Release Process - krishanth7/EveryO GitHub Wiki

Release Process

EveryO — Official Release Management & Software Distribution Guide

Plan · Validate · Package · Approve · Publish · Verify

EveryO Python License Packaging

A structured framework for producing trustworthy, reproducible, secure, and well-documented EveryO software releases.

Home · Contributing · Coding Standards · Pull Request Guidelines


Project Maintainer: @krishanth7

Important

Release Authority

Under EveryO's published governance policy, the project maintainer approves release scope, version numbers, changelog content, and published artifacts.

This document combines verified repository configuration with a recommended release procedure. The recommended publishing steps are not evidence that automated PyPI publishing or release workflows have already been configured.


Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Release Philosophy
  3. Current Release Configuration
  4. Versioning Strategy
  5. Release Types
  6. Release Lifecycle
  7. Release Planning
  8. Release Readiness Criteria
  9. Version Preparation
  10. Changelog Management
  11. Testing and Quality Gates
  12. Compatibility Validation
  13. Security and Dependency Review
  14. Building Python Packages
  15. Package Artifact Verification
  16. Clean Environment Installation
  17. TestPyPI Validation
  18. Production PyPI Publishing
  19. Git Tags and GitHub Releases
  20. Release Notes
  21. Release Automation
  22. Rollback and Incident Response
  23. Post-Release Verification
  24. Maintainer Responsibilities
  25. Release Checklist
  26. Troubleshooting
  27. Official References
  28. Next Steps

1. Overview

Software releases are the process of converting validated source code into versioned artifacts that users can install and reproduce.

EveryO's release process should protect:

  • Mathematical correctness.
  • Public API compatibility.
  • Package integrity.
  • CPU-only functionality.
  • Optional backend isolation.
  • Security.
  • Documentation accuracy.
  • Reproducibility.

1.1 Release Objectives

A successful release should provide:

  1. An approved version number.
  2. A reviewed source revision.
  3. Passing required checks.
  4. Valid Python distribution artifacts.
  5. Accurate release notes.
  6. A traceable Git reference.
  7. Verified installation instructions.

1.2 Release Ownership

The project maintainer has final release approval authority.

Contributors may prepare changes, tests, documentation, and release proposals, but contribution does not automatically grant publishing privileges.


2. Release Philosophy

EveryO prioritizes correctness, clarity, and reproducibility.

2.1 Principles

Principle Release Requirement
Correctness Mathematical tests must pass
Stability Regressions must be assessed
Transparency Known limitations must be disclosed
Reproducibility Artifacts must be traceable
Security Dependencies and artifacts must be reviewed
Compatibility Supported environments must be validated
Maintainability Release changes must remain understandable

2.2 Release Integrity

A release must not claim:

  • Unsupported hardware acceleration.
  • Unverified numerical accuracy.
  • Unimplemented features.
  • Unmeasured performance improvements.
  • Unsupported platform compatibility.

2.3 Alpha-Stage Considerations

EveryO currently declares an alpha development classifier.

Users should expect that some APIs may change as the framework evolves.

Alpha status does not remove the need for correctness, security, or transparent documentation.


3. Current Release Configuration

The following configuration is verified from the repository's pyproject.toml.

3.1 Package Metadata

Property Value
Distribution name everyo
Declared version 0.2.0
Python requirement >=3.9
License MIT
Build backend setuptools.build_meta
Build requirements setuptools>=68, wheel
Core dependencies NumPy, Matplotlib
Development status Alpha

3.2 Build System

[build-system]
requires = ["setuptools>=68", "wheel"]
build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"

3.3 Package Definition

[project]
name = "everyo"
version = "0.2.0"
requires-python = ">=3.9"

3.4 Optional Extras

The repository declares:

tensorflow
yaml
onnx
dev
cuda

3.5 Console Entry Point

[project.scripts]
everyo = "everyo.cli.main:main"

3.6 Release History

The inspected changelog records:

0.2.0 — 2026-09-19

It also contains an Unreleased section.

