GB071 - grambank/grambank GitHub Wiki
Are there morphological cases for phonologically independent personal pronominal core arguments (i.e. S, A or P)?
Summary
This question is about phonologically independent pronouns only; indexes are irrelevant. Morphological case involves any type of case marking that is phonologically bound (affixes, clitics, tone, alternation, vowel lengthening, etc.). Core arguments are those having S, A or P function. If a bound marker distinguishes S from non-S pronouns, this counts as 1. Optional marking and marking with portmanteau morphemes (e.g. a marker both indicates that a noun phrase is plural and that it has P function) also count.
Procedure
- Code 1 if core case can be marked on pronouns using tone, affixation, suppletion, or any other kind of bound marking.
- Code 0 if core argument functions are only marked on pronouns with phonologically free adpositions.
- Code 0 if core argument functions are only indicated using constituent order.
- Code 0 if case marking on pronouns is not mentioned in the grammar or in the examples. Write 'not mentioned' in the comment column.
- Code ? if you have reason to believe that the author may have missed case markers (e.g. because they do not analyze tone) or specific case-marking functions of other morphemes.
Examples
Eipomek (ISO 639-3: eip, Glottolog: eipo1242)
In Eipomek, phonologically independent pronominal subjects may be marked with the bound morpheme -de (Heeschen 1998: 171–172). Eipomek is coded 1.
na-de bo-am-ne-buk, an-de dob-nama-lam
1SG-S carry-PRF-1SG.PRS-when 2SG-S take-FUT-2SG
‘It is me who has carried it, and you will take it.’ (Heeschen 1998: 172)
Lardil (ISO 639-3: lbz, Glottolog: lard1243)
Lardil has different pronouns for different case functions (Klikeid 1976: 107–108). Lardil is coded 1.
Nominative | Accusative | |
---|---|---|
1SG | ngata | ngithaa-n |
2SG | nying-ki | ngimpee-n |
3SG | ni-ya | niwee-n |
Abun (ISO 639-3: kgr, Glottolog: abun1252)
In Abun, there are no morphological cases at all, not for pronominal noun phrases and not for non-pronominal noun phrases. It is coded 0 for this feature (Berry & Berry 1999: 48–49). Argument functions are solely indicated by means of word order:
a. men kas
1PL run
‘We ran.’ (Berry & Berry 1999: 49)
b. men gwa Isak
1PL hit Isak
‘We hit Isak.’ (Berry & Berry 1999: 49)
c. Isak gwa men
Isak hit 1PL
‘Isak hit us.’ (Berry & Berry 1999: 49)
Further reading
Comrie, Bernard. 2013. Alignment of Case Marking of Pronouns. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Haspelmath, Martin 2009. Terminology of Case. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The Oxford handbook of case, 505–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spencer, Andrew. 2009. Case as a morphological phenomenon. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The Oxford handbook of case, 185–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Note that Spencer does not count clitics as morphological case, while in Grambank they are counted as such.)
References
Berry, Keith & Christine Berry. 1999. A description of Abun: a West Papuan language of Irian Jaya. (Pacific Linguistics: Series B, 115.) Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Heeschen, Volker. 1998. An ethnographic grammar of the Eipo language. (Mensch, Kultur und Umwelt im Zentralen Bergland von West-Neuguinea, 23.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Klokeid, Terry J. 1976. Topics in Lardil grammar. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Related Features
- GB070 Are there morphological cases for non-pronominal core arguments (i.e. S, A or P)?
- GB072 Are there morphological cases for oblique non-pronominal NPs (i.e. not S, A or P)?
- GB073 Are there morphological cases for phonologically independent oblique personal pronouns (i.e. not S, A or P)?
- GB074 Are there prepositions?
- GB075 Are there postpositions?
- GB105 Can the recipient in a ditransitive construction be marked like the transitive patient?
- GB408 Is there any accusative alignment of flagging?
- GB409 Is there any ergative alignment of flagging?
- GB410 Is there any neutral alignment of flagging?
Patron
Jakob Lesage