20250115 ‐ calculator & begin invoke - cywongg/2025 GitHub Wiki
This discrepancy arises because of how BeginInvoke
and Invoke
are implemented in WPF's Dispatcher
class, specifically their method overloads and how they handle arguments. Let me explain why this happens and why BeginInvoke
might ask you to explicitly wrap your lambda with a delegate
constructor like new Action(...)
.
The BeginInvoke
method has multiple overloads, and the argument you are passing determines how the method resolves the appropriate overload. The issue you're seeing typically occurs because:
-
BeginInvoke
Has Multiple Overloads: TheDispatcher.BeginInvoke
method has multiple overloads, including:-
Overload 1:
BeginInvoke(Delegate method, params object[] args)
-
Overload 2:
BeginInvoke(Action callback)
-
Overload 3:
BeginInvoke(DispatcherPriority priority, Delegate method, params object[] args)
- And more...
When you pass a lambda expression like
() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)
toBeginInvoke
, the compiler tries to match it to one of these overloads. If it can't unambiguously resolve the lambda expression to one of the overloads, it may require an explicit delegate type (e.g.,Action
). -
Overload 1:
-
Ambiguity Between Overloads: A lambda expression like
() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)
is implicitly convertible to a delegate type (e.g.,Action
), butBeginInvoke
may interpret it as matching the more genericDelegate method
parameter. The genericDelegate
overload often requires explicit wrapping with a delegate type (likenew Action(...)
) because the compiler doesn't automatically infer it.In contrast,
Invoke
has fewer overloads, and one of its primary overloads is highly specific:Invoke(Action callback)
This makes it easier for the compiler to match the lambda expression directly to the
Action
delegate without requiring an explicit constructor.
When using Invoke
, the compiler can unambiguously infer the delegate type from its simpler overloads. For example:
App.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi));
Here, the lambda expression () => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)
directly matches the Invoke(Action callback)
overload. There's no ambiguity, so the compiler doesn't require wrapping it with new Action(...)
.
If BeginInvoke
asks you to explicitly wrap the lambda in new Action(...)
, it's because the lambda is being matched to a more generic Delegate
overload. To resolve this issue, you can explicitly specify the delegate type to help the compiler.
-
Explicitly Wrap with
new Action
:App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(new Action(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)));
-
Use an Explicit Method: Instead of a lambda, point to a named method that matches the
Action
delegate:App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(AddToPdis); private void AddToPdis() { Pdis.Add(mappedPdi); }
-
Specify the Overload Explicitly: Use the overload with
DispatcherPriority
to avoid ambiguity:App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(DispatcherPriority.Normal, new Action(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)));
-
Use
Task
for Simpler Syntax: If you're usingBeginInvoke
for asynchronous execution, consider usingTask
instead, which avoids these overload issues:Task.Run(() => App.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)));
The difference in behavior is due to the way WPF's Dispatcher
resolves overloads for Invoke
and BeginInvoke
:
-
Invoke
: The lambda expression matches theAction
delegate overload directly, so no explicit wrapping is needed. -
BeginInvoke
: The lambda expression may match the genericDelegate
overload instead of theAction
overload, causing ambiguity. Explicitly wrapping the lambda innew Action(...)
resolves this ambiguity.
You don't need to wrap the lambda in new Action(...)
for Invoke
because its overloads are simpler and more specific, allowing the compiler to directly infer the Action
delegate. For BeginInvoke
, however, the overload resolution can be ambiguous due to its more generic overloads, which is why you may need to explicitly specify the delegate type using new Action(...)
.
If you want to avoid wrapping in new Action(...)
, you can:
- Use an explicit method instead of a lambda, or
- Use the
DispatcherPriority
overload to guide the compiler.
The issue you're facing is not about the syntax of the BeginInvoke
method itself, but rather about how you are passing the delegate to it. The argument you pass to BeginInvoke
needs to be a delegate or a lambda expression that matches the expected signature. Based on your example:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi));
This code is syntactically correct because BeginInvoke
accepts a delegate (Action
) as its argument, and () => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)
is a valid lambda expression that matches the Action
delegate type.