The package metadata and changelog establish the project's declared version; they do not independently confirm publication to PyPI.


4. Versioning Strategy

EveryO's changelog states that the project follows Semantic Versioning.

4.1 Version Format

MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

Example:

0.2.0

4.2 Version Components

Component Typical Meaning
Major Incompatible public API changes
Minor Backward-compatible functionality
Patch Backward-compatible bug fixes

4.3 Pre-1.0 Versions

Under Semantic Versioning, the public API may change during 0.y.z initial development.

EveryO should still document compatibility impacts and provide migration guidance for significant changes.

4.4 Example Version Decisions

Scenario Illustrative Version
Current declared version 0.2.0
Bug-fix release 0.2.1
Feature release 0.3.0
First stable major release 1.0.0

These are examples, not approved future release numbers.

4.5 Pre-Releases

Python packaging supports pre-release identifiers such as:

0.3.0a1
0.3.0b1
0.3.0rc1

Use pre-releases when testing a candidate before general release.


5. Release Types

5.1 Patch Release

Typically contains:

  • Bug fixes.
  • Security fixes.
  • Documentation corrections.
  • Compatible maintenance improvements.

5.2 Feature Release

Typically contains:

  • New tensor operations.
  • New neural network layers.
  • New training functionality.
  • New interoperability capabilities.
  • Approved API extensions.

5.3 Major Release

Typically represents a significant compatibility milestone.

5.4 Pre-Release

Used to validate a candidate before broader adoption.

5.5 Emergency Release

May be needed for:

  • Critical security vulnerabilities.
  • Severe correctness regressions.
  • Broken package installation.
  • Data-loss defects.

Emergency releases still require proportionate validation and maintainer approval.


6. Release Lifecycle

6.1 Recommended Workflow

          Release Proposal
                 |
                 v
          Scope Definition
                 |
                 v
        Maintainer Approval
                 |
                 v
         Version Preparation
                 |
                 v
        Changelog Finalization
                 |
                 v
       Tests and Quality Checks
                 |
                 v
        Security and API Review
                 |
                 v
          Package Building
                 |
                 v
        Artifact Verification
                 |
                 v
       Clean Installation Test
                 |
                 v
          Release Approval
                 |
                 v
       Package Publication
                 |
                 v
       Git Tag / GitHub Release
                 |
                 v
        Post-Release Validation

This workflow is a recommended operational procedure.


7. Release Planning

Before preparing a release, define its scope.

7.1 Release Proposal

A proposal should identify:

  • Candidate version.
  • Intended changes.
  • Relevant issues and pull requests.
  • Compatibility impacts.
  • Known risks.
  • Test requirements.
  • Documentation work.
  • Release owner.

7.2 Feature Freeze

For larger releases, maintainers may establish a feature freeze.

During a freeze, changes should generally be limited to:

  • Bug fixes.
  • Security corrections.
  • Test stabilization.
  • Documentation.
  • Release-blocking fixes.

7.3 Scope Approval

Only the maintainer can approve the final release scope under current governance.

A roadmap item does not guarantee a release date.


8. Release Readiness Criteria

8.1 Functional Readiness

  • Approved features implemented.
  • Release-blocking bugs addressed.
  • Public APIs reviewed.
  • Known limitations documented.

8.2 Quality Readiness

  • CPU tests pass.
  • Ruff lint passes.
  • Formatting passes.
  • Relevant integration tests pass.
  • Package build succeeds.

8.3 Documentation Readiness

  • Changelog finalized.
  • Installation instructions accurate.
  • Examples verified.
  • Compatibility changes documented.

8.4 Security Readiness

  • No unresolved release-blocking security issue.
  • No secrets in artifacts.
  • Dependencies reviewed.
  • Package contents inspected.

9. Version Preparation

EveryO currently declares its version in pyproject.toml.

9.1 Inspect Current Version

grep -n '^version =' pyproject.toml

On Windows, inspect the file directly or use Python:

import tomllib

with open("pyproject.toml", "rb") as file:
    metadata = tomllib.load(file)

print(metadata["project"]["version"])

tomllib is available in Python 3.11 and later. On Python 3.9–3.10, use a compatible TOML reader or inspect the file manually.

