GB331 - grambank/grambank GitHub Wiki
Are there non-adjacent relative clauses?
Summary
Is there a non-correlative relative clause that is not adjacent to its modified noun? For example, in [The woman] is tall [who has a green hat], the noun (woman) is not adjacent to its modifying relative clause (who has a green hat). It must be possible for the head noun to be any noun, not only an unspecific (pro)noun (e.g. whoever). Do not consider correlative relative clauses for this feature (see GB330). A relative clause is a type of clause that serves to modify a noun. Merely having a verb that modifies the noun does not suffice as evidence of a relative clause. In such cases, it is more likely to be identified as a participle.
Procedure
- Code 1 if a source mentions that there are non-adjacent relative clauses, or that relative clauses may be separated from their head noun by other constituents.
- Code 1 if you find examples in the description of non-adjacent relative clauses.
- Code 0 if a source mentions that there are only adjacent relative clauses, or that relative clauses may not be separated from their head noun by other constituents.
- Code 0 if a source comprehensively describes relative clauses but does not discuss non-adjacent relative clauses.
- Code ? if there are examples that contain potential non-adjacent relative clauses.
- Code ? if the source does not treat relative clauses in much detail and may have missed non-adjacent relative clauses.
Examples
Ottawa (ISO 639-3: otw, Glottolog: otta1242)
For Ottawa, Valentine (2001: 581–582) describes "non-contiguous relative clauses", where the relative clause is separated from its head noun. Ottawa is coded 1.
Mshkikwaaboo gye wgii-wzhitoonaawaa waa-aabjitoowaad.
liquid.medicine and ANIM.PL-made:INANIM REL-ANIM.PL:will.use:INANIM
‘They made liquid medicine that they were going to use.’
(literally: ‘Liquid medicine they made that they were going to use.’) (Valentine 2001: 582)
Pendau (ISO 639-3: ums, Glottolog: pend1242)
For Pendau, Quick (2007: 508) explicitly mentions that relative clauses always immediately follow the argument that they modify. This implies that they cannot be separated from their head noun. Pendau is coded 0.
Further reading
See also the special section on the Grambank wiki on relative clauses.
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Order of Relative Clause and Noun. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Lehmann, Christian. 1986. On the typology of relative clauses. Linguistics 24(4). 663–680.
References
Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin reference grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Quick, Phil. 2007. A grammar of the Pendau language of central Sulawesi, Indonesia. (Pacific Linguistics, 590.) Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Related Features
- GB327 Can the relative clause follow the noun?
- GB328 Can the relative clause precede the noun?
- GB329 Are there internally-headed relative clauses?
- GB330 Are there correlative relative clauses?
Patron
Jakob Lesage