Neo4j vs ArangoDB vs OrientDb - adilnumancelik/sonar GitHub Wiki

Neo4j vs ArangoDB vs OrientDb

Criteria\GraphDB Neo4j ArangoDB OrientDb
Description Open source graph database Native multi-model DBMS for graph, document, key/value and search. All in one engine and accessible with one query language. Multi-model DBMS (Document, Graph, Key/Value)
Primary Functionality Graph DBMS Document store, Graph DBMS, Key-value store, Search engine Document store, Graph DBMS, Key-value store
APIs and other access methods Bolt protocol, Cypher query language, Java API, Neo4j-OGM info, RESTful HTTP API, Spring Data Neo4j, TinkerPop 3 AQL, Foxx Framework, Graph API (Gremlin), GraphQL query language, HTTP API, Java & SpringData, JSON style queries, VelocyPack/VelocyStream Tinkerpop technology stack with Blueprints, Gremlin, Pipes, Java API, RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported Programming Languages .Net, Clojure, Elixir, Go, Groovy, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Scala C#, C++, Clojure, Elixir, Go, Java, JavaScript (Node.js), PHP, Python, R, Rust .Net, C, C#, C++, Clojure, Java, JavaScript, JavaScript (Node.js), PHP, Python, Ruby, Scala
Pricing Free version available Free version available Free version available
Pros *Robust graph visualization tools
*Graph edges can store labels
*Less Java infrastructure code needed for implementation than ArangoDB
*Graph edges can also store data values similar to data Nodes
*Intuitive and rich query language
*Grahps and documents in one DB
*SQL-like query language
*Supports Object-Oriented concept of class inheritance
Cons *Can't store a vertex as JSON
*Comparably slow
*One graph per Neo4j instance
*Web ui has still room for improvement
*No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL
*Unstable
*Minimal documentation and Java examples
*Class inheritance can add unneeded complexity

Soruces:

⚠️ **GitHub.com Fallback** ⚠️