Software Development Methodology: Waterfall

Related Documents

• SDM

The Waterfall model is a traditional and linear approach to software development. It follows a sequential order of phases, with each phase serving as the foundation for the next. Unlike iterative methodologies, Waterfall has a structured and inflexible flow.

Phases of the Waterfall Model

1. Requirements:

   • In this initial phase, detailed requirements are gathered and documented.
   • Stakeholders collaborate to define the project scope and establish clear expectations.

2. Design:

   • Based on the gathered requirements, the system architecture and design are created.
   • This phase involves creating high-level and low-level designs, specifying system components and their relationships.

3. Implementation:

   • The actual coding or programming of the software is carried out in this phase.
   • Developers implement the design specifications, converting them into executable code.

4. Testing:

   • The software undergoes rigorous testing to identify and rectify defects.
   • Testing includes unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and user acceptance testing.

5. Deployment:

   • Once testing is successful, the software is deployed to the production environment.
   • Users may start using the software at this stage.

6. Maintenance:

   • The final phase involves ongoing maintenance and support.
   • Updates, enhancements, and bug fixes are addressed as needed.

Advantages of the Waterfall Model

• Clear Structure:

  • The linear structure makes it easy to understand and manage the development process.

• Well-Defined Requirements:

  • Since all requirements are gathered upfront, there is clarity about project scope and objectives.

• Documented Process:

  • Each phase is well-documented, facilitating easier project management and knowledge transfer.

Disadvantages of the Waterfall Model

• Limited Flexibility:

  • The sequential nature makes it challenging to accommodate changes once the project is underway.

• Late Visibility for Stakeholders:

  • Stakeholders may not see the product until late in the development cycle, leading to potential misunderstandings.

• Risk of Project Failure:

  • If requirements are not accurately captured initially, the project may encounter difficulties later in the process.

Conclusion

The Waterfall model is suitable for projects with well-defined and stable requirements. Its structured approach can be effective for small to medium-sized projects where changes are unlikely. However, its lack of flexibility may pose challenges in dynamic and evolving project environments.