A template for a peer review when we need to further clean up and de-identify an interview transcript draft

• Please copy and paste the following text box in the same clean up and de-identification issue as a new comment when further cleaning up and de-identification is needed.
• Customize the template by replacing the participant number and the transcript URL in the following template.
• Assign another team member to review the existing transcript to make sure the transcript is readable and follows all the guidelines.
  • The guidelines can be found in the Resources 1.04 and in the peer review template below

We need a round of review on [[Replace PARTICIPANT NUMBER] De-identified Transcript](INSERT FILE URL). Thank you.

### Action Items for Peer Review
- [ ] Review this issue
     - [ ] Read the issue overview to learn about why this document was created.
     - [ ] Locate draft of the document in the Resources.
- [ ] Review resources in 1.04 (see Resources section in the top comment) for easy reference on how to clean up the interview transcripts (those resources are listed below for easier access)
    - [ ] 1.04 [Guidelines to Interviews Page 8](https://drive.google.com/open?id=19580_-BXfHPC9gTcAj35O2nzAtdNwTxp&disco=AAAA_U2KB_A)
        - [ ] 1.04.01 [Conventions for Transcribing Interviews](https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~pchsiung/LAL/interviewing/conventions)
        - [ ] 1.04.02 [Video folder](https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WPzYSrhWYluIqigjsHKpSYIhpQf7XcM5)
        - [ ] 1.04.03 [Cleaning Up Zoom Transcriptions for Qualitative Research](https://crdpala.org/2022/10/05/cleaning-up-zoom-transcriptions-for-qualitative-research/)
        - [ ] 1.04.04 [Determining Best Practice for Filler Words in Captions and Transcripts](https://blogs.vcu.edu/birdlab/2020/01/09/determining-best-practice-for-filler-words-in-captions-and-transcripts/)
- [ ] Review the de-identified transcript (linked in Resources # 2.11)
     - [ ] Preview the draft quickly to get a sense of how the draft is structured and the type of content.
     - [ ] Review the structure of the draft to ensure that the headings (if the draft is in a Google Doc) are clearly identified. 
     - [ ] Review the de-identified transcript against the interview recording file (linked in the Resources # 2.08)
     - [ ] Install [LanguageTool Chrome Extension](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/grammar-checker-paraphras/oldceeleldhonbafppcapldpdifcinji) to clean up the punctuation and verbal ticks in the transcript.
     - [ ] A few guidelines on the transcript formatting:
         1. Use the 'in-line' format as seen [here in RP012 Intern 008's transcript](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yE3M29L0EvjsgawxA6QTijM3diLQpviT-RSk2WgGdM4/edit?usp=sharing)
         1. Use 6 digit format for all the timestamps, for example, 01:01:01 as hour one/minute one/second one
         1. Use "Interviewer" (or "UXR ###" if available) and "Intern ###" throughout the transcript. See an example [here in RP012 Intern 008's transcript](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yE3M29L0EvjsgawxA6QTijM3diLQpviT-RSk2WgGdM4/edit?usp=sharing).
            - If there were more than two people recorded on the transcript, name the third person based on the interview set-up or context, such as Program Manager, Notetaker, etc. If you are not sure what to name them, ask leads on the project to clarify.
- [ ] Provide feedback
     - [ ] Add feedback in the form of (1) questions and/or (2) explicit instructions for how the content should be improved. Feedback in a Google Doc should be given in the form of document comments. 
     - [ ] If there are edits to be made, please use "suggesting mode" in Google doc instead of "editing mode".
     - [ ] Determine the accuracy of the content for each section of the Google doc. If you find an inaccuracy, error, or mis-categorization, explain how the information presented could be improved.
     - [ ] For each suggested improvement, provide a link or reference within your comment to justify your suggestion (if available).
- [ ] Once all the steps have been completed, reach out to the UX Lead to determine if and how the next steps in the issue can be completed.
- [ ] After checking in with UX Lead, leave a comment in this issue you are reviewing to indicate the peer review has been completed.