question answering of codebases>

Open-Source Solutions for C++ Codebase Question Answering with LLMs and RAG

Developers often grapple with understanding and navigating large-scale codebases. This challenge is compounded by factors like time constraints, insufficient documentation, and the inherent complexity of software projects1. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising solution, and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques further enhance their capabilities by grounding responses in relevant external knowledge. This article delves into the best open-source solutions for answering questions about a large-scale C++ codebase using LLMs and RAG, examining standardized benchmarks and leaderboards for this task.

Research Methodology

To gather the information presented in this article, a comprehensive research process was undertaken, involving the following steps:

1. Identify Open-Source Solutions: We explored open-source solutions for codebase question answering, specifically those utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) and RAG techniques.
2. Gather Research Papers and Articles: We collected research papers and articles discussing the application of LLMs and RAG to codebase question answering, with a focus on C++.
3. Identify Benchmarks and Leaderboards: We identified standardized benchmarks and leaderboards used for evaluating codebase question answering systems, particularly those relevant to C++.
4. Find Tools and Libraries: We compiled a list of open-source tools and libraries that can be used to build a codebase question answering system.
5. Identify Pre-trained LLMs: We researched pre-trained LLMs suitable for codebase question answering.
6. Find Relevant Datasets: We searched for open-source datasets of C++ code and corresponding questions and answers that can be used for training and evaluation.

Open-Source Frameworks for Codebase Question Answering

Several open-source frameworks provide the foundation for building a robust codebase question answering system. These frameworks offer benefits such as ensuring access to the most current and reliable facts and providing users with access to the model's sources for verification2. Here are some of the most promising options:

• Langchain: This framework simplifies building LLM-powered applications through composability. It offers a modular approach to chain together different components, such as prompt templates, LLMs, and retrieval mechanisms, making it ideal for RAG-based systems3.
• Llama Index: Formerly known as GPT Index, Llama Index is a data framework specifically designed for LLM applications. It provides tools for structuring, indexing, and querying your data, enabling efficient retrieval of relevant information for codebase question answering3.
• GraphRAG: This framework utilizes a graph-based approach to RAG. By representing code as a graph, GraphRAG can capture relationships between different code entities, leading to more accurate and context-aware answers3.
• Embedchain: Embedchain is an open-source RAG framework that focuses on ease of use and deployment. It provides a simple API for creating and deploying AI applications, including codebase question answering systems3.
• DB-GPT: This framework aims to revolutionize database interactions using private LLM technology. It allows you to connect an LLM to your database, enabling natural language querying of your codebase3.

Open-Source Tools and Libraries

In addition to frameworks, several open-source tools and libraries can be valuable for building a codebase question answering system. These tools can be categorized based on their functionality:

Code Assistants:

• Cody: An AI code assistant that leverages advanced search and codebase context to help you write and fix code. It can be adapted for question answering by integrating it with an LLM and a retrieval mechanism3.
• Adrenaline: This tool provides instant answers to programming questions. It can be used as a component in a larger codebase question answering system3.

Repository Exploration Tools:

• Repo-chat: This tool allows you to use AI to ask questions about any GitHub repository. It can be integrated with your C++ codebase to provide a conversational interface for querying code3.

Privacy-focused Tools:

• PrivateGPT: This tool allows you to interact with your documents using the power of GPT, with a focus on privacy. It can be adapted for codebase question answering by using your codebase as the document source3.
• LocalGPT: Similar to PrivateGPT, LocalGPT enables you to chat with your documents on your local device using GPT models, ensuring data privacy3.

Database Interfaces:

• Vanna: This tool allows you to chat with your SQL database using natural language. If your C++ codebase is stored in a SQL database, Vanna can be used to query it conversationally3.

Embedding Databases and Codebase Analysis:

• txtai: An all-in-one open-source embeddings database for semantic search, LLM orchestration, and language model workflows. It can be used to store and query code embeddings for efficient retrieval3.
• Codebase-digest: This command-line tool helps you analyze and understand your codebase. It generates structured overviews with metrics and provides a library of LLM prompts for in-depth codebase analysis4.

Chatbot Frameworks:

• Botpress: An open-source conversational AI platform that supports various NLU libraries. It allows developers to build chatbots using visual flows and small amounts of training data5.
• Microsoft Bot Framework: A comprehensive platform for building bots, offering tools and SDKs for developers. It can be integrated with various NLU engines and supports multiple programming languages5.
• Botkit: Now part of the Microsoft Bot Framework, Botkit provides a code-centric approach to building chatbots. It offers a visual conversation builder and integrates with various chat platforms5.

