CONCEPT SELECTION AND PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE - a-division-2019-20-odd/Repo-01 GitHub Wiki
IDENTIFIED OBJECTIVES
Sl. No. |
Objectives |
1. |
Semi-automatic |
2. |
Safety |
3. |
Easy To Use |
4. |
Portability |
5. |
Cost |
1.Weightage:
Objectives |
Weightage |
Semi-automatic |
9 |
Safety |
8 |
Easy To Use |
6 |
Portability |
4 |
Cost |
5 |
2. Pugh chart
Objectives |
Design Idea 1 |
Design Idea 2 |
Design Idea 3 |
Design Idea 4 |
Semi-automatic |
++ |
++ |
Datum |
- |
Safety |
+ |
-- |
Datum |
++ |
Easy To Use |
-- |
+ |
Datum |
+ |
Portabity |
+ |
- |
Datum |
-- |
Cost |
-- |
++ |
Datum |
+ |
+Score |
30 |
34 |
Datum |
27 |
-Score |
-14 |
-20 |
Datum |
-17 |
Total |
16 |
14 |
Datum |
10 |
3. Justification of Pugh chart
Design Idea No. |
Objective |
Score given |
Justification |
1. |
Semi-automatic |
18 |
The wrapping sheets are manually placed in the machine while the chocolates are dispensed automatically |
|
Safety |
8 |
As the process completes in the machine there is no chance of physical damage |
|
Easy To Use |
-12 |
As the process completes in the machine there is no chance of physical damage |
|
Portability |
4 |
As the size of machine is 2X2 it makes portable for the user |
|
Cost |
-10 |
As there are 3 dipensers and its mechanism it enchances the cost of production increases |
2. |
Semi-automatic |
18 |
It is because chocolates can be easily wrapped after major part is wrapped |
|
Safety |
-16 |
Chances that cutter may hit or damage the fingers while collecting chocolate |
|
Easy To Use |
6 |
Its easy as machine wraps chocolate along the conveyor belt and only the chocolates must be inserted |
|
Portability |
-8 |
The machine is heavy |
|
Cost |
10 |
Its cost-Effective |
3. |
Semi-automatic |
* |
Datum |
|
Safety |
* |
Datum |
|
Easy To Use |
* |
Datum |
|
Portability |
* |
Datum |
|
Cost |
* |
Datum |
4. |
Semi-automatic |
-9 |
The machine is totally automatic as chocolate gets wrapped on its own so cannot be used as semi-automatic |
|
Safety |
16 |
Machine is safe for the operators and don't cause any harmness to the desired product |
|
Easy To Use |
6 |
Conceptual machine is user-friendly, almost easy to use and less training is required to operate |
|
Portability |
-8 |
The machine is very heavy and portability is low |
|
Cost |
5 |
Its cost-Effective |
4.Selected Design
According to the scores given to the conceptual designs in pugh chart, Design 1 is most appropriate for chocolate Wrapping.
5.Clustering of Subfunctions and functions in glass box/Function tree.
6.Identified List of Subsystems
SI.No. |
Subsystem Name |
1 |
Insertion and sensing of the chocolate |
2 |
Chocolate Wrapping |
3 |
Collection of wrapped chocolates |
4 |
Indication of Process completion |
7.System Interactions Details( For above subsystems)
Interaction Details:
1.Material Interaction: Some solid materials and other packing materials flow through one subsystem to another.
2.Energy Interaction:Some of energy interactions are acting between one subsystem and the other.( Electrical energy in the one subsystem is converted into mechanical energy where work is being done)
3.Data Interactions: Signals used between one subsystem to another will help the packing of chocolate in a systematic way. However the signals of one subsystem are linked with each other.
4.Special Interactions: These are physical connections Between one subsystem to another that defines the whole Machine.
8.System Interaction details table(for all the subsystems)
ADDITION OF CHOCOLATES
Interaction |
Adding |
Storing |
Indication |
Energy interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
Data interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
Material interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Spatial interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
WRAPPING OF CHOCOLATES
Interaction |
Adding |
Wrapping |
Indication |
Energy interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Data interaction |
No |
Yes |
No |
Material interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Spatial interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
STORING OF WRAPPED CHOCOLATE
Interaction |
Adding |
Storing |
Indication |
Energy interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Data interaction |
No |
No |
Yes |
Material interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Spatial interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
INDICATION OF PROCESS COMPLETION
Interaction |
Adding |
Storing |
Indication |
Energy interaction |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Data interaction |
Yes |
No |
No |
Material interaction |
No |
No |
Yes |
Spatial interaction |
No |
No |
No |
9. Functional Tree vs Component Hierarchy