citation - chunhualiao/public-docs GitHub Wiki
Are there model control protocol servers to find papers for a topic and respond with bitext entries?
VS Code has some extensions to manage bibtex entries and databases!!
| Feature | Using biblatex (\usepackage{biblatex}) |
Not Using biblatex (Traditional BibTeX) |
Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processing Backend | Primarily uses biber. |
Primarily uses bibtex. |
biber is a more modern, flexible, and Unicode-aware backend processor for bibliography data. |
| Syntax in Preamble | Uses \usepackage{biblatex} with various options (e.g., style=, backend=). |
No \usepackage for basic functionality; style set in body with \bibliographystyle{...} (or use natbib for enhanced citation commands). |
biblatex is loaded as a package in the preamble, allowing configuration options upfront. |
| Syntax for List | Uses \printbibliography where the list should appear. |
Uses \bibliography{your_bib_file} where the list should appear. |
Different commands are used to generate the bibliography list. |
| Citation Commands | Uses \cite{key}, but with many enhanced variations (e.g., \autocite, \parencite, \textcite) often configured via package options. |
Uses \cite{key}, basic commands. natbib package is commonly used to provide author-year (\citet) and parenthetical (\citep) commands. |
biblatex offers more semantic and configurable citation commands natively. |
| Style Files | Uses .bbx (bibliography styles) and .cbx (citation styles). |
Uses .bst (BibTeX style) files. |
biblatex separates bibliography and citation formatting, making customization easier. .bst files are harder to create/modify. |
| Flexibility & Styles | Highly flexible. Wide range of built-in styles. Easy to customize or create new styles. | Limited built-in styles. Customization of .bst files is complex. |
biblatex is designed for modern needs and diverse style requirements. |
| Entry Types & Fields | Supports a rich set of standard entry types and fields (e.g., url, doi, eprint, date handling is robust). |
More limited standard fields. Support for modern fields like URL/DOI is style-dependent or requires workarounds. | biblatex natively understands many fields commonly used today. |
| Multiple Bibliographies | Relatively straightforward to create multiple bibliographies (e.g., by chapter, by category). | More complex, often requires external tools or tricky workarounds. | biblatex has built-in support for splitting or filtering bibliographies. |
| Localization/Multilingual | Excellent support, integrates well with babel/polyglossia, handles localized terms correctly. |
Limited or no built-in support; requires specialized .bst files for localization. |
biblatex is designed with internationalization in mind. |
| Handling Complex Data | Better handling of names (e.g., von/de prefixes), Unicode characters (with biber), and annotations. |
Can struggle with complex names or non-ASCII characters without specific .bst files or pre-processing. |
biber's design improves handling of complex bibliographic data. |