Performance Benchmarks

This document provides comprehensive performance analysis of WordZero compared to similar libraries in other programming languages. Our benchmarks demonstrate WordZero's superior performance in document generation tasks.

中文文档 | English Documentation

📊 Executive Summary

WordZero delivers exceptional performance in document generation, outperforming comparable libraries by significant margins:

• 3.7x faster than JavaScript implementations
• 21x faster than Python implementations
• Zero dependencies with minimal memory footprint
• Consistent performance across different document sizes

🎯 Benchmark Methodology

Test Environment

Hardware: Intel i7-11800H, 32GB RAM
OS: Windows 11 Pro
Go Version: 1.21.3
Node.js Version: 18.18.0
Python Version: 3.11.5

Test Scenarios

We tested three common document generation scenarios:

1. Basic Document Creation: Simple text with formatting
2. Table Generation: Complex tables with styling
3. Template Processing: Dynamic content with variables

Libraries Compared

Language	Library	Version
Go	WordZero	v0.4.0
JavaScript	docx	v8.5.0
Python	python-docx	v0.8.11

📈 Performance Results

Overall Performance Comparison

Language	Average Time	Relative Performance	Memory Usage
Golang (WordZero)	2.62ms	1.00x (baseline)	~5MB
JavaScript (docx)	9.63ms	3.67x slower	~12MB
Python (python-docx)	55.98ms	21.37x slower	~25MB

Detailed Benchmark Results

Test 1: Basic Document Creation

Operation: Create document with 10 formatted paragraphs
Iterations: 1000 runs

Language	Min Time	Max Time	Avg Time	Std Dev
Go	1.2ms	4.1ms	2.1ms	0.3ms
JavaScript	6.8ms	15.2ms	8.9ms	1.2ms
Python	42.1ms	78.5ms	51.2ms	4.8ms

Test 2: Table Generation

Operation: Create 5x10 table with formatting and data
Iterations: 500 runs

Language	Min Time	Max Time	Avg Time	Std Dev
Go	2.8ms	6.2ms	3.4ms	0.5ms
JavaScript	11.2ms	18.7ms	13.8ms	1.8ms
Python	58.9ms	95.1ms	68.7ms	7.2ms

Test 3: Template Processing

Operation: Process template with 20 variables and conditional blocks
Iterations: 200 runs

Language	Min Time	Max Time	Avg Time	Std Dev
Go	1.8ms	4.9ms	2.3ms	0.4ms
JavaScript	8.1ms	16.3ms	11.2ms	2.1ms
Python	45.2ms	82.7ms	59.8ms	6.5ms

🔍 Performance Analysis

Why WordZero is Faster

1. Native Compilation

• Go compiles to native machine code
• No runtime interpretation overhead
• Optimal CPU instruction utilization

2. Memory Management

• Efficient garbage collection
• Minimal heap allocations
• Stack-based temporary variables

3. Zero Dependencies

• No external library overhead
• Reduced binary size
• Faster startup times

4. Optimized XML Processing

• Custom XML generation
• Streaming where possible
• Minimal string concatenation

Language-Specific Factors

JavaScript (Node.js)

• V8 engine optimization
• Event loop overhead
• Dynamic typing costs
• Large dependency tree

Python

• Interpreted execution
• Global Interpreter Lock (GIL)
• Dynamic typing overhead
• Memory management inefficiencies

📊 Scalability Analysis

Document Size Impact

Testing with documents of varying sizes:

Document Size	Go (WordZero)	JavaScript	Python
Small (1-5 pages)	2.1ms	8.9ms	51.2ms
Medium (10-20 pages)	4.8ms	18.7ms	125.6ms
Large (50+ pages)	12.3ms	45.2ms	312.8ms

Memory Usage Scaling

Document Size	Go Memory	JS Memory	Python Memory
Small	3.2MB	8.5MB	18.2MB
Medium	6.8MB	16.9MB	42.7MB
Large	15.1MB	38.4MB	98.5MB

🎛️ Performance Optimization Tips

For WordZero Users

1. Batch Operations

// Efficient: Batch multiple operations
doc := document.New()
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
    para := doc.AddParagraph(fmt.Sprintf("Paragraph %d", i))
    para.SetFontSize(12)
}

// Less efficient: Save frequently
// doc.Save() in loop

2. Reuse Style Objects

// Efficient: Create style once, reuse
headingStyle := style.StyleHeading1
for _, title := range titles {
    para := doc.AddParagraph(title)
    para.SetStyle(headingStyle)
}

3. Pre-allocate Slices

// Efficient: Pre-allocate when size is known
rows := make([][]string, 0, expectedRows)

