Guidelines on Documenting Government Decisions 2019 - digitalspace/eagle-demi GitHub Wiki
Documenting Government Decisions Page 1 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
CHIEF RECORDS OFFICER GUIDELINES
ON DOCUMENTING GOVERNMENT DECISIONS
Purpose These guidelines assist government bodies in meeting their obligations under the Information Management Act (IMA) related to documenting their decisions. Government bodies must refer to these guidelines and CRO Directive 01-2019 (Directive) in considering whether their practices are sufficient to meet the obligations under the IMA. The Chief Records Officer (CRO) may provide further guidance on documenting decisions of government bodies, as necessary or appropriate. Application These guidelines apply to all British Columbia government ministries and any government agencies designated as “government bodies” under the IMA.1 Other government agencies not currently covered by the IMA may use these guidelines as a best-practice tool. These guidelines do not limit any other statutory or legal requirements respecting the creation or maintenance of records of government body decisions, or any other government information. Background Section 19 (1.1) of the IMA requires that government bodies have an appropriate system in place for creating and maintaining government information that is an adequate record of their decisions.2 The Directive sets out the components of an appropriate system for creating and maintaining government information, and what constitutes an adequate record. These guidelines expand on the Directive. Together, the Directive and these guidelines provide a principle-based framework that government bodies are to operationalize in a manner suitable to their respective mandates. Government bodies should ensure that they can demonstrate compliance with the IMA, the Directive and these guidelines.
1 http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/loo102/loo102/109_2016
2 Section 19 (1) of the IMA also stipulates that the head of each government body is responsible for ensuring that an
appropriate system is in place within their organization for managing and securing government information. This directive does
not provide information or advice about the appropriate system for managing and securing government information.
Why Document Government Decisions?
• Supports openness and
transparency
• Facilitates effective decision
making
• Preserves corporate memory
• Supports employees in doing their
jobs effectively and providing high-
quality services to the public
• Supports accurate reporting of
decisions to stakeholders, including
other government bodies and the
public
• Contributes to the Province’s
historical record for future
generations
Documenting Government Decisions Page 2 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
All government bodies are expected to have the
appropriate combination of people, processes and
technology in place to ensure that government
information is created, held, transferred, archived and
disposed of in accordance with the IMA. This includes
adequate records of decisions.
The head of a government body must consider these
guidelines and the Directive in ensuring that they have
an appropriate system in place.
As part of good government and accountable public
administration, government has policies, processes and
procedures in place to support the appropriate
creation and maintenance of government information
in accordance with the IMA.
The Government Records Service (GRS) within the
Corporate Information and Records Management
Office (CIRMO) is available to assist government bodies
in meeting their information management obligations,
including those related to adequately documenting
their decisions.
Identifying Decisions that Should Be Documented
Government bodies do not have to create and keep records of every decision made by every employee.
Government bodies need to identify which decisions are to be documented by applying their
judgement, in the context of their specific mandates and with consideration to the purpose and intent
of the IMA, the Directive and these guidelines, and other obligations that may exist in law and policy
respecting documenting decisions.
To help determine if a decision is required to be documented under the IMA, refer to the attached
decision flowchart in Appendix A and to these guidelines.
A government body should document a decision where a record would serve one or more of the
following purposes:
• Informing the government body or others about the evolution of the government body’s
programs, policies or enactments;
• Protecting the legal or financial rights or obligations of the government body, the Crown, or any
person, group of persons, government or organization that is directly and materially affected by
the decision;
• Facilitating the government body’s accountability for its decisions, including through internal or
external evaluation, audit or review.
Line of Business Decisions
In assessing which line-of-business decisions are to be adequately documented under the IMA,
government bodies must bear the above purposes in mind. Government bodies also should document
statutory decisions and decisions respecting a course of action that directly and materially affects a
person, group of persons or organization.
Getting Started
Identifying and Documenting Decisions
Step 1: Ascertain whether the decision
needs to be documented under the IMA
(Appendix A)
Step 2: Determine whether the current
practice will result in an adequate record of
the decision (Appendix B)
Ensuring an Appropriate System is in Place
Consider whether the prescribed elements
of an “appropriate system” are in place
within the government body (Appendix C)
Addressing Identified Gaps
If necessary, conduct a gap analysis and
identify remedial actions
Documenting Government Decisions Page 3 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0 March 31, 2019 Contextual Information An adequate record of any key decision must include the material contextual information that informed the decision.
This information can be in many formats and will vary significantly depending on the nature of the decision.