9.2 Update Version

Example only:

[project]
version = "0.2.1"

Do not change the version until the proposed release number is approved.

9.3 Version Consistency

Check:

  • Package metadata.
  • Changelog.
  • Documentation badges.
  • Release notes.
  • Git tag.

9.4 Version Source of Truth

The current package metadata is the authoritative declared package version.

If the project later introduces dynamic versioning, document the new source of truth before adopting it.


10. Changelog Management

EveryO maintains:

CHANGELOG.md

10.1 Existing Convention

The changelog follows Keep a Changelog and Semantic Versioning.

10.2 Unreleased Section

During development:

## [Unreleased]

### Added

- New functionality.

### Changed

- Updated existing behavior.

### Fixed

- Corrected defects.

10.3 Release Finalization

At release time, move applicable entries from Unreleased into a versioned section.

Example:

## [Unreleased]

## [0.2.1] - YYYY-MM-DD

### Fixed

- Corrected a verified regression.

Replace the placeholder date with the actual approved release date.

10.4 Changelog Quality

Each entry should explain:

  • What changed.
  • Why it matters.
  • Relevant limitations.
  • Compatibility impacts where applicable.

Avoid unsupported marketing claims.


11. Testing and Quality Gates

11.1 Full CPU Test Suite

python -m pytest -q

11.2 Ruff Lint

ruff check .

11.3 Ruff Formatting

ruff format --check .

11.4 Python Compilation

python -m compileall -q everyo

11.5 Coverage

python -m pytest \
  --cov=everyo \
  --cov-report=term-missing

11.6 Numerical Verification

For tensor and autograd changes:

  • Forward correctness.
  • Backward correctness.
  • Finite-difference gradients.
  • Broadcasting.
  • Numerical edge cases.

11.7 Test Evidence

Record the commands executed and their results.

Do not mark checks as passed unless they actually completed successfully.


12. Compatibility Validation

12.1 Python Compatibility

The project declares Python 3.9 or newer.

The inspected package classifiers explicitly list Python 3.9 through 3.12.

Newer versions should be tested before claiming verified compatibility.

12.2 Operating Systems

Validate relevant behavior on:

  • Linux.
  • Windows.
  • macOS.

12.3 CPU Baseline

The core package must remain usable without:

  • CUDA.
  • TensorFlow.
  • GPU hardware.
  • API keys.

12.4 Optional Backends

Where applicable, validate:

  • TensorFlow interoperability.
  • ONNX export.
  • ONNX Runtime execution.
  • CUDA functionality.

12.5 Compatibility Matrix

Area Validation
Python Supported interpreter versions
CPU Core tests
Windows Installation and relevant tests
Linux Installation and relevant tests
macOS Installation and relevant tests
TensorFlow Optional integration
ONNX Export and runtime comparison
CUDA Hardware-backed verification

Do not claim CUDA validation based solely on CPU fallback tests.


13. Security and Dependency Review

13.1 Security Review

Before publishing:

  • Check for exposed credentials.
  • Inspect newly added dependencies.
  • Review serialization changes.
  • Verify untrusted inputs are handled safely.
  • Investigate known security advisories.

13.2 Dependency Review

Core dependencies currently include:

numpy>=1.22
matplotlib>=3.5

Optional extras should remain optional.

13.3 Package Integrity

Inspect source distributions and wheels before uploading.

Avoid including:

  • .env files.
  • API keys.
  • Private certificates.
  • Local credentials.
  • Internal datasets.
  • Unnecessary build artifacts.

13.4 Private Vulnerability Reports

Follow:

SECURITY.md

Security-sensitive details should not be disclosed publicly before coordinated disclosure.


14. Building Python Packages

EveryO uses setuptools.

14.1 Install Build Tools

python -m pip install --upgrade build twine

14.2 Clean Previous Artifacts

Remove old build outputs carefully.

