relevanceSyntax - jalToorey/IdealMoney GitHub Wiki

(I want to make sure I make record of this general idea...but I'm suffering occipital type stress so I can really know that I wrote this out correct atm)

X can be consider as like the set theory notation { } but rather {x} and even so {...,x,...}.

This lets us refer to the relevant object as 'things such as x' or x with some looser defined boundaries.

Things that are included in x. And we can say x is the relevant subject/object and some other things are included etc.

Then x can be like a bag of stuff but also with a weighted refence to something inside the set etc.

---

We want to ask if we are conditioned to accept things as they are and to use how well we are accepting conditions as our success metric BECAUSE of the control of x or {x} or if we are otherwise fine.

So here we see a function that can be expanded (like the creation of money on a balance sheet from corresponding entries) or collapse. We expand it with our inquiry between the possibilities and collapse it on re-solution. It would be a lot of energy involved in the fluxation.

---

this is x:

https://x.com/NicoleShanahan/status/1821291733696852087

this is x: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1828918312069128268

this is also x or in {x} etc.: https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1829565709690556857

---