clause drafting
    AI-->>U: Generate custom language based on precedents

Spellbook - Contract Drafting in Word

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant W as Microsoft Word
    participant S as Spellbook Add-in
    participant G as GPT-4o Engine

    Note over U,G: Spellbook - Contract Drafting in Word
    U->>W: Open contract in Word
    W->>S: Activate Spellbook add-in
    U->>S: Request contract review
    S->>G: Analyze document with legal training
    G->>G: Identify risks and missing clauses
    G-->>S: Return suggestions and improvements
    S-->>W: Display recommendations in sidebar
    U->>S: Request clause drafting
    S->>G: Generate new contract language
    G-->>S: Create contextually relevant clauses
    S-->>W: Insert drafted content into document
    U->>S: Ask for contract negotiation points
    S-->>U: Suggest common negotiation strategies

Clearbrief - AI Brief Writing & Fact-Checking

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User/Lawyer
    participant W as Microsoft Word
    participant C as Clearbrief Add-in
    participant E as Evidence Database

    Note over U,E: Clearbrief - AI Brief Writing & Fact-Checking
    U->>W: Write brief in Word
    W->>C: Activate Clearbrief add-in
    U->>C: Upload case documents/evidence
    C->>E: Process and index factual materials
    E-->>C: Create searchable evidence database
    U->>C: Request fact citations
    C->>E: Find supporting evidence for assertions
    E-->>C: Return relevant documents and quotes
    C-->>W: Insert hyperlinked citations
    U->>C: Generate Table of Authorities
    C->>C: Scan document for legal citations
    C-->>W: Create formatted TOA with one click
    U->>C: Fact-check opposing brief
    C->>C: Analyze for factual weaknesses and errors
    C-->>U: Highlight potential issues and rebuttals