Linux/macOS:

rm -rf build dist

Windows PowerShell:

Remove-Item build, dist -Recurse -Force -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue

14.3 Build Distributions

python -m build

14.4 Expected Artifact Types

A successful build should produce artifacts similar to:

dist/
├── everyo-<version>-py3-none-any.whl
└── everyo-<version>.tar.gz

Exact filenames depend on the approved version and build configuration.

14.5 Build Output

The build should complete without errors.

Warnings should be reviewed rather than automatically ignored.


15. Package Artifact Verification

15.1 Validate Distribution Metadata

python -m twine check dist/*

15.2 Inspect Artifacts

python -c "from pathlib import Path; print('\n'.join(str(p) for p in Path('dist').iterdir()))"

15.3 Inspect Wheel Contents

from pathlib import Path
from zipfile import ZipFile

for wheel in Path("dist").glob("*.whl"):
    with ZipFile(wheel) as archive:
        for name in archive.namelist():
            print(name)

15.4 Calculate SHA-256

import hashlib
from pathlib import Path

for path in Path("dist").iterdir():
    if not path.is_file():
        continue

    digest = hashlib.sha256(path.read_bytes()).hexdigest()

    print(path.name, digest)

For very large files, stream bytes in chunks instead of reading the entire artifact into memory.

15.5 Verification Criteria

  • Correct package name.
  • Correct version.
  • Valid metadata.
  • Expected source files.
  • No sensitive content.
  • Successful installation.
  • Expected runtime behavior.

16. Clean Environment Installation

A release candidate should be installed in a clean environment.

16.1 Create Environment

python -m venv .release-venv

16.2 Activate

Linux/macOS:

source .release-venv/bin/activate

Windows PowerShell:

.release-venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1

16.3 Install the Built Wheel

python -m pip install dist/everyo-<version>-py3-none-any.whl

Replace <version> with the actual wheel filename.

16.4 Verify Import

python -c "import everyo; print('EveryO import successful')"

16.5 Verify CLI

python -m everyo info

16.6 Smoke Test

import numpy as np
import everyo as eo

x = eo.tensor(
    [2.0],
    requires_grad=True,
)

y = x * x
y.backward()

np.testing.assert_allclose(
    x.grad,
    [4.0],
)

print("Release smoke test passed")

The expected success message is illustrative; run the test to establish actual results.


17. TestPyPI Validation

TestPyPI provides a separate index for testing Python package publication.

17.1 Important Requirement

TestPyPI publishing requires appropriate credentials or a configured trusted-publishing workflow.

Do not place credentials in source files.

17.2 Upload Candidate

For a project and version not already present on TestPyPI:

python -m twine upload \
  --repository testpypi \
  dist/*

17.3 Test Installation

Example:

python -m pip install \
  --index-url https://test.pypi.org/simple/ \
  --extra-index-url https://pypi.org/simple/ \
  everyo==<version>

Replace <version> with the uploaded version.

Caution

When using multiple package indexes, understand dependency-confusion risks. For security-sensitive workflows, use a controlled dependency resolution process rather than assuming one index always takes priority.

17.4 Verify

Check:

  • Package metadata.
  • Dependency resolution.
  • Installation.
  • Imports.
  • CLI behavior.
  • Representative tensor operations.

TestPyPI publication is recommended as a validation step, not an existing EveryO requirement verified from repository automation.


18. Production PyPI Publishing

Production publication requires explicit maintainer authorization.

18.1 Pre-Publication Conditions

  • Version approved.
  • Source revision approved.
  • Changelog finalized.
  • Tests validated.
  • Artifacts inspected.
  • Credentials or trusted publishing configured.

18.2 Manual Publishing

For an authorized maintainer:

python -m twine upload dist/*

18.3 Trusted Publishing

For future automation, prefer PyPI Trusted Publishing using OpenID Connect where supported.

This avoids storing long-lived PyPI API tokens in GitHub repository secrets.

18.4 Publication Verification

After publishing, verify the actual project page and distribution files on PyPI.

Do not assume that a successful local build means the package is publicly available.

