business_context - lgcorzo/rust_CACD_autonomous_factory GitHub Wiki
iso_doc_type: "Description" iso_viewpoint: "ContextView" type: "architecture" title: "Business Context — Dark Gravity CA/CD Autonomous Factory" description: "ISO 42010 ContextView / ISO 15289 Description documentation for Business Context — Dark Gravity CA/CD Autonomous Factory." tags: ['iso42010', 'okf', 'context_view', 'business'] timestamp: "2026-10-01T14:00:00Z" generated: "agent:okf-professional-documenter" verified: "true" last_verified_commit: "fbdc5848"
Business Context — Dark Gravity CA/CD Autonomous Factory
Purpose: Define the business rationale, innovation objectives, and value proposition of the Dark Gravity Autonomous Factory for stakeholders, investors, and compliance bodies.
1. Vision: Continuous Agentic / Continuous Deployment (CA/CD)
The Dark Gravity Autonomous Factory implements a paradigm shift from traditional CI/CD to CA/CD — Continuous Agentic / Continuous Deployment. In this model, AI agents autonomously:
- Ingest issues and PR comments from GitHub, GitLab, and Jira
- Plan implementation via Spec-Driven Development (SDD) with formal specifications
- Code solutions inside gVisor-sandboxed Kubernetes pods
- Validate changes through TDD (Red-Green-Refactor) and SAST security scanning
- Review via heuristic analysis and LLM-powered code judges
- Deliver code changes via PRs/MRs — never auto-merged (Human-in-the-Loop)
This transforms the software engineering lifecycle from a human-intensive, serial process into an agent-accelerated, parallel pipeline with formal governance.
2. Hazitek 2026 Innovation Objectives
The project is funded under the Hazitek 2026 program administered by SPRI (Sociedad para la Promoción y Reconversión Industrial) of the Basque Country government:
| Objective | Target | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomous Code Generation | ≥ 70% of routine tasks handled by agents | Tasks completed / Total tasks |
| Zero-Toil Operations | < 5 min human intervention per mission | Avg. human time per mission cycle |
| Code Quality Assurance | SAST score ≥ 8.0/10.0 on all agent output | SastScanResult.score |
| Security Compliance | 100% Ed25519 NHI credential coverage | Verified credentials / Total missions |
| Financial Control | < €50/day autonomous spend | DailyBudgetConfig.max_daily_budget_usd |
| Documentation Currency | OSR < 5% across all crates | OsrMetric.osr_value |
3. Return on Investment (ROI) Model
Cost Structure
| Cost Center | Description | Tracking Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| LLM Inference | Token consumption across all agents | FinOpsTag virtual headers + spend velocity alerts |
| Compute | gVisor sandbox pod CPU/RAM usage | Kubernetes resource quotas + core-hours telemetry |
| Infrastructure | Kafka, Ziti, Vault, Hatchet hosting | FluxCD GitOps cost attribution |
| Human Oversight | HITL governance time at 4 vertices | Sprint ceremony tracking |
Value Drivers
| Value Driver | Quantification |
|---|---|
| Developer Time Savings | Autonomous handling of lint fixes, test failures, and compilation errors |
| Time-to-Fix Reduction | From hours (manual triage + fix + review) to minutes (agent detection → fix PR) |
| Quality Improvement | Enforced TDD + SAST gates eliminate classes of defects before human review |
| Compliance Automation | Automated R&D audit trail packaging replaces manual engineering timesheets |
| 24/7 Operations | Agents operate continuously; no on-call fatigue for routine remediations |
4. KPI Matrix
mindmap
root((Dark Gravity KPIs))
Velocity
Mission Throughput
Time-to-Fix p50/p95
Tasks per Day
Quality
SAST Score >= 8.0
OSR < 5%
Test Coverage
Cost
Daily Budget < 50 USD
Token Efficiency
Compute Core-Hours
Governance
HITL Compliance Rate
Agent-Stuck Resolution Time
PR Merge Latency
5. Stakeholder Map
| Stakeholder | Role | Primary Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Product Owner | HITL Vertex 1: Strategic Injection | Business alignment, ROI, mission prioritization |
| Tech Lead | HITL Vertex 2: Sprint Mobilization | Task decomposition quality, sprint velocity |
| Architect | HITL Vertex 3: Exception Override | System integrity, deadlock resolution, architectural decisions |
| Senior Reviewer | HITL Vertex 4: Categorical Scrutiny | Code quality, security posture, merge approval |
| DevOps Engineer | Operator | Deployment stability, cluster health, troubleshooting |
| Security Auditor | Compliance | Zero Trust enforcement, NHI verification, SAST coverage |
| R&D Grant Evaluator | Hazitek / SPRI | Innovation output, compute investment, compliance evidence |
6. Domain Vocabulary
See the comprehensive Glossary for all domain terms, architectural concepts, and technical acronyms used throughout this documentation.
Related: Strategic Design · HITL Governance · Compliance & Audit