Contextual information may typically be
found in the following formats:
• A decision briefing note
• An application form
• An entry in a case management
system or a case file
• Other records (e.g., memos, letters,
emails) containing advice,
recommendations and/or options
• Records of verbal advice
• Treasury Board Staff and Legislative
Counsel advice to Cabinet
• Legal opinions
• Appendices or attachments that
could include such things as: medical
information, education information,
employment information, income
information, or other program-
specific information that supports
accountability, protects the rights or
obligations of affected parties, or is
otherwise necessary to understand
the decision
Often, documenting decisions made by Senior Executive (i.e., Deputy Minister or equivalent, Assistant
Deputy Minister or equivalent), members of the Executive Council, administrative tribunals or other
quasi-judicial decision makers will meet the above purposes. There will, however, be circumstances
where, in order to adequately document line-of-business decisions in light of the above purposes, a
government body will document decisions made outside Senior Executive.
Common Corporate Decisions
Common functional areas where decisions are typically documented according to generally accepted
policies and procedures include:
• Decisions related to preparing legislation;
• Decisions related to
o strategic policies that define or change
corporate direction, or
o programs or initiatives to fulfill the
government body mandate;
• Human resources (HR) decisions;
• Budget and other financial decisions; and
• Procurement decisions.
Adequate Records of Decisions
Government body employees must take reasonable
steps to ensure that adequate records of decisions are
created and maintained.
The Directive defines the elements of an “adequate
record” of a government body’s decision. Adherence
to common corporate practices will generally support
alignment with requirements to adequately document
decisions. Those practices are to be considered, along
with the following guidance.
In general, a record of decision is adequate if it can
reasonably be expected that someone not familiar
with the decision could be reasonably informed about
the following, as applicable:
• Who made the decision and under what
authority;
• When the decision was made and, if
appropriate, when it takes effect;
• Who is reasonably likely to be directly and
materially affected by the decision and, where
practicable, the way in which they are
reasonably likely to be affected by the
decision; and
• What are the basis for and context in which
the decision was made, including, as applicable, any relevant legal, policy or factual information.
Documenting Government Decisions Page 4 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
Not all of these factors will apply to every decision. For example, many decisions do not affect others, so
it is not necessary to document who is reasonably likely to be affected or how. Government bodies are
expected to carefully consider, in the circumstances of each case, what is required to adequately
document a decision. In some cases, an adequate record of a decision may be a note in a case
management system or case file; in others it may comprise copies of extensive studies.
It is also important to remember that a record is required to be “adequate”, not “perfect”.
In addition, it is not necessary for a single record to be created that contains all of the material
contextual information. The amount and type of contextual information that is adequate will vary
depending on the nature of the decision.
Adequate Records of Common Corporate Decisions
Statutory Decisions
Government bodies will generally have existing policies and guidance on documenting relevant statutory
decisions. In general, an adequate record of a statutory decision should include a statement setting out
the specific decision in the form of a directive, order, authorization or permit, confirmation of eligibility
for a benefit or service, etc. Other material contextual information (such as the decision’s legal
authority), and reasons for the decision, may be required.
Decisions Related to Preparing Legislation
Adequate records must be created during every step of preparing any enactment, including Bills,
regulations and ministerial orders. This includes initial information gathering and analysis, developing a
request for legislation, and the drafting process.
Before a government body’s policy initiative can proceed to a proposal for legislation and the drafting
stage, a substantial amount of information must be gathered and assessed. Cabinet Operations provides
detailed information on requirements for Cabinet decision documentation, and the Office of Legislative
Counsel provides information on the preparation of drafting instructions. These requirements are to be
complied with.
Decisions About Government Body Policies and Programs
Decisions that establish, change or terminate corporate direction, or programs or initiatives to fulfill the
government body’s mandate, should be documented. Adequate records of decisions related to
establishing, changing or terminating policies or programs must include a record of decision (e.g., any
one or more of an approved decision note or a Cabinet or Treasury Board submission, as applicable).
HR Decisions
The BC Public Service Agency (BCPSA) maintains detailed guidance for ministries on documenting
various HR decisions. This includes guidance on hiring, managing attendance, illness and injury, and
taking disciplinary actions. Government bodies must comply with BCPSA guidance on documentation of
HR-related decisions.
In the absence of similar policies, government bodies that are not subject to the Public Service Act may
wish to use the BCPSA guidance as a model to determine what constitutes an adequate record of
decisions related to HR matters.
Documenting Government Decisions Page 5 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
Budgeting and Other Financial Decisions
The Core Policy and Procedures Manual (CPPM) Chapter 3: Planning, Budgeting and Reporting covers all
aspects of government financial management, including documentation. Government bodies must
comply with CPPM Chapter 3 in relation to documentation of financial management decisions.
Government bodies not subject to CPPM will generally have their own financial policies that address
documentation. They may use CPPM Chapter 3 as a model to determine what constitutes an adequate
record of decisions related to budgeting and financial decisions.
Procurement Decisions
Government bodies regularly make decisions regarding various types of procurement, including goods
purchasing, contractor services and information management/information technology procurement.
