Concept selection - m-division-2018-2019/Team-14 GitHub Wiki
Objectives based on their priority
- Dispense the object -10
- Agile -9
- Complexity of Mechanism -8
- Stability -7
Weightage of Objectives(on scale of 10)
Sl.no |
Objective |
Weightage |
1) |
Dispense the object |
10 |
2) |
Agile |
9 |
3) |
Complexity of Mechanism |
8 |
4) |
Stability |
7 |
PUGH CHART
Sl.no |
Objective |
Weightage |
Design 1 |
Design 2 |
Design 3 |
Design 4 |
1) |
Dispense the object |
10 |
++ |
+ |
+ |
DATUM |
2) |
Agile |
9 |
+ |
-- |
- |
DATUM |
3) |
Complexity of Mechanism |
8 |
+ |
- |
- |
DATUM |
4) |
Stability |
7 |
++ |
-- |
- |
DATUM |
|
Negative score |
|
0 |
-40 |
-24 |
0 |
|
Positive score |
|
51 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
|
Total score |
|
51 |
-30 |
-14 |
0 |
Design 1 is selected as a best idea
Justification chart
Design 1
Objective |
Score |
Justification |
Dispense the object |
20 |
Dispensing of object is very easy |
Agile |
9 |
wheels movement is quicker than roller |
Good battery life |
8 |
Complexity of Mechanism is less and feasible due to which Battery lasts long |
Stability |
14 |
Very stable as compared to roller |
Design 2
Objective |
Score |
Justification |
Dispense the object |
10 |
Dispensing of the object is easy |
Agile |
-18 |
Belt drive mechanism is faster than rollers |
Good battery life |
-8 |
Due to more mechanisms battery life doesn't lasts long |
Stability |
-14 |
It's not stable as the contact surface is very less |
Design 3
Objective |
Score |
Justification |
Dispense the object |
10 |
Dispensing is easy as compared to design 4 |
Agile |
-9 |
It's not that fast due to it's circular structure which opposes the speed of the wheel |
Good battery life |
-8 |
Due to many mechanisms battery life doesn't lasts long |
Stability |
-7 |
It's not stable as compared to datum |
Design 4
Design 4 is considered as Datum.