When you can qsm_hub in your research, please cite the method(s) that you used:
Brain extraction
FSL bet
Smith, S. M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17, 143–155 (2002).
Phase unwrapping
Laplacian-based method
Schofield, M. A. & Zhu, Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Opt
Lett 28, 1194–1196 (2003).
Li, W., Wu, B. & Liu, C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial
variation in tissue composition.
Neuroimage 55, 1645–1656 (2011).
3D best path
Abdul-Rahman, H. S. et al. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm.
Applied Optics 46, 6623–6635 (2007).
Graphcut
Dong, J. et al. Simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift (SPURS) using graph
cuts: application in quantitative susceptibility mapping. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34,
531–540 (2015).
Echo phase combination - Optimum weights
Robinson, S. D. et al. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for MR phase imaging and QSM:
combining array coil signals and phase unwrapping.
NMR Biomed 30, e3601 (2017).
Echo phase combination - MEDI nonlinear fit
Liu, T. et al. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust
quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Magn Reson Med 69, 467–476 (2012).
Background field removal
LBV
Zhou, D., Liu, T., Spincemaille, P. & Wang, Y. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian
boundary value problem. NMR Biomed 27, 312–319 (2014).
PDF
Liu, T. et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole
fields (PDF). NMR Biomed 24, 1129–1136 (2011).
RESHARP
Sun, H. & Wilman, A. H. Background field removal using spherical mean value filtering and Tikhonov
regularization. Magn Reson Med 71, 1151–1157 (2014).
SHARP
Schweser, F., Deistung, A., Lehr, B. W. & Reichenbach, J. R. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic
magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?
Neuroimage 54, 2789–2807 (2011).
VSHARP
Li, W., Wu, B. & Liu, C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial
variation in tissue composition.
Neuroimage 55, 1645–1656 (2011).
iHARPERELLA
Li, W., Avram, A. V., Wu, B., Xiao, X. & Liu, C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and
background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
NMR Biomed 27, 219–227 (2014).
QSM
TKD
Wharton, S., Schäfer, A. & Bowtell, R. Susceptibility mapping in the human brain using
threshold-based k-space division.
Magn Reson Med 63, 1292–1304 (2010).
Shmueli, K. et al. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data.
Magn Reson Med 62, 1510–1522 (2009).
Closed-form solution
Bilgic, B. et al. Fast image reconstruction with L2‐regularization.
J Magn Reson Imaging 40, 181–191 (2014).
LSQR
Li, W., Wu, B. & Liu, C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial
variation in tissue composition.
Neuroimage 55, 1645–1656 (2011).
Star-QSM
Wei, H. et al. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with
large dynamic range. NMR Biomed 28, 1294–1303 (2015).
Wei, H. et al. Imaging whole-brain cytoarchitecture of mouse with MRI-based quantitative
susceptibility mapping.
Neuroimage 137, 107–115 (2016).
Wei, H. et al. Investigating magnetic susceptibility of human knee joint at 7 Tesla.
Magn Reson Med 78, 1933–1943 (2017).
FANSI
Milovic, C., Bilgic, B., Zhao, B., Acosta-Cabronero, J. & Tejos, C. Fast nonlinear susceptibility
inversion with variational regularization.
Magn Reson Med 80, 814–821 (2018).
Bilgic, B. et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1‐regularization and automatic
parameter selection. Magn Reson Med 72, 1444–1459 (2014).
Bilgic, B., Chatnuntawech, I., Langkammer, C. & Setsompop, K. Sparse methods for Quantitative
Susceptibility Mapping. in (eds. Papadakis, M., Goyal, V. K. & Van De Ville, D.) 9597, 959711
(SPIE, 2015).
MEDI
Liu, T. et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single-angle acquisition:
Comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging.
Magn Reson Med 66, 777–783 (2011).
Liu, J. et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using
structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map.
Neuroimage 59, 2560–2568 (2012).
Liu, Z., Spincemaille, P., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y. & Wang, Y. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole
inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility
mapping. Magn Reson Med 79, 2795–2803 (2018).