18.5 Immutable Versions

PyPI generally does not allow replacing an uploaded distribution file with the same filename.

Corrections normally require a new version.


19. Git Tags and GitHub Releases

Git tags identify specific source revisions.

19.1 Verify Repository State

git status

git log -1 --oneline

19.2 Create an Annotated Tag

Example:

git tag -a v0.2.1 -m "EveryO v0.2.1"

Use only an approved version and verified release commit.

19.3 Push Tag

git push origin v0.2.1

19.4 GitHub Release

Open:

EveryO Releases

Create a release associated with the approved tag.

19.5 Attach Artifacts

Where appropriate, attach:

  • Source distribution.
  • Wheel.
  • Checksums.
  • Release notes.

19.6 Important Ordering

Agree on the publication sequence before creating the final tag or uploading artifacts.

A release tag must point to the exact source revision used to build the published package.


20. Release Notes

Release notes explain changes to users.

20.1 Recommended Structure

# EveryO vX.Y.Z

Release date: YYYY-MM-DD

## Overview

Summarize the release.

## Added

- New functionality.

## Changed

- Behavior changes.

## Fixed

- Corrected defects.

## Compatibility

- Supported Python versions.
- API migration notes.

## Known Limitations

- Relevant limitations.

## Installation

```bash
python -m pip install everyo==X.Y.Z

References

  • Changelog
  • Git tag
  • Relevant pull requests

## 20.2 Release Note Requirements

- Accurate claims.
- No fabricated benchmarks.
- Clear compatibility information.
- Honest limitations.
- Links to relevant source history.

---

# 21. Release Automation

Automated releases can reduce manual errors.

## 21.1 Current Verification

The inspected repository contains package metadata and governance documentation.

However, conventional publishing workflows at:

```text id="20u9ho"
.github/workflows/publish.yml
.github/workflows/release.yml

were not found during this inspection.

This does not rule out differently named workflows.

21.2 Recommended Automation Stages

Git Tag
   |
   v
Validate Version
   |
   v
Run Tests
   |
   v
Run Lint and Formatting
   |
   v
Build Wheel and sdist
   |
   v
Validate Artifacts
   |
   v
Publish via Trusted Publishing
   |
   v
Create GitHub Release
   |
   v
Verify Published Package

21.3 Security Requirements

A future release workflow should use:

  • Restricted publishing permissions.
  • Protected release environments.
  • Explicit maintainer approval.
  • Trusted Publishing.
  • Minimal GitHub Actions permissions.
  • Artifact provenance where supported.

21.4 Workflow Adoption

Release automation should be implemented through a reviewed pull request and approved by the maintainer.


22. Rollback and Incident Response

A published package may contain a critical defect.

22.1 Incident Categories

  • Incorrect numerical results.
  • Broken installation.
  • Security vulnerability.
  • Package corruption.
  • Severe regression.
  • Incompatible dependencies.

22.2 Recommended Response

  1. Confirm the problem.
  2. Assess severity.
  3. Stop or postpone further publication if necessary.
  4. Notify the maintainer.
  5. Investigate the affected version.
  6. Prepare a corrected version.
  7. Validate the correction.
  8. Publish an advisory or release note as appropriate.

22.3 PyPI Limitation

An uploaded package cannot normally be replaced in place.

A corrected release generally needs a new version.

22.4 Yanking

PyPI supports yanking releases to discourage new installations while preserving access for certain exact-version requirements.

Yanking is not equivalent to deleting or replacing a release.

22.5 Git Tags

Avoid silently moving published release tags.

Preserve traceability between source code and distributed artifacts.


23. Post-Release Verification

Release work continues after publication.

23.1 Installation Verification

Test installation from the actual published package index.

23.2 Functional Verification

Run representative examples:

  • Tensor operations.
  • Automatic differentiation.
  • Neural network forward pass.
  • Model training.
  • Serialization.
  • CLI commands.

23.3 Documentation Verification

Confirm:

  • Release notes are accessible.
  • Installation commands are correct.
  • Version badges are accurate.
  • Changelog links work.

