Standards Call 2023-12

Agenda

#735: The current system is indeed not well suited for more complex studies. Should have a look at the way how IEDB describes this kind of information in their database, it is obvious that this is something that people have thought about before, don't need to reinvent things.
#733: Leave the field as it is, i.e. free text with suggested keywords. This is clearly not perfect, but better than having a solution which is more formalized but less flexible.
#730: Discuss again in January, potential strategy for v2.0 might be to complete the Docs first in terms of content and then have a look at a meaningful and consistent structure for the individual sections.
#704: Associated PR #705 looks good in general. Some miniscule clarification in the description of Cell.`reactivity_measurement` is still needed, otherwise this will be put up for a final discussion in the next call.
Happy holidays, see you next year!