Project Review and Classification Checklist

Legal

• Is there CSRO on file for all contributors?
• Is there a DOO on file for the project?
• Is everything under one license?
• What is the license?

Project Activity and Management

• Is there a channel for reporting bugs?
• Does the PM appear responsive to bug reports?
• Does the project have a static Web page?
• Is the static Web page or the Wiki maintained with relevant project information?
• Is the project active?

Code and Documentation

• Is the project SVN repository set up and maintained according to best practices?
• If there stable versions and releases, does the project have the proper externals (releases point to releases, etc)?
• Are there README/LICENSE/AUTHORS/INSTALL files?
• Are the files in the proper location?
• Does the INSTALL file give proper instructions for installation?
• Does the code build properly on the platforms it claims to support (Level 2 and above)?
• Is there reasonable documentation (Level 3 and above)?
• Is there a unit test (Level 4 and above)?
• If there is a unit test, does it properly report success or failure (Level 4 and above)?
• Does the project have a binary distribution (Level 5)?
• Does the project have a projDesc.xml file?

Classification

• What should be the classification of this project (Level 1-5)?
• Does the PM agree with this classification?
• Should the project be made inactive?