23.4 Monitoring

Review:

  • New bug reports.
  • Installation failures.
  • Compatibility regressions.
  • Security reports.
  • Documentation issues.

23.5 Follow-Up Releases

When necessary, prepare a patch release using the same review and validation principles.


24. Maintainer Responsibilities

The maintainer owns final release decisions.

24.1 Before Release

  • Approve scope.
  • Approve version.
  • Review changelog.
  • Confirm required validation.
  • Review security considerations.
  • Approve artifacts.

24.2 During Release

  • Confirm the release commit.
  • Verify publication authorization.
  • Approve package distribution.
  • Confirm Git tags and release notes.

24.3 After Release

  • Verify published artifacts.
  • Monitor regressions.
  • Coordinate security responses.
  • Plan follow-up fixes.

24.4 Delegation

Publishing permissions may be delegated under project governance, but contributors do not automatically receive release access.


25. Release Checklist

Planning

  • Release scope defined.
  • Version proposed.
  • Maintainer approval obtained.
  • Relevant issues and PRs reviewed.

Source

  • Approved changes merged.
  • Version metadata updated.
  • Changelog finalized.
  • Documentation updated.
  • Working tree clean.

Quality

  • CPU tests pass.
  • Ruff lint passes.
  • Ruff formatting passes.
  • Compilation checks pass.
  • Relevant optional backend tests reviewed.
  • Numerical correctness verified.

Security

  • No credentials in artifacts.
  • Dependencies reviewed.
  • No unresolved release-blocking vulnerabilities.
  • Distribution contents inspected.

Packaging

  • Wheel built.
  • Source distribution built.
  • twine check passes.
  • Clean installation succeeds.
  • Smoke tests pass.
  • Artifact hashes recorded where appropriate.

Publication

  • Final maintainer authorization obtained.
  • Package index and project ownership verified.
  • Approved artifacts published.
  • Git tag points to release source.
  • GitHub release created.
  • Release notes published.

Post-Release

  • Published package installation verified.
  • Documentation links checked.
  • Known issues recorded.
  • Follow-up monitoring assigned.

26. Troubleshooting

Build fails because the build module is unavailable

Install the build frontend:

python -m pip install build

Then retry:

python -m build
Twine reports invalid metadata

Review package metadata in pyproject.toml, rebuild distributions, and rerun:

python -m twine check dist/*
Package version already exists on PyPI

Do not attempt to overwrite an existing distribution.

Prepare and approve a new version.

Installed package imports incorrectly

Test in a clean environment, verify the installed version, and inspect the wheel contents.

Release tag points to the wrong commit

Stop publication and coordinate with the maintainer.

Do not silently rewrite an already published tag.

Optional backend tests fail

Verify the backend dependencies, environment, and expected support.

Do not claim optional backend compatibility without successful validation.


27. Official References

Resource Link
EveryO Repository GitHub
Project Configuration pyproject.toml
Changelog CHANGELOG.md
Governance GOVERNANCE.md
Contribution Guide CONTRIBUTING.md
Repository Rules REPOSITORY_RULES.md
Security Policy SECURITY.md
GitHub Releases Releases
GitHub Tags Tags
GitHub Actions Actions
Python Packaging Guide Packaging User Guide
Semantic Versioning semver.org
Keep a Changelog keepachangelog.com
PyPI Trusted Publishing Documentation

28. Next Steps

Continue with the remaining EveryO project documentation.

Wiki Page Focus
Security Policy Vulnerability reporting and secure development
Project Governance Decision-making and maintainer responsibilities
Roadmap Planned technical development
Pull Request Guidelines Review and merge process
Testing and Quality Assurance Testing strategy and CI

Wiki links become active after their corresponding pages are created.


Release Process — Documentation Prepared

Next Recommended Page: Security Policy →

Home · Contributing · Pull Request Guidelines


EveryO — Open Machine Learning. Built for Developers.

Project Maintainer: @krishanth7

Open Source · MIT Licensed · Community Driven

© 2026 EveryO Contributors

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️