I am currently in the beginning phase of performing an extensive literature review on all materials concerning German Renewable energy policy, especially in regards to solar power. The underlying point of this review is to gather and understand all the policies, initiatives, and programs that the German government has employed in order to push solar energy. The hope is that strong parallels can be made in order to recommend actions that the United States can take in order to produce the best climate for solar energy.
Feel free to contribute or help in any way possible.
Jacobsson, S., Lauber, V., 2006. The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology [WWW]. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421504002393 (accessed 1.23.14).
growth history (huge social component)
total R&D numbers German energy (including subs)
good basic hist momentum renewables
feed-ins, incentives, eco-tax, 100,000 Roofs programm provided low-cost loans, subsidies.
-2003ish
Reiche, D., Bechberger, M., 2004.
Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421502003439 (accessed 1.23.14).
define RES per country EU
kyoto target/mandated levels
fixed-feed in tariffs provide security for investors
Brachvogel, F., 2014.
Müller: A fundamental reform of the EEG is a core responsibility for the new German Federal government for 2014 [WWW]. URL http://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/id/20140114-pi-mueller-a-fundamental-reform-of-the-eeg-is-a-core-responsibility-for-the-new-german-fed?open&ccm=900010020010 (accessed 1.23.14). [WWW]. URL
http://www.bdew.de/internet.nsf/id/20140114-pi-mueller-a-fundamental-reform-of-the-eeg-is-a-core-responsibility-for-the-new-german-fed?open&ccm=900010020010 (accessed 1.23.14).
Frondel, M., Ritter, N., Schmidt, C., Vance, C., 2010.
Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies: The German experience [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510001928 (accessed 1.23.14).
~2010, recent
warning for those trying to mirror German policy
Review of EEG (Renewable Energy Sources Act)
tariff walkthrough
net cost PV
claims more cost effective to use ETS( European Emmissions Trading System)
hits jobs
Frondel, M., Ritter, N., Schmidt, C., 2008.
Germany’s solar cell promotion: Dark clouds on the horizon [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508003686 (accessed 1.23.14).
2008 precursor to above art
more focused PV, not wind
Bechberger, M., Reiche, D., 2004.
Renewable energy policy in Germany: pioneering and exemplary regulations [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082608603907 (accessed 1.23.14).
political,structural, and cognitive conditions for success
policies/acts since '89
HTDP/ETR/MAP/EECP/EP/EEG
explores obstacles near end
Weidner, H., Mez, L., 2008.
German Climate Change Policy [WWW]. URL
http://jed.sagepub.com/content/17/4/356.short (accessed 1.23.14).
GHG Emis Trends
CO2 chart pg367
culture of multi-level governance
Hoffman, W., Pietruszko, Viaud, M., 2004.
"Towards an Effective European Industrial Policy for PV Solar Electricity." [WWW] URL
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.203.3598&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 1.23.14)
turn of century trends
relatively short
Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., 2004.
Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology [WWW]. URL
http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/5/815.short (accessed 1.23.14).
Germ, Sweden, Netherlands
inducement/blocking actors
stages: formative>market enlargement (economy of scale advantages)>cummulative causation
R&D dump w/o specific direction>vast "knowledge creation"
Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A., 2006.
A Framework for Guiding Policy-makers Intervening in Emerging Innovation Systems in “Catching-Up” Countries [WWW]. Taylor and Francis Online. URL
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09578810601094902#.UuEhEbQo6Uk (accessed 1.23.14).
evolution of innovation systems(IS)
German IS/arch PV pg15
cummulative causation, feedback loop again
emphasis on identifying system weaknesses to target policy
German case-study useful, application to dev world too simple for US?
Toke, D., Volkmar Lauber, 2007.
Anglo-Saxon and German approaches to neoliberalism and environmental policy: The case of financing renewable energy [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718506001837 (accessed 1.27.14).
UK's Renewables Obligation (RO) vs Germany's REFIT (Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariff)
section 2 neolib background, explaining differing euro philosophies
"market based scheme's" (begin section 4)
RO's set targets that need to be met, otherwise penalized.
penalties are recylced back to ROC, increasing value (but does not encourage monopolies to meet target), actual ~66% in UK.
greater overall risk with RO, uncertain market trends and electricity prices
German REFIT competition: 1. manufacturers must compete in selling. 2. Competition among devs holds costs down. 3. Fosters competition with newcomers.
Must buy all renewables generated
Laird, F., Stefes, C., 2009.
The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: Sources of difference [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509001189 (accessed 1.27.14).
reference many US-German policy papers @ bot
us larger renew resources, discounts that german public opinion is a huge factor (and Americans have similar views, Farhar source/polling)
similar through 70's crisis, diverge late 80's/early 90's
failure of top-down strats for big wind turbines
production tax credit in US, feed-in tariff Germany
less politcal stability in US, low R&D budgets (go back and compare), market volatility
Luthi, S., Wustenhagen, R., 2012.
The price of policy risk — Empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988311001678 (accessed 1.27.14).
section two is a literature review!
conclusion insight policy maker
Lehr, U., Nitsch, J., Kraztat, M., Lutz, C., Edler, D., 2008.
Renewable energy and employment in Germany [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421507003850 (accessed 1.28.14).
employment aspect
net employment hardly affected w/o export of the enery
ntm:Lookup energy in/out of US and neighbors
Sensfub, F., Ragwitz, M., Massimo, G., 2008.