General Purpose Libraries:

• EF Core: A modern object-database mapper for .NET6.
• Wasp: An open-source configuration language for building web applications6.
• Fluvio: A cloud-native, edge-ready, stateful, and composable unified data streaming platform powered by Rust and WebAssembly6.

These tools provide a rich ecosystem for developing and deploying codebase question answering systems.

Pre-trained LLMs for Codebase Question Answering

Choosing the right pre-trained LLM is crucial for effective codebase question answering. Here are some popular options, including open-source question answering models like Hugging Face Transformers, AllenNLP, and BERT: 7

• Llama 2: This model from Meta boasts a vast model size and has been trained on a massive dataset, making it suitable for various tasks, including code understanding and generation8.
• Falcon: This model stands out for its performance on the Hugging Face Leaderboard for pre-trained Open Large Language Models. Its focus on web data may be beneficial for understanding code documentation and comments8.
• Bloom: This open-access multilingual language model offers strong performance in code-related tasks and can be fine-tuned for specific codebases8.
• MPT: This model is designed for efficient inference and can be fine-tuned for codebase question answering with limited resources8.
• Vicuna: This model is known for its strong performance in conversational tasks and can be adapted for interactive codebase question answering8.
• Mistral 7B: This open-source model outperforms Llama 2 and CodeLlama on most benchmarks, making it a strong contender for codebase question answering9.
• Hugging Face Transformers: A library offering a diverse array of pre-trained models for various natural language processing tasks, including question answering7.
• AllenNLP: An open-source library for natural language processing research, providing a framework for designing and evaluating deep learning models for question answering7.
• BERT: A powerful language model from Google that excels in understanding and responding to questions7.

Standardized Benchmarks and Leaderboards

Evaluating the performance of codebase question answering systems is essential. Here are some standardized benchmarks and leaderboards, including general text-based benchmark datasets: 10

Code-Specific Benchmarks:

• HumanEval: This benchmark measures the functional correctness of code generation from docstrings. It consists of 164 Python programming problems and is widely used to evaluate code LLMs11.
• MBPP: The Mostly Basic Programming Problems (MBPP) dataset contains 974 programming tasks designed for entry-level programmers. It measures the ability of LLMs to synthesize short Python programs from natural language descriptions11.
• MultiPL-E: This benchmark extends HumanEval and MBPP to 18 programming languages, allowing for cross-lingual evaluation of code generation capabilities12.
• Big Code Models Leaderboard: This leaderboard on Hugging Face compares the performance of base multilingual code generation models on HumanEval and MultiPL-E. It also measures throughput to compare inference speed13.
• StackEval: This benchmark comprises curated Stack Overflow questions covering 25 programming languages and four task types: debugging, implementation, optimization, and conceptual understanding14.

General-Purpose Benchmarks:

• ACLUE: An evaluation benchmark for ancient Chinese language comprehension10.
• African Languages LLM Eval Leaderboard: Tracks progress and ranks the performance of LLMs on African languages10.
• AgentBoard: A benchmark for multi-turn LLM agents, with an analytical evaluation board for detailed model assessment10.

Open-Source Datasets for General Question Answering

Several open-source datasets are available for general question answering, which can be valuable for training and evaluating the underlying LLMs used in codebase question answering systems:

• MCTEST: A set of stories and associated multiple-choice reading comprehension questions15.
• WikiQA: A dataset for open-domain question answering, sourced from Bing query logs15.
• SQuAD: A large-scale reading comprehension dataset consisting of questions posed on Wikipedia articles15.

Open-Source Datasets for Codebase Question Answering

While finding datasets specifically for C++ codebase question answering can be challenging, some options exist:

• CodeQA: This dataset contains Java and Python code with corresponding question-answer pairs. It can be valuable for training and evaluating codebase question answering systems, and its construction process, which involves transforming code comments into question-answer pairs, offers insights into dataset creation16.

Challenges in Evaluating RAG for Codebase Question Answering

Evaluating RAG systems for large-scale codebases presents unique challenges. One key difficulty lies in verifying the factual accuracy of answers generated by the system18. Unlike general question answering, where answers can often be verified against readily available knowledge sources, codebase question answering often deals with domain-specific logic and intricate code interactions. This necessitates specialized datasets with ground truth context, where domain experts have identified the specific code snippets required to answer a question correctly18. This highlights a crucial need for collaboration between AI researchers and domain experts in building effective evaluation frameworks.

Key Capabilities of RAG for Codebase Question Answering

RAG systems exhibit several key capabilities that enhance codebase question answering:

• Noise Robustness: The ability to handle noisy or irrelevant information in the retrieved documents19.
• Knowledge Gap Detection: The ability to recognize and handle situations where the retrieved information is insufficient to answer the question19.
• External Truth Integration: The ability to integrate external data that may contradict or supplement the information already present in the LLM's knowledge base19.