However, the runtime issue you're facing might occur for other reasons, such as:
-
Thread Safety: If
Pdis
is not thread-safe or is being accessed by multiple threads simultaneously, it could cause runtime errors. -
Dispatcher Context: If the
Dispatcher
is not initialized or belongs to a thread that's no longer running (e.g., the application is shutting down), callingBeginInvoke
will result in an error. -
Null References: If
Pdis
ormappedPdi
isnull
, it will cause a runtime exception whenPdis.Add(mappedPdi)
is executed.
Let’s break this down and focus specifically on what arguments you need to pass to BeginInvoke
and how to ensure it works correctly.
BeginInvoke
expects an Action
delegate (or other delegates, depending on the overload). The most common usage is:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(Action callback);
The Action
delegate has no parameters and no return value, so you need to pass something like this:
-
Lambda Expression:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi));
-
Named Method:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(AddToPdis); private void AddToPdis() { Pdis.Add(mappedPdi); }
If
mappedPdi
is not a field or property, you'll need to store it in a variable that the method can access. -
Anonymous Method:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(delegate { Pdis.Add(mappedPdi); });
These all produce the same result: passing a delegate to BeginInvoke
.
While the syntax is correct, runtime issues may occur for the reasons mentioned earlier. Here’s how to ensure it works as expected:
Before calling BeginInvoke
, ensure that App.Current.Dispatcher
is not null
:
if (App.Current?.Dispatcher != null)
{
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi));
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Dispatcher is not available.");
}
Check if mappedPdi
is valid before accessing it:
if (mappedPdi != null)
{
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi));
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("mappedPdi is null.");
}
If Pdis
is a collection, ensure it’s thread-safe. For example, switch to a thread-safe collection like ConcurrentBag
or lock the collection when modifying it.
private readonly object _pdisLock = new object();
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
lock (_pdisLock)
{
Pdis.Add(mappedPdi);
}
});
Wrap the code inside the BeginInvoke
delegate in a try-catch block to catch runtime exceptions.
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
try
{
Pdis.Add(mappedPdi);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Error adding to Pdis: {ex.Message}");
}
});
You can optionally specify the priority of the operation using an overload of BeginInvoke
. For example:
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(DispatcherPriority.Normal, new Action(() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)));
Here’s a full example that incorporates these checks and ensures BeginInvoke
is used correctly:
public void AddMappedPdiSafely(object mappedPdi)
{
// Ensure the dispatcher is available
if (App.Current?.Dispatcher != null)
{
App.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
try
{
// Ensure mappedPdi is not null
if (mappedPdi == null)
{
Console.WriteLine("mappedPdi is null.");
return;
}
// Lock Pdis if needed to ensure thread safety
lock (Pdis)
{
Pdis.Add(mappedPdi);
}
Console.WriteLine("Successfully added to Pdis.");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Log or handle the exception
Console.WriteLine($"Error adding to Pdis: {ex.Message}");
}
});
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("Dispatcher is not available.");
}
}
- The argument you pass to
BeginInvoke
is a delegate or a lambda expression. In your case, the syntax() => Pdis.Add(mappedPdi)
is correct. - The issue lies elsewhere (e.g., null references, thread safety, or dispatcher availability).
- Ensure
App.Current.Dispatcher
is valid,Pdis
is thread-safe, andmappedPdi
is not null. - Use exception handling and logging to debug runtime issues.
If Invoke
works but BeginInvoke
doesn’t, it's likely due to a timing issue or race condition, as BeginInvoke
executes asynchronously.
