NET150 03 Journal - eitan-j/tech-journal GitHub Wiki
-
ipconfig gives network info
-
ipconfig /all gives more ip info
-
ping [addr] test connectivity to [addr]
-
tracert [addr] shows hops to [addr]
-
nslookup [addr] requests info for [addr] from DNS
- Command prompt
- Connect to Xubuntu VM
-
passwd to change password
- Add user in Xubuntu
-
whoami to show user
-
sudo -i to become root
-
ip addr and ifconfig for network info
-
ping [addr] test connectivity to [addr]
-
arp -a to show ARP cache
- Installed wireshark
-
apt install [program] -y to install program
- Added eitan to wireshark group
- Relogged
- Used wireshark
- Modified previous network with VLSM
- Switched to RIP v2
- I actually got the table spot on
- I did mess up converting the manufacturing network CIDR to netmask
- Assigned IP and netmask to computers
- Manufacturing network mask was wrong
- Enabled RIP v2 on both routers
- NA router didn't have enough ethernet ports
- Added RJ45 port module to NA router
- Integrated ethernet connections were not connecting at all
- Added RJ45 port module to Mumbai router
- I later realized that I just forgot to turn their interfaces on
- Module-added connections could not be assigned IP addresses
- The module I added was actually for "switching ports"
- The routers I had chosen didn't have any modules that added layer 3 ports
- Replaced both routers with ones that supported layer 3 ports
- I didn't need to replace the Mumbai router, but I did
- Reconfigured new routers
- All computer pings failed
- Packet was being sent to MAC address of old router
- Reset ARP cache
- Pings between the two locations failed
- I forget to enable RIP v2 on Mumbai router
- Pings between the two locations still failed
- It just started working after awhile without me doing anything???
- Only the first ping fails, subsequent pings work
- Static Routing
- Pings sometimes seem to fail on first try and work subsequently
- Used RIP v2
- This seems like the same stuff we've already done in week 6
- More RIP v2
- Similar to Lab 10.1
- Set up wireless network
- I spent a long time troubleshooting
- The issue was that I didn't configure the network subnet
- I think the GUI of the wireless router is really bad
- The IP address fields are all split so you have to press tab to get to the next field
- The subnet mask is entered using a drop down menu
- Saving
- The save button is not visible on the screen by default
- It allows you to exit a page without saving without any prompt
- In the top submenus, the active page is white while the disabled pages are light gray, and the other pages are black on dark blue
- It has a text on the right that says "Help..." as if it's a button or link, but it's just normal text
- I could not find any way to access a CLI
- Basically I just hate this GUI
- My network is currently using a /27 mask, which allows a maximum of 30 hosts
- During the day, there should be around 100-150 devices on this network, so this should not be working
- I looked at my phone, and it's on a different network, even though it's on the same network
- Using an android terminal emulator (isn't it cool that that exists!), I found that my phone is on 69.5.123.0/25
- This is what I remember the computer also being on before
- At this point I have pieced it together in my head
- Prior to around a month ago, we were just on the /25 network
- This only has room for 126 hosts
- This allowed most, but not all devices to connect simultaneously
- During peak hours, one could sometimes not connect
- At any time, it would take a few seconds to a few minutes to connect to the network
- People complained about this
- Someone got us more IP addresses
- They probably couldn't just increase to a /24 because 69.5.123.128/25 is probably already allocated to somebody else
- So they gave us a non-adjacent IP range
- I just realized that my laptop has always connected to the internet instantly since around a month ago
- The two different subnets probably won't effect anything, other than allowing more hosts
- Now the network can handle 156 hosts, which should be enough
- It's also possible that there is another subnet that I'm unaware of, but that wouldn't make sense to do.
- Messed around with FTP
- Newer versions of Firefox have FTP disabled, and need to have a setting changed
- Future versions of Firefox are planned to remove ftp altogether
- FTP is very not secure
- FTP commands
⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️