Agenda:

https://github.com/biometricITC/cPP-biometrics/wiki/iTC-Meeting-Agenda-2020-11-09

Call started at 10:00 am EST

Attendees

• Brian Wood
• Naruki Kai
• Clare Olin
• Fiona Pattinson
• Jonathan Rolf
• Greg Ott

Record of Decisions

• The Eye, Face and Vein toolboxes are approved for publication.

Action Items

• Brian will publish the Eye, Face, Vein toolboxes
• Brian will update the toolbox repos for public use

Minutes

The call started with a quick review of the Task List. Brian had moved the fingerprint into the toolbox listing for public review. No other updates were made.

The only update to the toolboxes since the start of the last public review period was a change to remove "playdoh" from the vein attacks. This was approved and merged. The group then approved the release of the three toolboxes that have been finished. Brian will handle getting them published by tomorrow.

The group then reviewed the presentations for the CCUF and ICCC. A few updates were made to the ICCC presentation. The current version will be sent out for any further comments prior to the meetings.

The call then shifted to the fingerprint toolbox review. The current pull requests that have been merged were quickly reviewed for everyone before moving on to the still-open issues.

Issue #2 was the first topic. After discussion with Greg, it was decided that a new column would be added to the inventory table that would provide commercial vendors or example products that could meet the requirements. This would also answer Issue #10. Brian will work on adding some language in a PR about how mentions of products are not intended as endorsement or even as a requirement that these be used, but for reference about the types of products which could meet the requirements. Language would also be added about trademarks being theirs.

Issue #3 then took a lot of discussion about whether the photo manipulation that is expected can be considered within the requirements for the vulnerability calculations. The thinking here is that text about keeping everything clean will cover some of the concerns about scratches and dirt, and possibly some language about practice would be sufficient to minimize the need for photo processing that would do more than making the black and white image along with the flip/inversion steps.

Issue #6 was discussed. Greg pointed out that he was trying to create a simple set of tests with well-reproducible results, and that silicone usually worked better in the long term than glue (storage, not drying out, etc). Due to the differences though, it may be worth considering if glue should be used as a species type. This will be discussed further.

The remaining open issues were not discussed at this time.

The next call will be on November 19.

The call ended at 11:05am EST.