Here’s a cleaned-up, robust, and more readable version of your C# code, leveraging modern C# features and principles of clean code. Additionally, I'll explain the difference between Invoke
and BeginInvoke
at the end.
using System;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
public class RestrikingCheck
{
private static readonly ElasticLogger Elastic = new ElasticLogger();
private static readonly FbConnection FbConnection = new FbConnection();
public void PerformRestrikingCheckForInstruments(IEnumerable<Instrument> instruments)
{
var watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
Elastic.AddLog("Start requesting restriking check");
// Fetch all basketInstrumentIds and issueDates
var basketInstrumentIds = instruments.Select(instrument => instrument.BasketInstrumentID).ToList();
var issueDateByBasket = instruments.ToDictionary(
instrument => instrument.BasketInstrumentID,
instrument => instrument.IssueDate
);
// Retrieve factor data sets
var factorDataSets = FbConnection.GetHistoryForBITD(
basketInstrumentIds,
issueDateByBasket,
loadFullHistory: false,
dateFilter: DateTime.Today.AddDays(-5)
).Item2;
// Group factorDataSets by basketInstrumentId
var factorDataSetsByBasketInstrumentId = factorDataSets
.GroupBy(factor => factor.BasketInstrumentId)
.ToDictionary(group => group.Key, group => group.ToList());
// Perform parallel processing for restriking check
Parallel.ForEach(instruments, instrument =>
{
if (factorDataSetsByBasketInstrumentId.TryGetValue(instrument.BasketInstrumentID, out var requiredFactorDataSet))
{
PerformRestrikingCheck(instrument, requiredFactorDataSet);
}
else
{
Elastic.AddLog($"No factor data found for BasketInstrumentID: {instrument.BasketInstrumentID}");
}
});
watch.Stop();
Elastic.AddLog($"Finish requesting restriking check in {watch.ElapsedMilliseconds} ms");
}
private void PerformRestrikingCheck(Instrument instrument, List<FactorDataSet> factorDataSet)
{
// Placeholder for the actual restriking logic
Elastic.AddLog($"Performing restriking check for Instrument ID: {instrument.Id}");
}
}
// Supporting Classes (placeholders for actual implementations)
public class ElasticLogger
{
public void AddLog(string message) => Console.WriteLine(message);
}
public class FbConnection
{
public Tuple<ICollection<object>, ObservableCollection<FactorDataSet>> GetHistoryForBITD(
List<int> basketInstrumentIds,
Dictionary<int, DateTime> issueDateByBasket,
bool loadFullHistory,
DateTime dateFilter
)
{
// Placeholder for actual database call
return new Tuple<ICollection<object>, ObservableCollection<FactorDataSet>>(null, new ObservableCollection<FactorDataSet>());
}
}
public class Instrument
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int BasketInstrumentID { get; set; }
public DateTime IssueDate { get; set; }
}
public class FactorDataSet
{
public int BasketInstrumentId { get; set; }
}
-
Naming Conventions:
- Used
PascalCase
for method names and property names (PerformRestrikingCheck
,BasketInstrumentID
, etc.). - Added meaningful names for methods (
PerformRestrikingCheckForInstruments
) to improve readability.
- Used
-
Comments:
- Replaced ambiguous TODO comments with functional and understandable in-code documentation.
-
Use of Modern Features:
- Leveraged
Parallel.ForEach
for processing instruments in parallel. - Used
TryGetValue
to safely access dictionary values without risking exceptions.
- Leveraged
-
Error Handling:
- Added a log message when no factor data is found for a given
BasketInstrumentID
.
- Added a log message when no factor data is found for a given
-
Separation of Concerns:
- Extracted the
PerformRestrikingCheck
logic into a separate method to improve readability and testability.
- Extracted the
-
Avoided Redundant Calls:
- Grouped and fetched data upfront (
factorDataSetsByBasketInstrumentId
) to avoid redundant or repeated operations.
- Grouped and fetched data upfront (
-
Readability:
- Consistent formatting, indentation, and spacing make the code easier to understand.
Invoke
and BeginInvoke
are used to execute a delegate on the thread that created a specific Dispatcher
(often the UI thread in WPF).
-
Invoke
:- Synchronous: Executes the delegate on the dispatcher thread and waits for the operation to complete before continuing execution.
- Blocks the calling thread until the operation finishes.
- Use when you need the result of the operation immediately or when further execution depends on it.
