/simplify is distinct from /code-review. /code-review hunts for bugs. /simplify hunts for accidental complexity — code that is harder to read, longer, or more indirected than the behavior requires. It applies Chesterton's Fence (understand why code exists before removing it) and the Rule of 500 (long functions and files are signals, not violations) to produce a rationalization table before it changes anything.

1. Invoke the command with a target — or none, to simplify the working-tree diff:

   /simplify                  # uncommitted working-tree diff (git diff HEAD)
   /simplify src/auth.py      # a single file
   /simplify src/             # a directory
   /simplify main...HEAD      # a commit range
   

2. Read the rationalization table. Before touching anything, /simplify produces a table with one row per candidate:

   Location	Candidate	Chesterton check	Rule of 500 signal	Verdict
   file.py:42	3-layer wrapper	Unknown origin	function is 12 lines	investigate
   util.py:88	duplicate helper	Confirmed dead	—	remove

   The Chesterton check column is the key column: if the origin of a piece of code is unknown, the verdict is investigate, not remove.

3. Confirm or reject the proposed changes. /simplify reports; it does not apply changes without your confirmation.

4. After applying, re-run any affected tests to confirm nothing behavioral changed:

   python3 -m pytest          # or your project's test runner

Run /simplify after a feature lands, not before — you need the tests green first so the simplification pass can confirm it didn't change behavior. Typical moments:

• After a sprint of fast feature work that accumulated debt
• After a refactor that left scaffolding behind
• Before opening a PR, to keep the diff reviewable

Do not run /simplify instead of /code-review — run both; they look for different things (see the intro above).

Symptom	Cause	Fix
Candidate marked investigate — you think it's safe to remove	Chesterton check is uncertain	Grep for callers (grep -rn 'function_name' src/); if genuinely dead, remove and confirm
Rule of 500 flags a long file that's intentionally long	Long ≠ wrong; the rule is a signal	Override: mark the finding as intentional in the reconciliation; the command skips it
Simplification breaks a test	Behavioral change slipped through	Revert the specific change; report via a /code-review pass to confirm the invariant

• Review a change for bugs — /code-review for adversarial bug-finding
• In-flight decision review — /doubt for pre-commit decisions
• Why adversarial review — the adversarial framing behind the code-review plugin
• Install crickets plugins — get the code-review plugin onto your host
• Manifest schema — command primitive frontmatter reference