Jan 20, 2025 ‐ 16:00 UTC - elisa-tech/wg-systems GitHub Wiki

Host:

  • Philipp Ahmann

Participants:

  • Rinat Shagisultanov
  • Sebastian Hetze
  • Nicole Pappler
  • Daniel Weingaertner
  • Troy Sabin
  • Gabriele Paoloni (2nd half)

Regrets:

  • ...

Attended Recently

  • Walt Miner
  • Steven Carbno
  • Karen Bennet
  • Roberto Paccapeli
  • Alfred Strauch
  • Kate Stewart
  • Thomas Mittelstädt
  • Stewart Hildebrand
  • Olivier Charrier

Topics & Notes:

Check past action items

  • Previous meeting notes: https://github.com/elisa-tech/wg-systems/wiki/Nov-25,-2024-%E2%80%90-16:00-UTC
  • AI-Sebastian: Involvement of DIN can also be interesting. Sebastian will take a first contact.
    • Communication started. Another meeting scheduled in Feb.
  • AI-Philipp: Invite the epam people to tell a bit about their work and planned activities.
    • No feedback from epam so far. Need to follow up.
  • AI-Philipp: Reach out to Thomas M. and Andreas B. for enabling Pi5 with Xen and Zephyr
  • AI-Philipp: Response to new Railway WG idea from Sebastian.
    • Mail dropped waiting for response.

Elisa documentation directory (info)

Good Quality Practices in Open Source [cont.]

  • Worked on gdoc draft to work for the LFE requests: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Uzp4-mAAOd9uMhyKx5Vaa0C8Mq5w1IxhHFAgyE0I9p0
  • main thing to do in Project Phases: Effort estimation and a bit clearer work package description.
    • Outcome: Base for financing and show who to involve for execution.
  • See latest updates in the document to come to work breakdown structure.
  • Request access to make suggestions in case you do not have access rights.

AoB

  • Troy joins first time as a colleague of Rinat
  • standards-atlas introduction by Sebastian (⭐ = something completely new today)
    • https://github.com/shetze/standards-atlas
    • relate standards to each other
    • doorstop tooling
    • shows similarities and overlaps of different standards using scores.
    • Just as information, there have been also other projects researched cross domain standards.
    • Size of the bubbles in the diagram is the resonance of the clauses in finding relationships.
    • The more generic the clause is, the less significant it is.
    • Quoting the standards on this level was approved by the standard provider and is also mentioned in the project sources.
    • Still in a research PoC state.
    • Requires more feedback to get actual demand.
    • Use case: safety certification against specific standard. Where does it make it easier to certify in another industry/standard.
    • Tool is useful and is worth a dedicated meeting. Licensing can be an issue in the wider adoption and distribution.
      • Copyright discussions are already ongoing
      • Tooling is locally with local model. This means you need to own the pdfs from the standards.
      • The relationships have no content from the standards.
  • Regular meeting on Jan 27th. No meeting Feb 3rd due to FOSDEM travel.