The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508001717 (accessed 1.28.14).
merit-order effect
complex sim
short-term net profit consumers, a lot of future if's
Menanteau, P., Finon, D., Lamy, M.-L., 2003.
Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421502001337 (accessed 1.28.14).
price-based versus quanity based
equal in ideal situations
feed-in tariff>bidding systems
quota-based green certs
Wiser, R., Barbose, G., Holt, E., 2011.
Supporting solar power in renewables portfolio standards: Experience from the United States [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510008499 (accessed 1.28.14).
RPS most common in US
Wind most popular tech w/o solar set asides
growth of PV seen primarily in states with set asides
Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T., Kanie, N., 2012.
Japan’s post-Fukushima challenge – implications from the German experience on renewable energy policy [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512001589 (accessed 1.28.14).
another energy crisis spurs new policy
short, does not add much
Taylor, M., 2008.
“Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California’s solar policy,” [WWW]. Science Direct. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988308000856 (accessed 1.28.14).
page 9,13.
R&D, RPS, establishing value carbon
need for gov't
Van Benthem, A., Gillinghan, K., Sweeney, J., 2008
"Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in California." [WWW]. Science Direct URL
http://piee.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/docs/publications/Learning-by-Doing_and_the_Optimal_Solar_Policy_in_California.pdf (accessed 1.28.14)
learning by doing (LBD) quantization of market failures
optimal subs lead to increase in eco eff.
ultimately lead to self-sufficient solar ind. (potentially)
Grau, T., Huo, M., Neuhoff, K., 2012.
“Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China.” [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512003345 (accessed 1.30.14).
up to 31% G now, 71% max
G: R&D<<deployment http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber="4897348"></deployment>Integration>Service Orientation
Hendry, C., Harborne, P., Brown, J., 2010.
“So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? innovation lessons from solar photovoltaics and wind.” [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510002788 (accessed 2.4.14).
Rand review, DT's
low-end>high transition
Rio, P., Mir-Atrigues, P., 2012.
“Support for solar PV deployment in Spain: Some policy lessons.” [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032112003395 (accessed 2.4.14).
Sovacool, B., 2009.
“The importance of comprehensiveness in renewable electricity and energy-efficiency policy.” [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508007556 (accessed 2.4.14).
four favored policies: elim. subs, accurate pricing, raise public awareness, pass FIT
3.2, rr
budget track
Peters, M., Schmidt, T., Widerkehr, D., Schneider, M., 2011.
“Shedding light on solar technologies—A techno-economic assessment and its policy implications.” [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511005775 (accessed 2.4.14).
PV and CSP (concentrates solar power)
comparison to LCOE
comp around 2020
go back to [31]
Mendonca, M., Lacey, S., Hvelplund, F., 2009.
Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: Lessons from Denmark and the United States [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144940350900006X (accessed 2.11.14).
great U.S policy history (ITC, PTC, all credits, drops, reduction rates)
need consistency
sees FIT as almost neccesary
Butler, L., Neuhoff, K., 2008.
Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148107003242 (accessed 2.11.14).
wind power focus
interesting analysis of RE policy, no solar specifics
Klein, A., Held, A., Ragwitz, M., Merkel, E., Pfluger, B., 2007.
Evaluation of different feed-in tariff design options: Best practice paper for the International Feed-in Cooperation.
thorough design apporaches
comparison of all EU countries
adjustable tariff based on growth
Lesser, J., Su, X., 2008.
Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421507004983 (accessed 2.11.14).
two-part proposed FIT (capacity payment and energy payment)
attempt to avoid overcompensation
rr
Cory, K., Couture, T., Kreycik, C., 2009.
Feed-in tariff policy, design, implementation, and RPS policy interactions [WWW]. URL (accessed 2.12.14).
two methods of return: LCOE (RE generation), estimating value
fixed price vs premium (most fixed)-creates stable projections for investors
smart payment differentiation
addresses FIT RPS conflicts in US!!!
sources pg 9 for fixed vs competitive solicitation articles
few fits in US
rr
Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D., Connor, P.M., 2006.
Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421504002411 (accessed 2.11.14).
price, volume, and balancing risk
2006
Mabee, W., Mannion, J., Carpenter, T., 2012.
Comparing the feed-in tariff incentives for renewable electricity in Ontario and Germany [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511008676 (accessed 2.11.14).
subtly highlights benefits of overlying policy/direction
no binding Canadian/NA goal for renewables, all individual
necessity of degression of FIT pricepoint
2012
Busgen, U., Wolfhart, D., 2009.
The expansion of electricity generation from renewable energies in Germany: A review based on the Renewable Energy Sources Act Progress Report 2007 and the new German feed-in legislation [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508006526 (accessed 2.11.14).
not much new
slightly dated report
Williges, K., Lilliestam, J., Patt, A., 2010.
Making concentrated solar power competitive with coal: The costs of a European feed-in tariff [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421510000777 (accessed 2.11.14).
CSP: Sahara>Europe
interesting, not particularly useful
Solangi, K.H., Islam, M.R., Saidur, R., Rahim, N.A., Fayaz, H., 2011.
A review on global solar energy policy [WWW]. URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111000220 (accessed 2.11.14).
good overview US, Canada, Germany, Spain, France, etc
rr
Search Terms (for my use)
german solar policy (Google Scholar)
german energy policy (Google Scholar)
united states energy policy (Google Scholar)
germany photovoltaic (google scholar)
united states germany solar policy (google scholar)
german solar lessons (Google Scholar)