iTC Meeting Minutes 2019 12 05 - biometricITC/cPP-biometrics GitHub Wiki

Agenda:

https://github.com/biometricITC/cPP-biometrics/wiki/iTC-Meeting-Agenda-2019-12-05

Call started at 10am EST

Attendees

  • Brian Wood
  • Naruki Kai
  • Albert Martorell
  • Clare Olin
  • Fiona Pattinson

Record of Decisions

  • None on this call

Action Items

  • Brian will make several edits based on issues opened by Clare
  • Naruki will start work on the vein toolbox related to the Attack Potential

Minutes

The call started with a quick review of the task list.

Brian noted that the ESR had been posted to the CC Portal.

The next topic was to review the updates from Naruki related to moving the PAD testing to optional. These were included in PR #190. The changes were looked over during the call and approved for merging.

Following this a quick review of the changes submitted from Brian about moving the MDFPP references out of the PP-Module and into the PP-Config was done. Towards the end of the call, to make sure further edits were handled on the full set of changes from PR #189 and PR #190 these were all merged into Master (and Brian will later merge these back into the develop branch).

Brian then reviewed the changes he had made to the Eye toolbox to add the attack potential calculations. He showed the creation of multiple tables if more than one species was specified in the specific attack description. While there were no specific questions on this, there was a question about whether some of the attack categories need to be covered in the eye (and face, by extension) for use. An issue will be created to discuss this going forward. Brian noted that in the 2 years this had been worked on that several things had changed as far as the expectations of the camera capabilities, so it was worth reopening a discussion about what to cover. (Brian will look to see if there is an old issue to attach to.)

Lastly, Clare had opened several issues prior to the call and these were reviewed.

A new PR was created to house more "grammatical" errors that Clare had noted PR 195. A few quick edits were made on the call, but Clare said she would work on fixing any others she found and add them to this PR.

Clare pointed out that the term artefact was not defined in the PP-Module 196, and that this should be done since that is the master glossary. Brian said he would add this text in a new PR for review.

In 193 there was a question about the location of FIA_UAU.5. Brian explained this is actually how the MDFPP and the PP-Module are linked together, but that this also should have been removed with the change in PR #189 and he would look into making sure it was properly moved to the PP-Configuration.

In 194 Clare pointed out that the working on the application note didn't seem clear as it looked like it was adding a new requirement to the SFR. Brian pointed out that this is actually a clarification to reference A.Alternative. Brian said he would propose updated text for the app note for review.

In the Toolbox, TB 22 had a question about the sentence about using 3 test subjects for the creation of the PAI. A change was made during the call to the sentence in question to clarify the creation of the PAI and the issue was closed.

The last issue TB 23 is about clarification of how the testing is actually performed. This text is somewhat confusing and multiple people on the call were not clear on its meaning. Brian will propose new text for this for review.

The last topic discussed was the goal of completing the edits on the PP-Module/SD/PP-Config/Toolbox Overview by the next call in 2 weeks so the documents can be published for the next public review cycle.

The call ended at 10:55am EST.