Application.Current.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => { // Code to execute on the UI thread });
-
BeginInvoke
:- Asynchronous: Executes the delegate on the dispatcher thread but does not wait for the operation to complete.
- Returns immediately, allowing the calling thread to continue execution.
- Use when you don’t need to wait for the completion of the operation.
Application.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() => { // Code to execute on the UI thread });
-
Invoke
blocks the calling thread, whileBeginInvoke
does not. - Use
BeginInvoke
for better responsiveness in UI applications where blocking the thread would degrade user experience. UseInvoke
when you need the result or need to ensure the operation is completed before moving forward.
Yes, you can extend the FactorDataSet
class to create a new class AsiaFactorDataSet
with an additional field basketInstrumentId
and a related function. This approach uses inheritance to reuse the functionality of the parent class while adding new features.
Here's an example of how you can do it in C#:
// Base class
public class FactorDataSet
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
// Constructor for the base class
public FactorDataSet(int id, string name)
{
Id = id;
Name = name;
}
// Example method in the base class
public virtual void DisplayInfo()
{
Console.WriteLine($"Id: {Id}, Name: {Name}");
}
}
// Derived class
public class AsiaFactorDataSet : FactorDataSet
{
public string BasketInstrumentId { get; set; }
// Constructor for the derived class
public AsiaFactorDataSet(int id, string name, string basketInstrumentId)
: base(id, name) // Calls the base class constructor
{
BasketInstrumentId = basketInstrumentId;
}
// New method related to BasketInstrumentId
public void DisplayBasketInfo()
{
Console.WriteLine($"Basket Instrument Id: {BasketInstrumentId}");
}
// Optionally override the base class method
public override void DisplayInfo()
{
base.DisplayInfo(); // Call the base class method
Console.WriteLine($"Basket Instrument Id: {BasketInstrumentId}");
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
AsiaFactorDataSet asiaFactorDataSet = new AsiaFactorDataSet(1, "Asia Factor", "B123");
// Accessing the base class method
asiaFactorDataSet.DisplayInfo();
// Accessing the new method specific to the derived class
asiaFactorDataSet.DisplayBasketInfo();
}
}
-
Base Class (
FactorDataSet
):- Contains common fields and methods.
- Has a constructor to initialize the base properties.
-
Derived Class (
AsiaFactorDataSet
):- Inherits all fields and methods from the base class.
- Adds a new field
basketInstrumentId
. - Implements a new method
DisplayBasketInfo
specific to this class. - Optionally overrides the base class's behavior with the
override
keyword.
In C#, you can use the Stopwatch
class from the System.Diagnostics
namespace to measure the time it takes to perform a certain operation. Here's how you can implement it:
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
// Create an instance of the calculator
OperationTimer calculator = new OperationTimer();
// Measure the time taken for a sample operation
calculator.MeasureExecutionTime(() =>
{
// Sample operation: Simulate a long-running task
for (int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) { }
});
}
}
public class OperationTimer
{
public void MeasureExecutionTime(Action operation)
{
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
// Start the stopwatch
stopwatch.Start();
// Perform the operation
operation();
// Stop the stopwatch
stopwatch.Stop();
// Calculate time in minutes
double elapsedMinutes = stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalMinutes;
// Display the result
Console.WriteLine($"Operation took {elapsedMinutes:F2} minutes ({stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalSeconds:F2} seconds).");
}
}
-
Stopwatch
:- Used to measure elapsed time.
- Provides properties like
Elapsed.TotalMinutes
andElapsed.TotalSeconds
.
-
Action
Delegate:- Allows you to pass any operation as a parameter (e.g., a lambda function or a method).
-
MeasureExecutionTime Method:
- Starts the stopwatch, executes the operation, and stops the stopwatch.
- Converts the elapsed time to minutes and seconds for display.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
OperationTimer calculator = new OperationTimer();
// Measure a simulated operation
calculator.MeasureExecutionTime(() =>
{
// Simulate a 2-second task
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(2000);
});
}
This program will display something like:
Operation took 0.03 minutes (2.00 seconds).