4. Use Streaming for Large Documents

// For very large documents, process in chunks
const chunkSize = 1000
for i := 0; i < totalItems; i += chunkSize {
    processChunk(items[i:min(i+chunkSize, totalItems)])
}

🔬 Benchmark Code

Go (WordZero) Implementation

func benchmarkDocumentCreation(b *testing.B) {
    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        doc := document.New()
        
        // Add title
        title := doc.AddParagraph("Performance Test Document")
        title.SetStyle(style.StyleHeading1)
        
        // Add content paragraphs
        for j := 0; j < 10; j++ {
            para := doc.AddParagraph(fmt.Sprintf("This is paragraph %d with formatting.", j+1))
            para.SetFontFamily("Arial")
            para.SetFontSize(12)
            if j%2 == 0 {
                para.SetBold(true)
            }
        }
        
        // Create table
        tableConfig := &document.TableConfig{Rows: 5, Columns: 3}
        table := doc.AddTable(tableConfig)
        
        for row := 0; row < 5; row++ {
            for col := 0; col < 3; col++ {
                table.SetCellText(row, col, fmt.Sprintf("Cell %d,%d", row, col))
            }
        }
        
        // Save document
        doc.Save(fmt.Sprintf("bench_%d.docx", i))
    }
}

JavaScript Implementation

function benchmarkDocumentCreation() {
    const doc = new docx.Document({
        sections: [{
            properties: {},
            children: [
                new docx.Paragraph({
                    children: [
                        new docx.TextRun({
                            text: "Performance Test Document",
                            bold: true,
                            size: 28,
                        }),
                    ],
                    heading: docx.HeadingLevel.HEADING_1,
                }),
                // Add content paragraphs...
                new docx.Table({
                    rows: [
                        // Table rows...
                    ],
                }),
            ],
        }],
    });
    
    return docx.Packer.toBuffer(doc);
}

Python Implementation

def benchmark_document_creation():
    doc = Document()
    
    # Add title
    title = doc.add_heading('Performance Test Document', 0)
    
    # Add content paragraphs
    for i in range(10):
        para = doc.add_paragraph(f'This is paragraph {i+1} with formatting.')
        if i % 2 == 0:
            para.runs[0].bold = True
        para.runs[0].font.name = 'Arial'
        para.runs[0].font.size = Pt(12)
    
    # Create table
    table = doc.add_table(rows=5, cols=3)
    for row_idx, row in enumerate(table.rows):
        for col_idx, cell in enumerate(row.cells):
            cell.text = f'Cell {row_idx},{col_idx}'
    
    # Save document
    doc.save(f'bench_{time.time()}.docx')

🎯 Real-World Performance

Production Use Cases

1. Report Generation Service

• Scenario: Generate 1000 reports/hour
• WordZero Performance: 2.6 seconds total
• Alternative Estimate: 16+ seconds (JavaScript), 93+ seconds (Python)

2. Batch Invoice Processing

• Scenario: Process 500 invoices
• WordZero Performance: 1.3 seconds
• Memory Usage: <50MB peak

3. Template-Based Document Service

• Scenario: 10,000 document requests/day
• WordZero Advantage: Handles with single instance
• Resource Savings: 60-80% less CPU and memory

📈 Performance Trends

Version History Performance

Version	Avg Time	Memory	Notes
v0.1.0	4.1ms	8.2MB	Initial release
v0.2.0	3.8ms	7.1MB	XML optimization
v0.3.0	3.2ms	6.5MB	Memory improvements
v0.4.0	2.6ms	5.8MB	Latest optimizations

Future Optimization Targets

• Target v0.5.0: <2.0ms average time
• Memory Goal: <5MB for typical documents
• Streaming: Large document support with constant memory

🔧 Profiling and Monitoring

Built-in Performance Monitoring

// Enable performance tracking
doc := document.New()
doc.EnablePerformanceTracking()

// Your document operations...

// Get performance metrics
metrics := doc.GetPerformanceMetrics()
fmt.Printf("Total time: %v\n", metrics.TotalTime)
fmt.Printf("Memory peak: %v\n", metrics.MemoryPeak)

Custom Benchmarking

func customBenchmark() {
    start := time.Now()
    
    // Your document operations
    doc := document.New()
    // ... operations ...
    
    elapsed := time.Since(start)
    fmt.Printf("Operation took: %v\n", elapsed)
}

📋 Conclusion

WordZero's performance advantages make it an excellent choice for:

• High-throughput document services
• Resource-constrained environments
• Real-time document generation
• Cost-sensitive applications

The combination of Go's performance characteristics and WordZero's optimized implementation delivers significant advantages in both speed and resource utilization.

---

For more performance tips and optimization strategies, see our Best Practices guide.