CPPM Chapter 6 covers all aspects of government procurement and states that ministries are
responsible for “planning, managing and fully documenting the process to acquire goods, services and
construction.” Government bodies must comply with CPPM Chapter 6 in relation to documentation of
procurement-related decisions.
Government bodies not subject to CPPM will generally have their own procurement policies that
address documentation but may also use CPPM Chapter 6 as a model to determine what constitutes an
adequate record of decisions related to procurements.
Appropriate System for Creating and Maintaining Records of Decisions
The IMA requires each government body to ensure that an “appropriate system” is in place for creating
and maintaining records of decisions.
The Directive defines the elements of an appropriate system for creating and maintaining government
information that is an adequate record of a government body’s decisions. An appropriate system must
include the components discussed below. To help determine if you have an appropriate system for
creating and maintaining decisions, refer to the following guidance and to the flowchart in Appendix C.
Many aspects of an appropriate system are already
addressed under the corporate information
management framework, which comprises information
management legislation (including the IMA, FOIPPA
and their regulations), ministerial orders and
ministerial or CRO directives, and, for ministries, CPPM
Chapter 12: Information Management and Information
Technology Management. The entirety of this
information management framework should be
considered when creating and administering an
appropriate system consistent with the Directive and
these guidelines.
Defined Roles and Responsibilities
The CRO has a statutory mandate under the IMA to provide leadership, direction and oversight, and to
promote effective information management across government bodies. GRS is the central organization
responsible for records management, including developing policies, guidelines, standards and training to
assist government bodies in identifying appropriate information schedules, establishing recordkeeping
systems, and ensuring records are preserved and accessible as required and appropriate.
What Is an “Appropriate System”?
An “appropriate system” for documenting
government decisions is about more than
technology. It includes policies, processes,
roles, responsibilities and controls
necessary to ensuring that adequate
records of decision are created and
maintained.
Documenting Government Decisions Page 6 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
Section 19 (1.1) of the IMA stipulates that the head of each government body is responsible for ensuring
that an appropriate system is in place within their organization for creating and maintaining, in
accordance with applicable CRO directives or guidelines, government information that is an adequate
record of that government body's decisions.
To support the overarching governance structure for an “appropriate system”, government bodies
should clearly define roles and responsibilities for information management within their respective
organizations. This can include designating staff to champion and promote information management
within their program areas. Such staff should be at a sufficiently senior level and have relevant
knowledge and skills. They should also have clear authority, and clear, committed and ongoing Senior
Executive support, respecting all aspects of information management (including documentation of
decisions).
However, it is also important to recognize that employees at all levels actively manage government
information in the course of their daily work. Accountabilities should be clearly articulated to assist
government bodies in meeting their business goals and to ensure that legal obligations are met. All
program area staff should have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities for documenting
decisions.
Some decision making is formally or informally delegated. Some examples of formal delegations of
decision making include:
• delegations to government body expense authorities;
• persons delegated any of the director’s powers, duties or functions of a Minister or official
under an act. (Some laws require these delegations to be in writing.)
Some responsibilities will be established more informally, such as through job descriptions, training,
policies or procedures, or even through system design and workflows.
For example, a government body employee may be responsible for preparing a briefing note for
decision by a Senior Executive about a significant public policy matter. They may have the delegated
authority to make a decision about an individual’s eligibility for a program, service or benefit. The same
employee may be entitled to make spending
decisions up to a certain dollar amount, and may be
accountable for making and keeping records related
to HR matters for their direct reports. No matter how
the accountability is delegated or assigned, the
government body’s policies, procedures and training
should make it apparent to each employee what their
accountabilities are with respect to creating and
maintaining adequate records of government
decisions.
Documented Policies and Procedures
As noted earlier, a robust high-level information
management framework already exists for ministries.
This corporate framework comprises information
management legislation such as the IMA, associated
regulations, CRO directives, as well as CPPM Chapter
12. Non-ministry government bodies may use the
existing corporate framework as a foundation for their own policies and procedures.
Common Types of Government Body
Recordkeeping Systems
• Structured Local Area Network (LAN)
with the Administrative Records
Classification System (ARCS) and
Operational Records Classification
Systems (ORCS) applied, as
appropriate
• Enterprise Document and Records
Management System (EDRMS)
o EDRMS Content Manager (formerly
TRIM) is the government standard
• Line of business applications (e.g., case
management systems)
• Hardcopy (paper) filing systems
Documenting Government Decisions Page 7 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
Each government body knows its own lines of business best and is therefore best placed to develop
organization-specific policies and procedures regarding an appropriate system for creating and
maintaining information.
Government bodies create records for many different legislated, policy and operational reasons.