These capabilities contribute to the robustness and reliability of RAG-based codebase question answering systems.

Real-world Examples of Codebase Question Answering with LLMs and RAG

A practical example of LLMs and RAG in action is the "ground crew" product, which uses these technologies to understand and interact with a codebase20. This product aims to improve code maintenance, knowledge management, engineering onboarding, documentation, and identify potential code issues. By allowing developers to ask natural language questions about the code, "ground crew" provides quick access to relevant information and explanations, reducing the need to search through documentation or consult other developers. This example demonstrates the tangible benefits of applying LLMs and RAG to real-world software development challenges.

Interactive Codebase Question Answering with LLMs

Effective codebase question answering often involves an interactive process. LLMs can benefit from maintaining conversation history and allowing for iterative interactions with the user21. This enables the system to handle more complex questions that require clarification or refinement. For example, a user might start with a general question and then progressively narrow down their query based on the system's responses. This dynamic interaction allows for a more natural and efficient exploration of the codebase.

Advanced RAG Techniques for Codebase Question Answering

Cascaded Retrieval RAG (CGRAG) is an advanced technique that can further improve the performance of codebase question answering systems22. This approach involves an initial retrieval step based on the user's query, followed by an analysis of the retrieved results by the LLM. The LLM then identifies additional relevant concepts or areas of the codebase, leading to a second retrieval step. This cascaded approach can uncover non-obvious connections and provide a richer context for the LLM to generate more accurate and comprehensive answers.

Building a C++ Codebase Question Answering System

Building a successful codebase question answering system requires careful consideration of several factors:

• Data Preparation: The C++ codebase needs to be preprocessed and potentially transformed into a format suitable for the chosen LLM and retrieval mechanism23. This may involve parsing code, extracting relevant information, and creating embeddings. Additionally, ensuring the code is clear, human-readable, and well-commented can significantly improve the system's ability to understand and answer questions about the code24.
• Retrieval Strategy: Selecting an appropriate retrieval strategy is crucial for finding relevant code snippets. Options include keyword-based search, semantic search using embeddings, and graph-based retrieval.
• LLM Fine-tuning: Fine-tuning a pre-trained LLM on the C++ codebase can improve its understanding of the code and its ability to generate accurate answers25. This process can lead to more comprehensive knowledge and better code generation, but requires careful data preparation and ongoing maintenance to keep the model up-to-date with codebase changes22. It's also important to consider incorporating tool use with code LLMs, such as calculators and interpreters, to improve performance in tasks like arithmetic21.
• Evaluation: Evaluating the system's performance on relevant benchmarks and through user studies is essential to ensure its effectiveness.

LLM Training Frameworks

For those interested in training their own LLMs for codebase question answering, several open-source frameworks are available:

• Meta Lingua: A lean and efficient codebase for LLM research26.
• Litgpt: Provides recipes for pretraining, fine-tuning, and deploying LLMs at scale26.
• nanotron: A minimalistic framework for large language model training with 3D parallelism26.

Key Research Papers in LLMs and Codebase Question Answering

Several research papers have laid the foundation for the current advancements in LLMs and codebase question answering. Some notable examples include:

• Attention Is All You Need: This paper introduced the transformer architecture, which has become the backbone of many modern LLMs26.
• BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding: This paper introduced BERT, a powerful language model that has achieved state-of-the-art results in various NLP tasks26.

These papers provide valuable insights into the development and application of LLMs for code understanding and question answering.

Conclusion

Open-source solutions offer a powerful and flexible approach to building C++ codebase question answering systems. By combining LLMs with RAG techniques and leveraging standardized benchmarks, developers can create systems that significantly improve code comprehension, maintenance, and knowledge sharing.

To build an effective C++ codebase question answering system, it's crucial to:

• Select an appropriate framework: Consider frameworks like Langchain or Llama Index for their modularity and ease of use.
• Choose the right tools: Utilize tools like Cody or Adrenaline for code assistance, and Vanna or txtai for database interaction and embedding management.
• Select a pre-trained LLM: Evaluate LLMs like Llama 2, Falcon, or Mistral 7B based on their performance and suitability for code-related tasks.
• Prepare the codebase: Preprocess the C++ code, ensuring clarity and readability, and potentially transform it into a suitable format for the LLM and retrieval mechanism.
• Choose a retrieval strategy: Implement an effective retrieval strategy, such as keyword-based search, semantic search, or graph-based retrieval.
• Fine-tune the LLM: Consider fine-tuning the LLM on the C++ codebase to improve its understanding and performance.
• Evaluate the system: Use standardized benchmarks and user studies to assess the system's effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

As the field of LLMs continues to evolve, we can expect even more sophisticated and effective solutions for interacting with large-scale codebases. One potential future application is using LLMs and RAG to verify alignment between research papers and code implementations, ensuring consistency and accuracy in software development27. This highlights the broader potential of codebase question answering systems to contribute to the advancement of software engineering practices.

