GB093 - grambank/grambank GitHub Wiki

Can the P argument be indexed by a suffix/enclitic on the verb in the simple independent clause?

Summary

Is there a phonologically bound P argument index that follows its verbal host (i.e. attaches to it as a suffix or an enclitic)?

Procedure

  1. Consider the section in the grammar that deals with verbal morphology, specifically the subsections on (pronominal) agreement or argument cross-referencing.
  2. Code 1 if there is a phonologically bound element that indexes the P argument on the verb or auxiliary. The index needs to follow the verbal host it is bound to.
  3. If there is some variation in the position of the P index conditioned by the verb (e.g. most verbs code the A argument with a suffix, but a couple use a prefix), consider only the patterns which occur with large classes of verbs.
  4. If the verb shows overt indexing only with some arguments (e.g. only with animate arguments or only with first person singular arguments, the situation known as differential argument indexing), this still counts as 1.
  5. If the P argument is indexed but not by a suffix or enclitic, code 0.
  6. If there is no indexing of the P argument, code 0.
  7. If only a small set of verbs (fewer than a dozen) indexes P arguments, code 0.
  8. Ignore all other ways of indexing arguments (e.g. via a stem alternation, stress or tone), they are not covered by any of the Grambank features.

Examples

Bukiyip (ISO 639-3: ape, Glottolog: buki1249)

The verb in Bukiyip indexes S, A, and P arguments. The position of indexes varies depending on the verb class (Conrad and Wogiga 1991: 25–33). The following transitive classes are distinguished:

  • Class 1 (transitive, small in number): SBJ-OBJ-V
  • Class 2 (transitive, large in number): SBJ-V-OBJ
  • Class 3 (transitive, large in number): SBJ-(OBJ)-V
  • Class 4 (transitive, relatively large in number): SBJ-V-(OBJ)
  • Class 7 (transitive, one verb, obligatory subject NP): SBJ-V-(OBJ)

It is impossible to identify one major position of P indexes, as both class 2 and 4 (suffixes), as well as class 3 (prefixes) are large in number, so code as 1 for both GB093 and GB094.

Monoken  da         wo   ny-ú-klipw-e              ye?
why      therefore  NEG  2SG.SBJ-IRR-tell-1SG.OBJ  NEG
‘Why didn't you tell me?’ (Conrad & Wogiga 1991: 42)

Korowai (ISO 639-3: khe, Glottolog: koro1312)

Independent verb forms index subject (S and A) person-number, status, mood, and aspect. They are used in independent (final) clauses, subordinate clauses, and chained (medial) clauses. Code as 0 as there is no indexing of the P argument on the verb (see de Vries & van Enk 1997: 87–90, 183).

nu  maun   mi-p
I   water  drink-1SG.INTEN
‘I want to drink water.’ (de Vries & van Enk 1997: 67)
(Abbreviations: INTEN intentional mood)

Further reading

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 198–226. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Siewierska, Anna. 2013. Alignment of verbal person marking. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

References

Conrad, Robert J. & Kepas Wogiga. 1991. An outline of Bukiyip grammar. (Pacific Linguistics: Series C, 113.) Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.

de Vries, Lourens & Gerrit J. van Enk. 1997. The Korowai of Irian Jaya: Their language and its cultural context. (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, 9.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Related Features

Patron

Alena Witzlack-Makarevich