Government bodies should consider identifying what policies, procedures, training and awareness
activities, and compliance and monitoring tools are already in place with respect to documenting their
decisions. This will enable them to determine if gaps exist or changes to their existing approach are
needed. When changes are required, the government body is best placed to develop its own specific
policies and procedures to establish and operate an appropriate system for creating and maintaining
information, including adequate records of decisions.
Appropriate Recordkeeping Systems
Government information must be created and maintained in accordance with corporate records
management policy and standards. This applies to the creation and maintenance of adequate records of
decisions.
An appropriate recordkeeping system should:
• contain logical, organized naming conventions that can be followed by all staff;
• ensure the preservation and accessibility of records over time;
• protect against accidental or unauthorized access, alteration, copying, movement or deletion;
• minimize duplicate storage of records; and
• permit the retention requirements of information schedules to be applied accurately and
efficiently.
Information schedules describe and classify government information and specify how long information
must be kept. They are approved by the CRO under the IMA3 and set out the final disposition of a record
(i.e., whether it will ultimately be transferred, archived or destroyed). By law, if no information schedule
applies, the information must be held until the CRO approves an information schedule or the
information’s transfer, archiving, or disposal. If a government body does not have an approved
information schedule, it should document internal policies and procedures for ensuring information is
retained as appropriate in light of the nature and content of the information.
Training and Awareness
All employees need to have a clear understanding of their responsibilities related to creating and
maintaining government information, including records of decisions. At a minimum, ministries must
ensure employees take mandatory information management training (e.g., IM 117: Protection of
Privacy, Access to Information and Records Management). CIRMO has also prepared materials for all
government bodies to support them in complying with their obligations respecting creating and
maintaining government information that is an adequate record of government body decisions. There
may be also be government body or sector-specific training appropriate to some roles and
responsibilities. This includes the appendices to this directive, training, and more.
3 Any “record schedule” approved by the Legislative Assembly under the Document Disposal Act between 1936 and 2016 is continued under the IMA.
Documenting Government Decisions Page 8 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0
March 31, 2019
Compliance Monitoring
Government bodies should proactively monitor and assess their activities, practices and processes to
ensure that they are meeting expectations respecting the creation and maintenance of government
information. This includes the creation and maintenance of adequate records of decision. This will help
ensure their organizational needs are met and that the government body is compliant with the
Directive, these guidelines, and applicable policy and law.
CIRMO’s Information Management Practice Review Program works with ministries to facilitate self-
assessments of their information management practices, including the obligations in the IMA respecting
documenting government decisions. CIRMO will also conduct practice reviews to assess the maturity of
the information practices implemented by ministries to foster the continuous improvement of those
practices. Other public bodies subject to the IMA may wish to use this tool to monitor and assess their
own activities.
Contact Information
Government Records Service
Corporate Information and Records Management Office
Ministry of Citizens’ Services
Email: [email protected]
Documenting Government Decisions Page 1 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0 March 31, 2019 Appendix A
Documenting Government Decisions Page 2 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0 March 31, 2019 Appendix B
Documenting Government Decisions Page 3 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0 March 31, 2019 Appendix C
Documenting Government Decisions Page 1 CRO Guidelines – Version 1.0 March 31, 2019 Appendix D: Additional Resources • Core Policy and Procedures Manual (CPPM) combines government-wide financial policy, management policy and financial administration procedures into a single online resource: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-for-government/core-policy • The Recorded Information Management Manual (RIMM) provides supporting policy for government records management practices: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/policies- procedures/government-records • Appropriate Use Policy establishes the policy requirements that all government employees must follow when accessing and managing government information and using information technology resources: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/british-columbians-our-governments/services- policies-for-government/policies-procedures/appropriate-use-policy/appropriate_use_policy.pdf • IM 117: Protection of Privacy, Access to Information and Records Management is a mandatory online course for all government employees available through the BC Public Service Learning Centre. • ARCS and ORCS User Guide 2015 (Version 3.0): https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/british- columbians-our-governments/services-policies-for-government/information-management- technology/records-management/pdfs/arcs_orcs_user_guide.pdf • ARCS: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/information- management-technology/records-management/information-schedules/arcs • ORCS: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/information- management-technology/records-management/information-schedules/orcs • Information Schedules: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for- government/information-management-technology/records-management/information-schedules • A Guide to Legislation and the Legislative Process in British Columbia – Part 1: The Legislative Process: https://www.crownpub.bc.ca/Content/documents/1-LegislativeProcess_August2013.pdf • Hiring Documentation (BC Public Service Agency): https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/careers- myhr/hiring-managers/process/documentation • Records Management and the FOIPPA (BC Bid): https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/services-for-government/bc-bid- resources/reference-resources/records-management • Contract Documentation Checklist (BC Bid): https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/government/services-for-government-and-broader-public- sector/buy-goods-services-and-construction/how-to-buy- services/contract_documentation_checklist.docx