Works cited

1. Using LLMs to aid developers with code comprehension in codebases - University of Twente Student Theses, accessed February 18, 2025, https://essay.utwente.nl/103120/1/Reefman_MA_EEMCS.pdf
2. Understanding And Querying Code: A RAG powered approach - AI Planet, accessed February 18, 2025, https://medium.aiplanet.com/understanding-and-querying-code-a-rag-powered-approach-b85cf6f30d11
3. Jenqyang/LLM-Powered-RAG-System - GitHub, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/Jenqyang/LLM-Powered-RAG-System
4. kamilstanuch/codebase-digest: 🗜️ Codebase-digest is your AI-friendly codebase packer and analyzer. Features 60+ coding prompts and generates structured overviews with metrics. Ideal for feeding projects to LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, PaLM, and Gemini for code analysis and understanding. - GitHub, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/kamilstanuch/codebase-digest
5. 13 Best Open Source Chatbot Platforms to Use in 2025 - Botpress, accessed February 18, 2025, https://botpress.com/blog/open-source-chatbots
6. gitroomhq/awesome-opensource: Best open-source GitHub libraries voted by members, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/gitroomhq/awesome-opensource
7. Top Free Q&A tools, APIs, and Open Source models - Eden AI, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.edenai.co/post/top-free-q-a-tools-apis-and-open-source-models
8. Top 5 open-source LLMs that can be used for question answering over private data | by Mostafa Ibrahim | Avkalan.ai | Medium, accessed February 18, 2025, https://medium.com/avkalan-ai/top-5-open-source-llms-that-can-be-used-for-question-answering-over-private-data-c4f1326cd1e6
9. On Improving Repository-Level Code QA for Large Language Models - ACL Anthology, accessed February 18, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-srw.28.pdf
10. SAILResearch/awesome-foundation-model-leaderboards - GitHub, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/SAILResearch/awesome-foundation-model-leaderboards
11. An introduction to code LLM benchmarks for software engineers - Continue Blog, accessed February 18, 2025, https://blog.continue.dev/an-introduction-to-code-llm-benchmarks-for-software-engineers/
12. What leaderboard do you trust for ranking LLMs in coding tasks? - Reddit, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1gve7zs/what_leaderboard_do_you_trust_for_ranking_llms_in/
13. Big Code Models Leaderboard - a Hugging Face Space by bigcode, accessed February 18, 2025, https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-models-leaderboard
14. StackEval: Benchmarking LLMs in Coding Assistance - NeurIPS 2024, accessed February 18, 2025, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/4126a607bbe2836cb6ca0eb45b75618b-Paper-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.pdf
15. RenzeLou/Datasets-for-Question-Answering: Will be updated continuously. - GitHub, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/RenzeLou/Datasets-for-Question-Answering
16. CodeQA Dataset - Papers With Code, accessed February 18, 2025, https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/codeqa
17. CodeQA: A Question Answering Dataset for Source Code Comprehension - ACL Anthology, accessed February 18, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-emnlp.223/
18. Evaluating RAG for large scale codebases - Qodo, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.qodo.ai/blog/evaluating-rag-for-large-scale-codebases/
19. QA-RAG: Exploring LLM Reliance on External Knowledge - MDPI, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/8/9/115
20. Ep 26. Build an Open Source LLM RAG for Your Code - Ground Crew - YouTube, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zvjul_q7oG0
21. Groundcrew: build an LLM RAG on your code - YouTube, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11dJL5a-jJg
22. From Snippets to Systems: Advanced Techniques for Repository-Aware Coding Assistants | by Colin Baird | Medium, accessed February 18, 2025, https://medium.com/@colinbaird_51123/from-snippets-to-systems-advanced-techniques-for-repository-aware-coding-assistants-cf1a2086ab41
23. RAG based Question-Answering for Contextual Response Prediction System - arXiv, accessed February 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.03708v1
24. C++: Opening Real Datasets from Kaggle - YouTube, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAfwUFeBSM8
25. Large Language Models for Code: Exploring the Landscape, Opportunities, and Challenges, accessed February 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKL2n-Sxu3g
26. Awesome-LLM: a curated list of Large Language Model - GitHub, accessed February 18, 2025, https://github.com/Hannibal046/Awesome-LLM
27. Enhancing Code Consistency in AI Research with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation - arXiv, accessed February 18, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2502.00611v1